#3 Clemson vs #5 Georgia (ABC, 7:30PM EDT)

#26
#26
This is what a #3 vs #5 should look like.

The sad state of affairs is if this was Bama against either they would be up by at least 14.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAMA-DAWG
#31
#31
That’s what Clemson needed. They just have to win one on one battles. The first time they beat Bama to win the NC that’s how they did it. Their WRs simply abused the Bama DBs one on one.
 
#36
#36
UGA looks like the better team. Clemson's skill players are uninspiring. Once Georgia gets the lead I dont see them relenting it.
 
#43
#43
Thought dawgs would be running the ball. Not sure the Oline up to it. Lost 51 on first series. That was big.
 
#44
#44
vavolfan6 said:
UGA looks like the better team. Clemson's skill players are uninspiring. Once Georgia gets the lead I dont see them relenting it.
Click to expand...
Don’t forget though. Clemson has the edge on the sidelines. UGA does look like the better team though.
 
#49
#49
AthensVol2007 said:
It took Dabo 7 years to play for a title, in an infinitely weaker conference. It took Kirby 2. If Kirby had the team he’s had for the last 4 years and was in the ACC he’d be in the playoffs every year as well.
Click to expand...

Uhmmm, Dabo had to rebuild that program into the powerhouse it is today.

Kirby took over a 10 win team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stolitonic, igotworms, hUTch2002 and 1 other person
#50
#50
AthensVol2007 said:
It took Dabo 7 years to play for a title, in an infinitely weaker conference. It took Kirby 2. If Kirby had the team he’s had for the last 4 years and was in the ACC he’d be in the playoffs every year as well.
Click to expand...

And let’s face it. If Saban wasn’t at Bama, Smart would be ruling the SEC.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top