9/11 Conspiracy Thread

#551
#551
Pacer92 said:
Lol. If the weight is evenly distributed from top to bottom like the wtc or 10 snow blocks, it doesn't matter.

Unless the bottom 80% is compromised there is too much resistence for the top 20% to pancake the rest.
Click to expand...
Good grief. The bottom 80% WAS compromised by the top 20% falling on it.
 
#552
#552
Pacer92 said:
Lol. If the weight is evenly distributed from top to bottom like the wtc or 10 snow blocks, it doesn't matter.

Unless the bottom 80% is compromised there is too much resistence for the top 20% to pancake the rest.
Click to expand...

Good lord....

Are the floors of a building evenly distributed the same way as a stack of SOLID blocks?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#553
#553
PKT_VOL said:
Let's make this thread more interesting. For those of you who believe it was a conspiracy:

1) What happened to the towers (all three)?
2) What happened to the Pentagon?
3) What happened to the other plane (if there was one)?
4) Who was directly responsible (meaning doing the actual dirty work)?
5) Who was indirectly responsible (the masterminds)?
6) To what end or goal was 9/11 for?

Please don't link videos. I just want to your own words of what you feel happened.
Click to expand...

:bump3: for the new page.
 
#556
#556
bamawriter said:
As has been pointed out numerous times, the buildings did not collapse at freefall speed. This can be easily seen since the debris was falling faster than the buildings. The buildings met brief resistance as they fell, the debris did not.
Click to expand...

So instead of 10-11 seconds, they fell 3-4 seconds slower than free fall maybe? Is this your argument?
 
#562
#562
Septic said:
You understand that 15 stories crushes the 16th, then 16 crush 17, then 17 crush 18 etc. right?
Click to expand...

So, are those elastic collisions or inelastic collisions?

How to Determine Whether a Collision Is Elastic or Inelastic - For Dummies

If you are honest, you would have to say that floors collapsing on top of each other are inelastic collisions, which means that the kinetic energy of Floor 15 is transferred to Floor 14 and used to bend and buckle it and then jar it loose to where the 14th floor collapses and does the same to the 13th and so on. With each transfer of kinetic energy, you should see some delay, not floors falling in free fall...
 
#563
#563
Pacer, please answer the question posed by PKT.

I'd love to hear what you think happened without you parroting what talking heads have said. But I get the creeping suspicion you are unable to actually formulate your own opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#564
#564
Grand Vol said:
You must have your pages set a lot higher than most. That was a couple of pages back.

And don't you know we've moved on to igloo construction at this point?
Click to expand...

50 posts per page.

Didn't you know the inuit were master architects? How else did we develop skyscrapers? It all started with physics of ice man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#566
#566
Rasputin_Vol said:
So, are those elastic collisions or inelastic collisions?

How to Determine Whether a Collision Is Elastic or Inelastic - For Dummies

If you are honest, you would have to say that floors collapsing on top of each other are inelastic collisions, which means that the kinetic energy of Floor 15 is transferred to Floor 14 and used to bend and buckle it and then jar it loose to where the 14th floor collapses and does the same to the 13th and so on. With each transfer of kinetic energy, you should see some delay, not floors falling in free fall...
Click to expand...

This is from a link I posted that you and the others didn't bother reading:

Nearly every large building has a redundant design that allows for loss of one primary structural member, such as a column. However, when multiple members fail, the shifting loads eventually overstress the adjacent members and the collapse occurs like a row of dominoes falling down.

The perimeter tube design of the WTC was highly redundant. It survived the loss of several exterior columns due to aircraft impact, but the ensuing fire led to other steel failures. Many structural engineers believe that the weak points—the limiting factors on design allowables—were the angle clips that held the floor joists between the columns on the perimeter wall and the core structure (see Figure 5). With a 700 Pa floor design allowable, each floor should have been able to support approximately 1,300 t beyond its own weight. The total weight of each tower was about 500,000 t.

As the joists on one or two of the most heavily burned floors gave way and the outer box columns began to bow outward, the floors above them also fell. The floor below (with its 1,300 t design capacity) could not support the roughly 45,000 t of ten floors (or more) above crashing down on these angle clips. This started the domino effect that caused the buildings to collapse within ten seconds, hitting bottom with an estimated speed of 200 km per hour. If it had been free fall, with no restraint, the collapse would have only taken eight seconds and would have impacted at 300 km/h.1 It has been suggested that it was fortunate that the WTC did not tip over onto other buildings surrounding the area. There are several points that should be made. First, the building is not solid; it is 95 percent air and, hence, can implode onto itself. Second, there is no lateral load, even the impact of a speeding aircraft, which is sufficient to move the center of gravity one hundred feet to the side such that it is not within the base footprint of the structure. Third, given the near free-fall collapse, there was insufficient time for portions to attain significant lateral velocity. To summarize all of these points, a 500,000 t structure has too much inertia to fall in any direction other than nearly straight down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#568
#568
That many believe the WTC attacks are a conspiracy and that it has somehow been kept a secret blows my mind. The little Snowdens of the world would be blabbing and running off to Russia left and right.

The same government that couldn't pull off a hotel break in, a gun walking operation, a YouTube video protest embassy attack and etc. was somehow able to scam the whole world..... And keep it on the down low......mother of pearl
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#569
#569
thermite_paint.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#572
#572
If you post enough repetitive videos, they might magically change the past and become accurate.

Seriously, you've posted enough. Try answering the questions directed to you. If you aren't able to, maybe you should just stop all together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#574
#574
bamawriter said:
If you post enough repetitive videos, they might magically change the past and become accurate.

Seriously, you've posted enough. Try answering the questions directed to you. If you aren't able to, maybe you should just stop all together.
Click to expand...

It's what the troll does. He avoids the tough questions and side steps the facts. Which is why I haven't even attempted to counter any of his arguments.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top