9/11 Conspiracy Thread

#752
#752
David Icke has been saying the Moon is actually hollow and was put there by our Reptillian Overlords. Just makes to much damn sense.
 
#753
#753
dduncan4163 said:
Before you go would you answer this? You may have already answered this and if so direct me to the page, but if the government was responable for 9/11 what was their motives?
Click to expand...

In short, I feel it was to ensure that fighting global wars under the propaganda of "fighting terrorism" would be a constant....via the engrained image, that is 911...
 
#754
#754
Pacer92 said:
Do you have ANYTHING to counter besides this?

Lol
Click to expand...

You ask this AFTER posting the link? That guy's so called experiment was soooo over simplified and ignorant he'd been better off filming himself scraping dog sh** off of his shoe.

Surely you don't really believe that has one ounce of relevance.... do you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#755
#755
Pacer92 said:
The fact is that no one in here is going to change the others mind no matter what we post. You believe one way or the other and there's really no in between.

I can be a competitive smart ass I know, but I harbor no hard feelings because you oppose me with smart assedness. Life's too short...

Good luck with this thread. I'm out....for now..

:hi:
Click to expand...

You haven't even bothered to look at anything anyone has posted.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#758
#758
Pacer92 said:
Wings that a human being can't stand on without endangering them, don't slice through steel and concrete...
Click to expand...

I really need to know where in your mind you created this? Did you just believe something stupid you read online? For years, I have stood on the wings of Boeing aircraft on a regular basis. In fact, some work that needs to be done by the maintenance guys requires it.

So which is it?
 
#759
#759
Pacer92 said:
If I'm wrong, where is the evidence showing a plane crash with people and luggage. Where is the debris field?

Whatever hit in PA or the Pentagon obviously had no people in them. Until someone can present photos of massive amounts of death I'll continue to believe this.

I think the crash in PA was made to be a feel good story for Americans to rally around. Those brave people fought back and prevented the terrorist from succeeding, even in the face of certain death. It was a rally cry imo.
Click to expand...

You do realize the planes were traveling over 400 mph right? Flight 93.... If not shot down..... Went straight down into the ground at such s high speed it was practically vaporized..... Same as the plane at the pentagon and the two at the WTC. Vaporized I say......
 
#760
#760
Carl Pickens said:
You ask this AFTER posting the link? That guy's so called experiment was soooo over simplified and ignorant he'd been better off filming himself scraping dog sh** off of his shoe.

Surely you don't really believe that has one ounce of relevance.... do you?
Click to expand...

I'm thinking more along the lines of 12 ounces at the moment. :salute:
 
#761
#761
Carl Pickens said:
You do realize the planes were traveling over 400 mph right? Flight 93.... If not shot down..... Went straight down into the ground at such s high speed it was practically vaporized..... Same as the plane at the pentagon and the two at the WTC. Vaporized I say......
Click to expand...

Just "POOF" huh? :lolabove:

Gotta go on that one...
 
#763
#763
Carl Pickens said:
You do realize the planes were traveling over 400 mph right? Flight 93.... If not shot down..... Went straight down into the ground at such s high speed it was practically vaporized..... Same as the plane at the pentagon and the two at the WTC. Vaporized I say......
Click to expand...

Are you still willing to buy the idea that the plane was incinerated in the explosion? Can the energy exist to blow a plane into small bits of metal while simultaneously penetrating 310 feet into the Pentagon? The problem there is that photos of the damaged Pentagon clearly show offices with their side wall sheared off. Visible are wooden desks with computers on them and other office furniture. There’s even a wooden stool with an open book sitting on top of it just a foot or two from the ripped off wall. The heat was intense enough to vaporize the plane but not hot enough to set office furniture or books on fire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#764
#764
The Ron Mexico said:
I really need to know where in your mind you created this? Did you just believe something stupid you read online? For years, I have stood on the wings of Boeing aircraft on a regular basis. In fact, some work that needs to be done by the maintenance guys requires it.

So which is it?
Click to expand...

Look sheep. Your first hand knowledge is nothing compared to the power and experience of the youtube world. They know all and your pitiful attempts to lead us astray are way to obvious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#766
#766
AirVol said:
Are you still willing to buy the idea that the plane was incinerated in the explosion? Can the energy exist to blow a plane into small bits of metal while simultaneously penetrating 310 feet into the Pentagon? The problem there is that photos of the damaged Pentagon clearly show offices with their side wall sheared off. Visible are wooden desks with computers on them and other office furniture. There’s even a wooden stool with an open book sitting on top of it just a foot or two from the ripped off wall. The heat was intense enough to vaporize the plane but not hot enough to set office furniture or books on fire.
Click to expand...

Not the heat..... Just the sheer speed of the plane impacting the building.
 
#767
#767
Carl Pickens said:
Not the heat..... Just the sheer speed of the plane impacting the building.
Click to expand...

the space shuttle Columbia fell apart at 13,000 mph and part of it were found in several states. Sheer speed didn't disintegrate those parts. It was traveling 26 times faster than the 757-200 that hit the pentagon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#768
#768
AirVol said:
the space shuttle Columbia fell apart at 13,000 mph and part of it were found in several states. Sheer speed didn't disintegrate those parts. It was traveling 26 times faster than the 757-200 that hit the pentagon.
Click to expand...

Did you see this? It's an older video that has nothing to do with 9/11 so there's no hidden agenda

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RZjhxuhTmGk
 
#769
#769
AirVol said:
the space shuttle Columbia fell apart at 13,000 mph and part of it were found in several states. Sheer speed didn't disintegrate those parts. It was traveling 26 times faster than the 757-200 that hit the pentagon.
Click to expand...

Wait, Columbia hit a building? If not, what is your point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#770
#770
I've thoroughly enjoyed this thread. I would like to make a point to everyone that thinks they've debunked the $2.6T comment Rumsfeld made and then enjoyed making fun of others' critical thinking skills. $2.6T absolutely cannot be explained away by an accounting error because it's simply too massive an amount.

Let me put it in perspective using my rough math. $2.6T is about 15% of US GDP; it's well over half the annual federal budget; and it's roughly 5 times the annual DOD budget. Of course Rumsfeld didn't specify a timeline, so maybe the DOD couldn't reconcile anything in their entire budget for five years. Even if your generous and extend the timeframe over 10 years; if you accept having no idea where half the money in the DOD's budget is, can just be an accounting error... please, please, please let me be your accountant. Because you're way more gullible than you think the people you're making fun of are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#771
#771
red butler said:
I've thoroughly enjoyed this thread. I would like to make a point to everyone that thinks they've debunked the $2.6T comment Rumsfeld made and then enjoyed making fun of others' critical thinking skills. $2.6T absolutely cannot be explained away by an accounting error because it's simply too massive an amount.

Let me put it in perspective using my rough math. $2.6T is about 15% of US GDP; it's well over half the annual federal budget; and it's roughly 5 times the annual DOD budget. Of course Rumsfeld didn't specify a timeline, so maybe the DOD couldn't reconcile anything in their entire budget for five years. Even if your generous and extend the timeframe over 10 years; if you accept having no idea where half the money in the DOD's budget is, can just be an accounting error... please, please, please let me be your accountant. Because you're way more gullible than you think the people you're making fun of are.
Click to expand...

It was a systemic problem. No money was actually missing. This is a pointless red herring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#772
#772
bamawriter said:
It was a systemic problem. No money was actually missing. This is a pointless red herring.
Click to expand...

Can I handle your finances? Because I'm sure that Rumsfeld was complaining about money that wasn't really missing too.
 
Last edited:
#775
#775
bamawriter said:
Not saying it's not a problem. The issue is how it has any connection to the events of 9/11, other than the coincidental timing of Rumsfeld's remarks.
Click to expand...

Have you paid attention at all to what was stored in wing one of the pentagon, where the plane hit? I've tried to be logical and sound and nobody seems able to hold a serious conversation on your side. Youe best comebacks are point your finger and laugh, did you see that guys, rhetoric
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top