- Joined
- Oct 24, 2003
- Messages
- 115,330
- Likes
- 67,841
Am I not answering the way you want? Is that it?
I'm arguing the evidence and science that is known...
You aren't answering anyone's specific questions regarding your theories. Why is that?
Please refer to my above questions. Thanks
What I never understand is why most conspiracy guys don't just buy into 1 or 2 or etc theories. They seem to buy everything.
He can't answer because he hasn't thought it all thru. He subscribes to every conspiracy theory with peak commitment and doesn't concern himself with contradictions. If you need a perfect example of cognitive dissonance, you need look no further than this thread.
I simply asked for your opinion on these questions:
Why wouldn't they just use the planes that had been hijacked? What's the point of hijacking planes if you're just going to use a cruise missile? Just crash the actual planes into buildings. (This was BW's question to you yesterday, I believe)
Also, DC/Baltimore has a metropolitan population of nearly 10 million. Launching a cruise missile over the city doesn't seem like a very good way to cover up what is really going on, does it?
If you don't think you can answer them logically, that's ok to admit. I'm trying to understand your line of thinking on what is the most logical conclusion, in your opinion.
Obviously, and I've made this clear, if they used a cruise missile on the Pentagon and no plane in Shanksville, there was no hijacking of these two planes...
Is that simple enough for you guys?
He can't answer because he hasn't thought it all thru. He subscribes to every conspiracy theory with peak commitment and doesn't concern himself with contradictions. If you need a perfect example of cognitive dissonance, you need look no further than this thread.
Sure. I do have a couple follow up questions though.
Where are these physical planes? Did they crash them in the ocean? Are they parked on a remote island somewhere? Did they make up these flights? Are all the people who were on those planes made up? If they weren't made up people, where are they now?
Yep, Grandvol called it, more of the exact same arguments that were beat down before. Free falling this, pilots couldn't do it that...it's #$&%@ 50 First Dates with this stuff.
Nothing new and the only questions that can't be answered are the ones being leveled at the Truthers. First and foremost why in the blue screaming monkey humping hell would anyone use such a Rube Goldberg/Wile E Coyote on acid plan in the first place? It's idiocy dipped in stupid wrapped absurdity drizzled with incredulity.
OK, let's accept there were people with nefarious intent in the government/secret cabal/Illuminati/whoever. Let's accept they were willing (or found puppets who were) to die for the cause. Let's accept they were willing to kill many innocents to reach their goal. In short, as far as who and why are concerned, let's just go ahead and accept ALL OF IT.
Accepting all of the above only people on not just "full" but "mega-ultra-super-epic-full retard" would undertake the Truthers operation. The degree of complicity alone (ALONE!) would get the plan laughed at by our evil schemers. The simple truth of the matter is there's no reason to believe, for one nanosecond, that a group of bright 5th graders could cook up a better plan, which could accomplish the same general social/political ends, with 99% less logistical and security exposure, than this Hatter's Tea Party that gets passed off as the modern 9/11 conspiracy model.
If what you want is the effect of flying some planes into buildings why not do JUST that? Even more conniving would be if you got wind of such a plot bury/deflect the Intel and hope they succeed if that helps your goal. Nice conspiracy to play with there. The whole Timothy Leary chasing dragons bit stops making sense before it GATS out of the planning stage much less application.
Can you contradict the explosions in the video I linked? Can you link anything that is substantial or useful to the debate?
Can you hide your emotional, whiny lurking?
Ok, I'm at least starting to see your line of thinking.
The passengers that the government tells us perished on those planes, they were made up people too?
I have given up debating facts with you after your meltdown over the "they had only a few hours of training" nonsense that was disproven by a link from your very own source. The facts were linked by YOUR SOURCE and you just pretended like they weren't there in black and white.
So if you don't care about facts, I see no reason to provide them. I'm more interested in how you flesh out your overall theory.
That's what i was referring to, the people...
I don't think it necessary to destroy or hide those two planes when a new number or paint job would suffice, jmo..
Just admit you can't contradict them. You're laughable..
Done with you..
This is why it's the same thing...^^^
People who can't logically question. They resort to emotional attacking. Can't fathom our government doing wrong here, but attack it every day in other threads...
The families who say they lost loved ones from the planes, air traffic controllers, United/American Airlines officials, Laguardia/airport officials, investigators at the crash sites, witnesses who say they saw planes/crashes.. All actors/part of the cover up?