jmacvols1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,522
- Likes
- 22,714
It does. Good grief man you can't be serious.
It does not limit but it reduces!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Read it over and over, one word at a time, and then two words at a time.
Maybe you can understand with a simpler, non-gun related, scenario.
McDonalds increases the price of a Big Mac to $17.
They do not limit the number a person can purchase, but the number people purchase will be reduced.
Get it?
Reduction without limitation.
But I also have some reasonable proposals that would set limits. (but that's a different debate)
It's the old, "how do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time."This is in their Give a Mouse a Cookie handbook:
We're going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest. Right now, though, we'd be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in the United States — is going to take time. My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.
It's more from the compromise and negotiation handbook.This is in their Give a Mouse a Cookie handbook:
We're going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest. Right now, though, we'd be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in the United States — is going to take time. My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.
It does. Good grief man you can't be serious.
It does not limit but it reduces!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Read it over and over, one word at a time, and then two words at a time.
Maybe you can understand with a simpler, non-gun related, scenario.
McDonalds increases the price of a Big Mac to $17.
They do not limit the number a person can purchase, but the number people purchase will be reduced.
Get it?
Reduction without limitation.
But I also have some reasonable proposals that would set limits. (but that's a different debate)
Lol. You're idea of compromise is a little different than most. I ask for this, you ask for this, I get nothing, you get everything, or maybe a little less than you asked for. It's hilarious how the communist mind works.
I got a former co-worker that spews much of the same nonsense. His views on healthcare are incredible. Govt ran of course. Doctors should make around the average annual income of most Americans. 50-60k. To keep them honest. Also, he thinks all his appointments should be scheduled by the Govt. And they should call him to remind him the day before.He's a dyed in the wool communist. Ask him about property rights.
The motivation for purchasing with intent to resell would be reduced.
They're commies and don't even recognize it. I had an old missionary tell me when I was in my teens that communism would take over the United States without ever firing a shot. I laughed and said no way, Americans would never give up our freedoms. It absolutely is happening right before our eyes.I got a former co-worker that spews much of the same nonsense. His views on healthcare are incredible. Govt ran of course. Doctors should make around the average annual income of most Americans. 50-60k. To keep them honest. Also, he thinks all his appointments should be scheduled by the Govt. And they should call him to remind him the day before.
He wants a mommy is what he’s saying.
Of course they do. Who said they didn't? Certainly NEVER me.Lol wut? Criminals don't have full auto weapons? Chicago says hi
I think most everyone has the same definition....Lol. You're idea of compromise is a little different than most. I ask for this, you ask for this, I get nothing, you get everything, or maybe a little less than you asked for. It's hilarious how the communist mind works.
I'm all for making those attempts.....in conjunction with.I know it was so shallow and tired it had the unintended affect on alcohol and now drugs. What's tired is the call for bans that make non of us safer, let's make attempts to actual curb violence instead of selling warm and fuzzies that don't materialize.
So you are going to decide what rights we get and what we don't. You're right, I don't understand how anyone that has enjoyed the liberties that they have had growing up in this country to make a statement like the one above. I wouldn't trust you as a crossing guard, much less to "make my rights worth having". You are one ****ed up individual.That's where you're wrong. It's people like me that will ensure your rights are actually worth having. I no longer expect you to understand that.
What concessions are you willing yo make? Repealing the NFA?I think most everyone has the same definition....
noun
verb
- an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions.
2. accept standards that are lower than is desirable.
- 1. settle a dispute by mutual concession.