Air fresheners are illegal in Minnesota

#803
#803
n_huffhines said:
View attachment 362245
Click to expand...
doctor PRACTICES carry insurance not necessarily doctors themselves, and 95% of police shootings are NOT against the law or a mistake

Doctors do have immunity if they are following established law and guidelines

Officers are required to be license and certified and can lose those certifications if found to be guilty of negligence or a crime

Doctors kill people via criminal or negligence by a 200 to 1 rate of police officers...and even if fired or sued move on to other hospitals without any other penalty
 
#804
#804
Rickyvol77 said:
doctor PRACTICES carry insurance not necessarily doctors themselves, and 95% of police shootings are NOT against the law or a mistake

Doctors do have immunity if they are following established law and guidelines

Officers are required to be license and certified and can lose those certifications if found to be guilty of negligence or a crime

Doctors kill people via criminal or negligence by a 200 to 1 rate of police officers...and even if fired or sued move on to other hospitals without any other penalty
Click to expand...

What? No they don't. You can sue a doctor anytime for no reason at all. ****, you could sue a doctor who didn't treat you.
 
#805
#805
n_huffhines said:
What? No they don't. You can sue a doctor anytime for no reason at all. ****, you could sue a doctor who didn't treat you.
Click to expand...
Why do you think that it should be ok to sue a police officer or a doctor for any time for no reason at all? You can sue a police officer also it will just get dismissed 99% of the time because it's recognized as BS
 
#806
#806
Rickyvol77 said:
Why do you think that it should be ok to sue a police officer or a doctor for any time for no reason at all? You can sue a police officer also it will just get dismissed 99% of the time because it's recognized as BS
Click to expand...

Nobody said it's OK. I said it's the reality. You cannot sue a police officer over just anything. In many cases, they are wrongly protected from very bad behavior with qualified immunity. Kelly Thomas' parents could only sue the city because those killers were protected.
 
Last edited:
#808
#808
n_huffhines said:
Nobody said it's OK. I said it's the reality. You cannot sue a police officer over anything. They are wrongly protected from very bad behavior with qualified immunity. Kelly Thomas' parents could only sue the city because those killers were protected.
Click to expand...
They couldnt have sued the officers because they were found by jury to be not guilty of all criminal charges thus eliminating any chance of showing that the officers" violated clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known".

I agree those officers deserved harsher punishment, but they were found not guilty in court which complicates the legal aspect of it.
 
#809
#809
Rickyvol77 said:
They couldnt have sued the officers because they were found by jury to be not guilty of all criminal charges thus eliminating any chance of showing that the officers" violated clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known".

I agree those officers deserved harsher punishment, but they were found not guilty in court which complicates the legal aspect of it.
Click to expand...

This just a long way of saying those killer cops were protected by the law, which is exactly the point of OP.
 
#810
#810
n_huffhines said:
This just a long way of saying those killer cops were protected by the law, which is exactly the point of OP.
Click to expand...
that's not true though when they were found not guilty...they had their day in court...may not agree with the verdict but it is what it is
 
#811
#811
Rickyvol77 said:
that's not true though when they were found not guilty...they had their day in court...may not agree with the verdict but it is what it is
Click to expand...

OJ had his day in court. Not guilty. Still had to face civil suits. If a doctor facing criminal charges is found not guilty, is he now protected from civil suit? Of course not.

It's very simple. They are getting special protection from civil suits because they are cops. You're just explaining the process. You're not refuting the fact that they have special protection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyler Durden and volfanhill
#812
#812
Rickyvol77 said:
doctor PRACTICES carry insurance not necessarily doctors themselves, and 95% of police shootings are NOT against the law or a mistake

Doctors do have immunity if they are following established law and guidelines

Officers are required to be license and certified and can lose those certifications if found to be guilty of negligence or a crime

Doctors kill people via criminal or negligence by a 200 to 1 rate of police officers...and even if fired or sued move on to other hospitals without any other penalty
Click to expand...
This isn't exactly factual.
 
#814
#814
n_huffhines said:
What? No they don't. You can sue a doctor anytime for no reason at all. ****, you could sue a doctor who didn't treat you.
Click to expand...
Actually malpractice claims are near impossible to win. There's so much procedural red tape that it takes a REALLY big fk up for a lawyer to take it. This is from experience that I'd rather not get into.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#815
#815
n_huffhines said:
OJ had his day in court. Not guilty. Still had to face civil suits. If a doctor facing criminal charges is found not guilty, is he now protected from civil suit? Of course not.

It's very simple. They are getting special protection from civil suits because they are cops. You're just explaining the process. You're not refuting the fact that they have special protection.
Click to expand...


Yea double jeopardy is bs.
 
#816
#816
utvols88 said:
Actually malpractice claims are near impossible to win. There's so much procedural red tape that it takes a REALLY big fk up for a lawyer to take it. This is from experience that I'd rather not get into.
Click to expand...

The only time you truly "win" is if the suit is thrown out early (like if you enjoy qualified immunity). Anything else is still an L, and that's why people who are innocent settle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RikidyBones
#817
#817
n_huffhines said:
OJ had his day in court. Not guilty. Still had to face civil suits. If a doctor facing criminal charges is found not guilty, is he now protected from civil suit? Of course not.

It's very simple. They are getting special protection from civil suits because they are cops. You're just explaining the process. You're not refuting the fact that they have special protection.
Click to expand...

Slightly off-topic, but doctors in TN get protections from civil suits most other professions don't get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#820
#820
GSD82 said:
C’mon man, who here hasn’t chocked and robbed a woman?
Click to expand...
My favorite part of watching the woke crowd roll around is watching how they're literally constantly running their biggest proponents- women, especially the bored white kind- further and further down the victim hierarchy. Mystifying that any woman hops on board with movements that want them exterminated from sports competitions, physical existence, etc. etc. etc... Best examples are the woke weirdos claiming hijabs are liberating, praising a culture that only just allowed them to drive, and encouraging acceptance of a culture with something like a 500% higher incidence of domestic abuse against women.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, Rickyvol77 and GSD82
#824
#824
Rasputin_Vol said:
Anyone with common damn sense can see the cops have crossed the line and become far too aggressive and overzealous in enforcing the pettiest of laws.
Click to expand...
I don't think there are many that disagree with that.

The problem is the nitwits on the American left have turned a non-racial issue into a racial issue and galvanized everyone, still leaving, of course, the perpetrators (government) untouched and still in power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#825
#825
ButchPlz said:
I don't think there are many that disagree with that.

The problem is the nitwits on the American left have turned a non-racial issue into a racial issue and galvanized everyone, still leaving, of course, the perpetrators (government) untouched and still in power.
Click to expand...
Well let me say this, also. Those protests and riots have very little to do with wanting to solve the problem of overzealous police. There is obviously another motive behind those people's actions. Useful idiots being used for a seditious and destabilizing function, imo. George Floyd's death was just a convenient catalyst.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT, distrovol, Carl Pickens and 3 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top