Al Golden to Miami

#103
#103
SGMVols said:
Both.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

I will still contend with our hire last year that it wasn't an attractive job for big name coaches. I don't think most established coaches wanted to go through a rebuilding project (no matter the historical strength of the program) and I have always given Dooley credit for having the balls to take the challenge on (though you can argue it was a no lose). Also, take into acount NSD was barreling down quick.

Florida, however, does not have that excuse. I know Muschamp is a sexy pick, but I like it for us.
 
#104
#104
I'll drink to that, let's hope he and Jimbo poach the gatas!
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#106
#106
UTMVol76 said:
I will still contend with our hire last year that it wasn't an attractive job for big name coaches. I don't think most established coaches wanted to go through a rebuilding project (no matter the historical strength of the program) and I have always given Dooley credit for having the balls to take the challenge on (though you can argue it was a no lose). Also, take into acount NSD was barreling down quick.

Florida, however, does not have that excuse. I know Muschamp is a sexy pick, but I like it for us.
Click to expand...

Hell....he took on Louisiana Tech for gods sake. That had to take more balls than to accept the UT job.
I couldn't wrap my head around the hiring of Dooley at the time. I wanted Edsal. But now i wouldn't trade double D for anything. He's a great fit for UT.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top