butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 106,191
- Likes
- 221,552
Not sure why anyone would want to play QB for Nick Saban. He picked Daunte Culpepper over Drew Brees. Dude is as trash as the ACC with QBs.
Not sure why anyone would want to play QB for Nick Saban. He picked Daunte Culpepper over Drew Brees. Dude is as trash as the ACC with QBs.
Agree but to be fair at that time they were still working off of the philosophy of not needing a special qb just a game manager for their offense . I guess you dont need a live qb when you just hand the ball off or dink and dunk for 10-15 yards
Agreed. And someone had a head start on them once upon a time. Takes one or two epic classes and legit teaching and coaching and youre there...we always have all the other factors.
Why is Taulia thinking of going some place besides Alabama now ? I agree it doesnt hamper them or Clemson or Georgia . I would realisticly say that we arent where they are yet .
There's probably a relationship in place with Pruitt and he likely sees success for UT just a bit down the road. It would stand to reason he would be intrigued with UT because of the Pruitt factor and limited competition at the present time. He probably feels confident of seeing significant playing time at UT before he would at Bama.
To respond to your second comment, it seems to me that once a team reaches the level where Bama and Clemson are today, it would be a challenge to pull the superior QB talent they do year after year. But, history shows I'm wrong as these top 5* QB are not bashful to show up in Tuscaloosa and Clemson to compete. I've always felt these 5* would gravitate to a program where they are more assured of being the man. I'm obviously wrong, though.
I wouldn't paint it with a broad brush either way.There's probably a relationship in place with Pruitt and he likely sees success for UT just a bit down the road. It would stand to reason he would be intrigued with UT because of the Pruitt factor and limited competition at the present time. He probably feels confident of seeing significant playing time at UT before he would at Bama.
To respond to your second comment, it seems to me that once a team reaches the level where Bama and Clemson are today, it would be a challenge to pull the superior QB talent they do year after year. But, history shows I'm wrong as these top 5* QB are not bashful to show up in Tuscaloosa and Clemson to compete. I've always felt these 5* would gravitate to a program where they are more assured of being the man. I'm obviously wrong, though.
I wouldn't paint it with a broad brush either way.
Some top players only want to play for top programs that have lots of other top players. They don't fear stiff competition for playing time. They realize that will push them to get better. They may not play a lot quite as early, but feel that trade off will ultimately pay dividends.
On the other hand some top players will opt for an easier path to early playing time, even if they have to choose a program that's not as loaded with talent at other positions and less likely to be a playoff team.
Of course there are other factors that are also important in their decisions.
[/B]
Two of three. Fromm was a 4*, but who's counting?
Wow
Worried about getting good recruits because they may keep us from getting good recruits.
Too many 100s in my wallet... cant get more 100s in.
My bad, but what is interestung, while Fields is still an unknown as far as whether he will live up to the 5⭐ ranking, between Fromm and Eason it was Fromm who showed he came in to UGA college-ready and deserving of a 5th ⭐, while Eason didn't live up to the lofty ranking. Eason may very well turn out to be a great college QB before his career is over, but he was not ready from a maturity standpoint as a true freshman. Fronm on the other hand, as a true freshman, seemed as poised and polished as an upperclassman.
I dont think Eason wins the Notre Dame game. It required an unflappable steely mindset and that victory set the pace for their season. JMO.UGA was much better though as a whole when Fromm took over versus when Eason stepped in. The oline was better, Chubb was closer to preinjury form, the receivers were better, and the defense was much better. Because of those reasons Fromm had less responsibility than Eason had. Eason had to win games instead of being a game manager. I agree with you about Fromm being a better decision maker, but that could just be because of what I listed.
I thought that move was forced on him. Looking back, if brees went to Miami with Saban, we probably aren't having to deal with him at bama right now cause he'd still be in Miami.
No. It was up to him. He had a choice of Culpepper with series knee injury or Brees with a shoulder injury but not as serious as Culpeppers knee.
I'm bitter because I was wanting Brees and by chance ended up being right in hindsight. Saban is a better version of Schiano. Dude is an ass.