SweetasSoda
Captain of the Cheerleaders
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2018
- Messages
- 22,989
- Likes
- 141,167
Great postHave they? Do you think they checked with 247 and then decided to pursue highly talented kids? Or is it not a little more likely that the recruiting websites take notice of who teams with proven recruiting success are after?
If you have two kids playing the same position from GA that by all objective measures look pretty even and one is offered by Bama and UGA and the other is not... which one do you think gets the extra star?
The rankings to a large extent are self-fulfilling prophecies. Saban is great at identifying talent so talent he identifies rightly or wrongly... gets a bump.
There are at LEAST as many missed kids with 4/5* talent in any given class as there are kids who are given 4/5*.
Bama has been dominant not because they've had highly ranked class but they've been dominant AND had highly ranked classes in part because they know how to find talent. That may not seem to be an important distinction but it is. Agreeing with Saban does NOT validate a recruiting site's ability to recognize top talent.
The truth is that every year there are WAY more than enough underrated 3* players to build a championship caliber roster if a coach has the ability to recognize that talent. Few have done it. Dabo did. But that's the shortest path to being successful again. MANY coaches have tried, and failed, to go head to head with Bama for the players Bama wants because they're convinced those players are uniquely talented and elite.
For someone who made this post within the last 24 hours...Looking good on a message board went out the window for me many years ago lmao...
God forbid you say something negative about a coach here in their first 2 years. Doomer vs Sunshine pumper on here....who's been more correct the last 10 years? Who received more likes? We even run off our insiders here who make way better contributions to this board than I possibly could, so I don't worry.
Edit: I'm not evading my statement either. Truth hurts. 3 stars aren't good. If you need me to say "3 stars aren't good, typically", then so be it.
...you've spent an inordinate amount of time since to convince people of why stars matter. So the question is...Ignore the stars, I just want good football players here. Idk what's so hard about that.
I hope you took more from that statement than that.... It is a matter of personal integrity to admit when you are obviously wrong or misspoke.Looking good on a message board went out the window for me many years ago lmao...
Well... in a way. I'm not praising Heupel's recruiting to date. I have specifically tempered my praise of his leadership and coaching with the need to build a competitive roster.God forbid you say something negative about a coach here in their first 2 years. Doomer vs Sunshine pumper on here....who's been more correct the last 10 years? Who received more likes? We even run off our insiders here who make way better contributions to this board than I possibly could, so I don't worry.
You really don't get it, do you? This has nothing to do with criticizing a coach or even the recruiting effort. It has to do with making statements that are verifiably FALSE. Each 3 star player is an individual. You cannot reasonably, objectively say that "3 stars aren't good" because there are around 1800 INDIVIDUALS rated 3* in any particular year.Edit: I'm not evading my statement either. Truth hurts. 3 stars aren't good. If you need me to say "3 stars aren't good, typically", then so be it.
You can't be this dumb. This is an act.I think for something as obvious as "3 star recruits who are good or excellent football players exist" it's on everyone else. How many times can that argument be beaten to death in response to not being elated over taking 3 star recruits? If I had a nickel for every time Cam Sutton was dropped on a thread...
It is easier for them to rate some positions better than others. If a kid has HS success, a 4.2 shuttle, and great wingspan then you can safely rate them a high CB prospect. OL is very difficult and gets even more difficult if those kids don't attend camps.... like a couple of UT's commits apparently.Stars matter at certain positions. For example I’d be more concerned about landing a 5 star corner over a 3 star corner vs a 5 star Saftey over 3 star safety. Safety like OL and TE are positions that you can easily find guys that are underrated/under the radar that go on to develop into big time players. Those positions a lot of times come down to mental, drive, instinct and developmental skills not always seen to the public scouting eye in a camp setting.
Also so hard to judge kids in last class through the next few due to Covid. Going to be so many missed evals around country for awhile
For someone who made this post within the last 24 hours...
...you've spent an inordinate amount of time since to convince people of why stars matter. So the question is...
View attachment 416872
So like I said, last night...They don't matter, as long as you have 4 or 5.
You'd still take Khalil McKenzie over Aaron Donald or Vita Vea, JJ Peterson over Patrick Willis or Luke Kuechly, and Tate Martell over Patrick Mahomes or Russell Wilson, I suppose.
Solid approach you have; the "stars don't matter as long there's 4 or 5 of them" approach.
Just saw this idiot's lunacy. 3 stars aren't good? Dude I've coached multiple "3 stars" and coached against many more in highly competitive Georgia regions and seen many of them single-handedly take over a game. Some of these guys are rated artificially low because they can't or don't go to the right camps. The ones to look at are the ones who are "late risers". Either they grew and developed later than others or they just got found. This guy must have never played and/or coached (not counting rec ball). Stupid.I hope you took more from that statement than that.... It is a matter of personal integrity to admit when you are obviously wrong or misspoke.
Well... in a way. I'm not praising Heupel's recruiting to date. I have specifically tempered my praise of his leadership and coaching with the need to build a competitive roster.
You really don't get it, do you? This has nothing to do with criticizing a coach or even the recruiting effort. It has to do with making statements that are verifiably FALSE. Each 3 star player is an individual. You cannot reasonably, objectively say that "3 stars aren't good" because there are around 1800 INDIVIDUALS rated 3* in any particular year.
Here is a review of a couple of drafts by 247. Two things to note. Using the NFL draft as a quality measure, they're about 60% accurate on their 5*. Good. Not great. That means 40% of those guys that "elate" you... aren't worthy of the rating. It gets worse for 4*. So they aren't highly accurate even with the players they find, evaluate, and rate high.
Secondly and much more important to our conversation and your assumption that UT must be getting guys who are "not good football players"... is that more, a lot more, guys get drafted who were rated under 4* than above. It is completely accurate to say that for every 2 4/5* players they accurately rate... they miss 3. One of those misses... they don't even rate at all.
Their accuracy isn't good enough to support what you're trying to claim.
You are talking about the guy I responded to, right?Just saw this idiot's lunacy. 3 stars aren't good? Dude I've coached multiple "3 stars" and coached against many more in highly competitive Georgia regions and seen many of them single-handedly take over a game. Some of these guys are rated artificially low because they can't or don't go to the right camps. The ones to look at are the ones who are "late risers". Either they grew and developed later than others or they just got found. This guy must have never played and/or coached (not counting rec ball). Stupid.
I'm here. I'd like to flip this to everyone else. Prove to me that 3 stars are good football players besides just cherry picking your favorite 3 star athletes in the NFL. I'll wait.
Of course you'd like to flip it because you're over your head. You made a claim that's untenable. Too bad the burden's on you.I'm here. I'd like to flip this to everyone else. Prove to me that 3 stars are good football players besides just cherry picking your favorite 3 star athletes in the NFL. I'll wait.
Well you did come back to follow up one dumb comment with another dumb comment. So these so called recruiting experts knows more than coaches ? So all 4* & 5* always make it to the NFL and are never busts? If you are this upset and your mind is made up then why are you still here?I'm here. I'd like to flip this to everyone else. Prove to me that 3 stars are good football players besides just cherry picking your favorite 3 star athletes in the NFL. I'll wait.
Ugh, our four and five stars bolted. And it did work with 3 stars.Burden is a bit excessive wouldn’t you say? I think the burden is on you all doing the mental gymnastics to believe these 3 stars are gonna work.