Alex Jones found liable over Sandy Hook hoax conspiracy

… after waiting until May 2021 to even review.

Literally nobody will touch the work products of the esteemed Bobby Mueller. Not Congress in the impeachment articles. Not the FEC in this clearly major issue. The only feather in his hat is a white collar prosecution completely unrelated to his charter and happened a decade before the so called events he was charged to investigate. Oh and a couple of process crime equivalent of parking tickets.

But sure, you’ve informed us of another obviously major sin by Trump 🤡

Again, I appreciate your strangely dedicated efforts to make my point that campaign finance violations were not a priority or significant to the predicate for the investigation.
 
I'm aware of your blanket observation*...did you actually read even the first paragraph of that link? It's much more involved than what you appear to assert here.

*The changing sex/frog DNA thing was actually a player in the Jurassic Park story arc.
No
 
Again, I appreciate your strangely dedicated efforts to make my point that campaign finance violations were not a priority or significant to the predicate for the investigation.
I’m glad we agree you are making a case on investigation products that literally nobody will touch. The whole body of work products illustrates just how much of a waste of time it was… and does nothing to reinforce that the investigation was predicated which is your whole stupid sales job that nobody is buying… except for you… as usual.
 
Again, I appreciate your strangely dedicated efforts to make my point that campaign finance violations were not a priority or significant to the predicate for the investigation.
Then why did you bring it up the other day when I asked what was illegal about the meeting?

Campaigns can’t solicit or accept a promise of contributions from a foreign national.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
Because he alluded to the quiet unspoken part. The investigation was a non predicated fishing expedition as anybody with any common sense knows. And was used to distract away from Killary, the DNC, and Perkins Coie
Well that is what I have been saying all along...a conspiracy which is why I mentioned it in the first place. Jimminy
 
I’m glad we agree you are making a case on investigation products that literally nobody will touch. The whole body of work products illustrates just how much of a waste of time it was… and does nothing to reinforce that the investigation was predicated which is your whole stupid sales job that nobody is buying… except for you… as usual.
The Mueller report actually does do a good job of laying out what they were investigating and why, despite some of the latter being redacted.

The fact that there are still people making things up whole cloth, like you just tried to do again here, undermines the argument that it added no value.

Imagine how many lies Trumpkins like you would have gotten away with if there had been no investigation and report? You would probably be trying to convince me that Don Jr. and Jared met with a troupe of girl scouts in Trump Tower to negotiate the sale of thin mints. I’d suspect that’s the real reason you’re so mad about it.
 
… after waiting until May 2021 to even review.

Literally nobody will touch the work products of the esteemed Bobby Mueller. Not Congress in the impeachment articles. Not the FEC in this clearly major issue. The only feather in his hat is a white collar prosecution completely unrelated to his charter and happened a decade before the so called events he was charged to investigate. Oh and a couple of process crime equivalent of parking tickets.

But sure, you’ve informed us of another obviously major sin by Trump 🤡

The Muell didn't even touch his report until he was in front of congress stumbling over it.
 
The Mueller report actually does do a good job of laying out what they were investigating and why, despite some of the latter being redacted.

The fact that there are still people making things up whole cloth, like you just tried to do again here, undermines the argument that it added no value.

Imagine how many lies Trumpkins like you would have gotten away with if there had been no investigation and report? You would probably be trying to convince me that Don Jr. and Jared met with a troupe of girl scouts in Trump Tower to negotiate the sale of thin mints. I’d suspect that’s the real reason you’re so mad about it.
Don’t be so hard on yourself. It was so useful literally nobody will touch the work products.

And since Trump held serve with Bobby, we now get to see how Killary and Perkins Coie fare with Durham.
 
Don’t be so hard on yourself. It was so useful literally nobody will touch the work products.

And since Trump held serve with Bobby, we now get to see how Killary and Perkins Coie fare with Durham.

Just like almost every narrative during the 4 years is slowly being put to light. Nobody cares now though
 
I'm sure there's a lot of dirt on Trump that could be dug up that his fans would deny as truth. He's not a good person. Same could be said for most politicians. We saw a lot of that with Hillary as well. Luther still denies a lot of messed up **** she did and screams "right wing propaganda conspiracy!". Funny how both sides scream their person is innocent, but the other side's person is guilty as hell. Anyway, I don't trust the Mueller Report, mostly because of its origins. I'm sure Trump did some corrupt things, but the credibility of that report is suspect IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
Man, you really lied out your ass when you claimed you’d read the report.

It's been over a year. And again how do those convictions line up with your comment:

my point that campaign finance violations were not a priority or significant to the predicate for the investigation.
 
Don’t be so hard on yourself. It was so useful literally nobody will touch the work products.

And since Trump held serve with Bobby, we now get to see how Killary and Perkins Coie fare with Durham.

I don’t have any issue with whatever comes of the Durham investigation although, from what I’ve heard you’re going to get blue-balls again from the Sussman indictment. The only witness to his statement has previously testified under oath that he’s unsure he even said what he’s accused of saying.

That should make you happy since you think “process crimes” shouldn’t be prosecuted.
 
I'm sure there's a lot of dirt on Trump that could be dug up that his fans would deny as truth. He's not a good person. Same could be said for most politicians. We saw a lot of that with Hillary as well. Luther still denies a lot of messed up **** she did and screams "right wing propaganda conspiracy!". Funny how both sides scream their person is innocent, but the other side's person is guilty as hell. Anyway, I don't trust the Mueller Report, mostly because of its origins. I'm sure Trump did some corrupt things, but the credibility of that report is suspect IMO.
Have you read the Mueller report? The rationalization that " all politicians are the same" is BS. There are different levels of corruptness. Plus, some people have class and some don't
 
I'm sure there's a lot of dirt on Trump that could be dug up that his fans would deny as truth. He's not a good person. Same could be said for most politicians. We saw a lot of that with Hillary as well. Luther still denies a lot of messed up **** she did and screams "right wing propaganda conspiracy!". Funny how both sides scream their person is innocent, but the other side's person is guilty as hell. Anyway, I don't trust the Mueller Report, mostly because of its origins. I'm sure Trump did some corrupt things, but the credibility of that report is suspect IMO.
Oh I don’t think Trump is innocent by a long shot. But the Bobby Muller Fishing Expedition was completely un predicated and purely politically motivated without any desire to find any truth other than the preconceived finding that Killary was supposed to win and Trump stole the prize from her and the Dems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
I don’t have any issue with whatever comes of the Durham investigation although, from what I’ve heard you’re going to get blue-balls again from the Sussman indictment. The only witness to his statement has previously testified under oath that he’s unsure he even said what he’s accused of saying.

That should make you happy since you think “process crimes” shouldn’t be prosecuted.
Sure… 😂🤡
 
Have you read the Mueller report? The rationalization that " all politicians are the same" is BS. There are different levels of corruptness. Plus, some people have class and some don't
Oh, Trump has zero class. I've read more of the report than Mueller apparently. And I'd put Hillary's corruptness many notches higher on the corruption continuum.
 
It's been over a year. And again how do those convictions line up with your comment:

Been over a year for me, too. I didn’t completely forget the entire first half of volume 1 and everything that happened to lead up to the investigation.

The predicate is the set of facts that gave rise to suspicion for the primary investigation.

Campaign finance violations, bank fraud, lying to Congress etc were additional items that they uncovered. These were frequently used to attempt to leverage people to give more information about the primary investigation.
 
Been over a year for me, too. I didn’t completely forget the entire first half of volume 1 and everything that happened to lead up to the investigation.

The predicate is the set of facts that gave rise to suspicion for the primary investigation.

Campaign finance violations, bank fraud, lying to Congress etc were additional items that they uncovered. These were frequently used to attempt to leverage people to give more information about the primary investigation.

Sorry but that doesn't jive with your argument of why they didn't attempt a prosecution for the meeting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40

VN Store



Back
Top