W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 133,226
- Likes
- 348,950
Of course. All anyone can do is base their opinions on the best available information.Depends on where we are on that timeline. You assume we are on the discovery portion but could be smack in the middle of the wrong portion. Fun thing about the future, you never know what we may discover.
This isnt me giving on opinion on global warming but rather the **** argument of "but science says" Could it be true? Sure. Could it be false? Definitely.
I don't think you understand what her constituency consists of. She would be reelected easily if she ran (I doubt there would even be a primary challenge - and that's all that matters). I do think she will be fielding offers from television and will accept one of them. Your bar tending comment does reveal resentment, which I alluded to earlier.Megan McCain would have her crying in a corner balled up in the fetal position within 3 shows.
Look we’ve had almost a year since her primary coronation. If she had any real intellect or political savvy she would be up the politics curve some. She’s still right where she was a year ago. She still gets locked up when quizzed on the means to implement her ideas. She has demonstrated zero intellect thus far.
She’s one and done and headed back to bar tending. If you guys keep her around it will just be to keep from admitting defeat on her lunacy.
I don't think you understand what her constituency consists of. She would be reelected easily if she ran (I doubt there would even be a primary challenge - and that's all that matters). I do think she will be fielding offers from television and will accept one of them. Your bar tending comment does reveal resentment, which I alluded to earlier.
You bring up an excellent point, no service provider should be required to render services to those that cannot pay. Fix that and we are way down the road on reducing costs.
Try poverty. I dare you.
My degree is in marketing with a focus on statistical marketing. Meaning analysis of polls, focus groups, etc. You know, the nerds that give the quantitative data that shows brown toothpaste is a bad idea? Isolated polls aren't worth the internet space they occupy. You should know that. Me going to the KKK rally to poll 500 people about affirmative action wont give me a representation of the population. Allow me to refer you to CNNs polls on who was favored to win the presidency. Their polls were too isolated. How do I know that? Trump won.
Literally lived in a family that has went from middle class to poverty to working class and that's largely where I am personally.
Now, let's look at the fact that I have EARNED a bachelor's (close to my Masters) with no debt in a rather hard field of study. Didn't have my parents pay a penny, got no help from the government either. 100% merit scholarship and work.
Honestly, when most people politically minded hear my story they think that I'm a conservative because of my story. I am oh too happy to explain why that assumption couldn't be more wrong.
Hmm... you can also apply that to the left wing. Anything against their beliefs they turn into mobs over.. ya know.. Berkley.. Antifa.. just sayingUnless you are arguing certain state polls or outlying national polls. The vast majority of polls were correct. The right wing in this country just hates anything that even sounds like it's against their beliefs (which in reality who wins the polls/total vote doesn't matter because of the EC).
If you want, you can attack the importance of the polls, but not their validity.
As for sampling size, you have to strike a balance between ease of conduct and size. I try to look at 1000 plus, I agree under 500 is rather low.