Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Which proves without a doubt you have no clue what you're talking about. You're the definition of a low information voter the GOP relies on

I asked twice for this supposed data you had you were using to back up a stance in another thread.

You never gave it to me so we could dissect it because you are full of it.

You also responded to another poster and even when I asked again never produced your data.

You are a hack and everyone on here knows it. You pretend to be educated and have the audacity to tell someone to take a college class so they can somehow be on your level.

Your insults and constant talking down to people on here is pathetic.

Grow up.
 
Vulgarity sure. Name calling not so much. @McDad and I have several sweetie names for each other that would probably get picked up for name calling. And a good chunk of us can just be guys throwing out insults at each other and not meaning a thing as we are comfortable around each other.

Not saying it doesnt go too far and doesnt get tiresome, I can only say no to McDad so many times before I am over it.

But it still boils down to balls and strikes.
That's not what is being suggested at all. They both like to whine all the time about how opinions get censored which is a lie. Dropping fbombs and calling someone an ahole in anger and it will get removed. That's consistent across the board whether some like it or not
 
I asked twice for this supposed data you had you were using to back up a stance in another thread.

You never gave it to me so we could dissect it because you are full of it.

You also responded to another poster and even when I asked again never produced your data.

You are a hack and everyone on here knows it. You pretend to be educated and have the audacity to tell someone to take a college class so they can somehow be on your level.

Your insults and constant talking down to people on here is pathetic.

Grow up.
A post full of insults calling me pathetic for my insults? Hmmmm

Maybe I simply didn't care enough about your point to look anything up. Maybe I never saw your reply. You're a big boy and can find google

I also didn't suggest a college class for jussie as I'm sure a basic govt course would do. His stalking it's terrible because he lacks even a basic understanding of politics in the US.
 
A post full of insults calling me pathetic for my insults? Hmmmm

Maybe I simply didn't care enough about your point to look anything up. Maybe I never saw your reply. You're a big boy and can find google

I also didn't suggest a college class for jussie as I'm sure a basic govt course would do. His stalking it's terrible because he lacks even a basic understanding of politics in the US.

You saw my post and you avoided it because you lied about your data.

Just admit you are a fraud and we can move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
That's not what is being suggested at all. They both like to whine all the time about how opinions get censored which is a lie. Dropping fbombs and calling someone an ahole in anger and it will get removed. That's consistent across the board whether some like it or not
That's still balls and strikes which was the quote. Even if you were 100% on what are balls vs strikes you would still be making that call. Not sure why you want to deny it.
 
You should see someone about your AOCDS.

LOL....that's what this here thread's about bozo....we're posting stupid stuff coming from the young idiot's mouth.
She's a congresswoman who has no intellect about anything but her feelings. You bash Trump on a 24/7 daily basis in all threads but this is where we bash stupid libs like AOC in this thread......get over it.
 
A post full of insults calling me pathetic for my insults? Hmmmm

Maybe I simply didn't care enough about your point to look anything up. Maybe I never saw your reply. You're a big boy and can find google

I also didn't suggest a college class for jussie as I'm sure a basic govt course would do. His stalking it's terrible because he lacks even a basic understanding of politics in the US.
huff that you? or you simply can't come up with your own insults?
 
What does that matter? It's not a freaking team competition. Let's all just work toward fewer wars. Sound good?

I probably should have included your other post about defense. I agree with you about wars generally. There are a few instances where our participation was necessary to prevent a greater evil, but to me that doesn't cover war with a country just because they sponsor terrorism. The best defense is a great offense doesn't really work that way ... especially against third world countries. Defense is expensive, and all too often GOP spending for defense is out of line because Dems cut defense spending and left us with an atrophied military.
 
That's still balls and strikes which was the quote. Even if you were 100% on what are balls vs strikes you would still be making that call. Not sure why you want to deny it.

He has not figured out yet that it is the quickest/easiest way to get bust his balls and get him on his heels. Seems like if he did not want the responsibility/authority he would give it up or own it as you suggest.
 
That's still balls and strikes which was the quote. Even if you were 100% on what are balls vs strikes you would still be making that call. Not sure why you want to deny it.
You do realize there are others that can do the same right? It's an outright lie that things get deleted because of am unpopular opinion. That's what he was referencing. Not sure why you want to deny it.
 
He has not figured out yet that it is the quickest/easiest way to get bust his balls and get him on his heels. Seems like if he did not want the responsibility/authority he would give it up or own it as you suggest.
It's also against freaks rules that you seem to not gaf about. That's also why it keeps getting removed
 
He has not figured out yet that it is the quickest/easiest way to get bust his balls and get him on his heels. Seems like if he did not want the responsibility/authority he would give it up or own it as you suggest.
What gives? Is he preventing you guys from saying something you would like to say?

So what if he is essentialy tasked with being the forum janitor and wiping off the graffiti.. Oh, the injustice
 
You do realize there are others that can do the same right? It's an outright lie that things get deleted because of am unpopular opinion. That's what he was referencing. Not sure why you want to deny it.
I went and looked at the quote.

He was talking about you not arguing with the other side and the bias he thinks you have. At least in what you quoted. Seems like there are multiple points being brought up. Seems like some could be complete bs as you stated, while others are true (balls vs strikes) as he stated.
 
I went and looked at the quote.

He was talking about you not arguing with the other side and the bias he thinks you have. At least in what you quoted. Seems like there are multiple points being brought up. Seems like some could be complete bs as you stated, while others are true (balls vs strikes) as he stated.
It's not just today it's a tiring pattern.
 
What gives? Is he preventing you guys from saying something you would like to say?

So what if he is essentialy tasked with being the forum janitor and wiping off the graffiti.. Oh, the injustice
It tends to kill off any real discussion. You cant even bring up what gets wiped out. Makes conversation with others difficult if its half gone or what you are replying to is gone. Not saying no modding, just pointing to reality.

Pretty sure there are others who take care of our mess without getting personal about it. And I would see it as darn near impossible to avoid cries of bias if one is mpodding a conversation they are actively engaged in. Like people thinking trump interfered in the investigation The implication is.enough to be damaging.
 
It tends to kill off any real discussion. You cant even bring up what gets wiped out. Makes conversation with others difficult if its half gone or what you are replying to is gone. Not saying no modding, just pointing to reality.
then address it with the person who did it. It's difficult for me when I make a comment and then get called out and attacked for something that got deleted when I wasn't even on. But hey, continue to direct it at me since I'm here and not hiding
And I would see it as darn near impossible to avoid cries of bias if one is mpodding a conversation they are actively engaged in. Like people thinking trump interfered in the investigation The implication is.enough to be damaging.
Even more difficult when you weren't the one

You do realize it's not the mods fault a post gets deleted right?
 
If libertarians ever want success, they have to find some electable people and do more than show up for a few months every four years. Since I first met a hardcore libertarian about 50 years ago, I can honestly say I've never met a libertarian that wasn't a wacko. The concept is great; the people are nuttier than fruitcakes.
And therein lies the problem. A sane libertarian would get elected in a landslide if he didn't get Hillarycided first.
 

VN Store



Back
Top