volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,654
- Likes
- 23,622
Which proves without a doubt you have no clue what you're talking about. You're the definition of a low information voter the GOP relies on
That's not what is being suggested at all. They both like to whine all the time about how opinions get censored which is a lie. Dropping fbombs and calling someone an ahole in anger and it will get removed. That's consistent across the board whether some like it or notVulgarity sure. Name calling not so much. @McDad and I have several sweetie names for each other that would probably get picked up for name calling. And a good chunk of us can just be guys throwing out insults at each other and not meaning a thing as we are comfortable around each other.
Not saying it doesnt go too far and doesnt get tiresome, I can only say no to McDad so many times before I am over it.
But it still boils down to balls and strikes.
A post full of insults calling me pathetic for my insults? HmmmmI asked twice for this supposed data you had you were using to back up a stance in another thread.
You never gave it to me so we could dissect it because you are full of it.
You also responded to another poster and even when I asked again never produced your data.
You are a hack and everyone on here knows it. You pretend to be educated and have the audacity to tell someone to take a college class so they can somehow be on your level.
Your insults and constant talking down to people on here is pathetic.
Grow up.
A post full of insults calling me pathetic for my insults? Hmmmm
Maybe I simply didn't care enough about your point to look anything up. Maybe I never saw your reply. You're a big boy and can find google
I also didn't suggest a college class for jussie as I'm sure a basic govt course would do. His stalking it's terrible because he lacks even a basic understanding of politics in the US.
That's still balls and strikes which was the quote. Even if you were 100% on what are balls vs strikes you would still be making that call. Not sure why you want to deny it.That's not what is being suggested at all. They both like to whine all the time about how opinions get censored which is a lie. Dropping fbombs and calling someone an ahole in anger and it will get removed. That's consistent across the board whether some like it or not
You should see someone about your AOCDS.
huff that you? or you simply can't come up with your own insults?A post full of insults calling me pathetic for my insults? Hmmmm
Maybe I simply didn't care enough about your point to look anything up. Maybe I never saw your reply. You're a big boy and can find google
I also didn't suggest a college class for jussie as I'm sure a basic govt course would do. His stalking it's terrible because he lacks even a basic understanding of politics in the US.
What does that matter? It's not a freaking team competition. Let's all just work toward fewer wars. Sound good?
That's still balls and strikes which was the quote. Even if you were 100% on what are balls vs strikes you would still be making that call. Not sure why you want to deny it.
You do realize there are others that can do the same right? It's an outright lie that things get deleted because of am unpopular opinion. That's what he was referencing. Not sure why you want to deny it.That's still balls and strikes which was the quote. Even if you were 100% on what are balls vs strikes you would still be making that call. Not sure why you want to deny it.
It's also against freaks rules that you seem to not gaf about. That's also why it keeps getting removedHe has not figured out yet that it is the quickest/easiest way to get bust his balls and get him on his heels. Seems like if he did not want the responsibility/authority he would give it up or own it as you suggest.
What gives? Is he preventing you guys from saying something you would like to say?He has not figured out yet that it is the quickest/easiest way to get bust his balls and get him on his heels. Seems like if he did not want the responsibility/authority he would give it up or own it as you suggest.
I went and looked at the quote.You do realize there are others that can do the same right? It's an outright lie that things get deleted because of am unpopular opinion. That's what he was referencing. Not sure why you want to deny it.
It's not just today it's a tiring pattern.I went and looked at the quote.
He was talking about you not arguing with the other side and the bias he thinks you have. At least in what you quoted. Seems like there are multiple points being brought up. Seems like some could be complete bs as you stated, while others are true (balls vs strikes) as he stated.
It tends to kill off any real discussion. You cant even bring up what gets wiped out. Makes conversation with others difficult if its half gone or what you are replying to is gone. Not saying no modding, just pointing to reality.What gives? Is he preventing you guys from saying something you would like to say?
So what if he is essentialy tasked with being the forum janitor and wiping off the graffiti.. Oh, the injustice
then address it with the person who did it. It's difficult for me when I make a comment and then get called out and attacked for something that got deleted when I wasn't even on. But hey, continue to direct it at me since I'm here and not hidingIt tends to kill off any real discussion. You cant even bring up what gets wiped out. Makes conversation with others difficult if its half gone or what you are replying to is gone. Not saying no modding, just pointing to reality.
Even more difficult when you weren't the oneAnd I would see it as darn near impossible to avoid cries of bias if one is mpodding a conversation they are actively engaged in. Like people thinking trump interfered in the investigation The implication is.enough to be damaging.
And therein lies the problem. A sane libertarian would get elected in a landslide if he didn't get Hillarycided first.If libertarians ever want success, they have to find some electable people and do more than show up for a few months every four years. Since I first met a hardcore libertarian about 50 years ago, I can honestly say I've never met a libertarian that wasn't a wacko. The concept is great; the people are nuttier than fruitcakes.