AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,590
- Likes
- 42,430
Well, they did manage to shut her down it seems. Free speech and all, right? They can dish it out but they can't take it.Think this has been posted somewhere in one of these threads not sure which one >>>'Mini AOC' ends parody videos after receiving 'death threats,' 'harassment' from the left, family says
THE INSANITY & HATE COMING FROM THE LEFT-WING LOONY BIRDS CAN"T TAKE THE HUMOR FROM AN 8 YEAR OLD CHILD. SHE & HER FAMILY HAVE RECEIVED DEATH THREATS FROM ADULTS W/MENTAL ILLNESS CALLED DTS.
Think this has been posted somewhere in one of these threads not sure which one >>>'Mini AOC' ends parody videos after receiving 'death threats,' 'harassment' from the left, family says
THE INSANITY & HATE COMING FROM THE LEFT-WING LOONY BIRDS CAN"T TAKE THE HUMOR FROM AN 8 YEAR OLD CHILD. SHE & HER FAMILY HAVE RECEIVED DEATH THREATS FROM ADULTS W/MENTAL ILLNESS CALLED DTS. DON'T FORGET THAT DEMOCRATS LOVE CHILDREN ONLY WHEN THEY HAVE POWER OVER THEM.
Democrat Rep. Frederica Wilson (FL) says that people who are “making fun of members of Congress” online “should be prosecuted”
LOL....I want Barn to arrest me (aka Luthie). Aaaannnnd I want to see his bullet.
AOC is a fraud... Pelosi is a fraud, Clinton is a crook... come at me bro.
Meaning of course he's going to defend his people, the border patrol agents. The question now becomes does he actually have this video evidence in his possession? If not, who gets to choose whether it's released or not, assuming of course it exists. If it exists, and the advocate does not have it in his possession, there's always the chance it could be suppressed by someone so as not to make AOC look bad.Because he’s an advocate, not a government official.
Is that right?You show your ignorance every time you disparage the NYT.
Nothing right about threats over some videos. However maybe parents should think twice about using their young children to push a political agenda.Think this has been posted somewhere in one of these threads not sure which one >>>'Mini AOC' ends parody videos after receiving 'death threats,' 'harassment' from the left, family says
THE INSANITY & HATE COMING FROM THE LEFT-WING LOONY BIRDS CAN"T TAKE THE HUMOR FROM AN 8 YEAR OLD CHILD. SHE & HER FAMILY HAVE RECEIVED DEATH THREATS FROM ADULTS W/MENTAL ILLNESS CALLED DTS. DON'T FORGET THAT DEMOCRATS LOVE CHILDREN ONLY WHEN THEY HAVE POWER OVER THEM.
Exactly. That’s why I was confused. The tweet said he was the “National Border Patrol VP” and I didn’t know what the National Border Patrol was.Why would a government official come out to discuss union members who are being targeted by AOC?
Waiting on the video over here....
No, they were just loony birds, lol.Nothing right about threats over some videos. However maybe parents should think twice about using their young children to push a political agenda.
Lane kiffin and his family received threats because he left a football coaching job. I don't think those were just from left wing loony birds.
I'll disparage the NYT. They are an anti-Semitic organization that ran an anti-Semitic cartoon recently, refused to cover the Holocaust during the 40s, and even before that tried to downplay Hitler's role in anti-Semitism.
They are a terrible news organization; they deserve every bit of hatred they get.
For normal people, it goes to how much weight to give his opinion.Does this mean that for once the Dims would reject the union voice? Sounds hypocritical to me ... free speech and all.
Oh FFS...It would be so wonderful if the left knew history or how to research things..
The NYT is and has been a propaganda machine for the DC 3 letter agencies for quite a while. There are sworn testimonies out there validating that.
Use that gray matter and go find out for yourself. I suggest starting back in the 1960's and working forward.
You might be shocked to learn that all MSM, video and print, are on a government payroll somewhere.
Not defending the previous remarks, but the NYT does slant left. There are very few news sources any more that don't slant one way or the other. Just as you reserve the right to call out someone posting info from a right leaning news source, others can call out the NYT as a left leaning news source. IMO, it's important to remember that sometimes, these news sources(on both sides) have an agenda.Facts are neo-cons worst enemies. Whose lies did you repeat here?
The NYT is own by Sulzberger family, which has Jewish roots, Arthur Sulzberger, a Reformed Jew, was publisher during the Holocaust. Pre-war, the NYT did not want to antagonize Hitler by calling him out for his actions against the Jews, which was a stance that many foreign newspapers took. The NYT covered the Holocaust but did not specify that Jews were being killed - only refugees. Lastly, Sulzberger believed using religion to describe Nazi victims was not fair or accurate.
Below is the cartoon. It depicts a blind Trump, wearing a yarmulke, being led around by Netanyahu, who is his little seeing-eye dog. I have two Jewish friends who said there is nothing anti-Semitic about the cartoon and I agree with them. It is political, not religious, satire.
![]()
You said it better than I did.Meaning of course he's going to defend his people, the border patrol agents. The question now becomes does he actually have this video evidence in his possession? If not, who gets to choose whether it's released or not, assuming of course it exists. If it exists, and the advocate does not have it in his possession, there's always the chance it could be suppressed by someone so as not to make AOC look bad.
In other words, believe nothing until you see it.