American war dead are "Losers and Suckers," per Trump

The only one I can think of is John Quincy Adams. I was a Mayor Pete fan during the primaries, but he clearly needs more experience to resonate with a wider audience. Perhaps when he's the Secretary of State under Biden that'll lend him good fortune come 2028.

Pete is better than Biden there’s no doubt. Gabbard and Yang were both on the stage as well. Crazy that we still elect the same crap that got us here.
 
Per the numbers you just cited, Trump is not doing as well among military members as most Republican Party nominees for President do. George W. Bush outraised John Kerry by more than this, which at face value, doesn't make much sense.
That Bush outraised Kerry? I know my uncles that were in Vietnam didn't like him...they thought he faked injuries to get the medals and later turned his back on vets...I wasn't there can't say...I joined the Marines but was highly allergic to bee stings so they wouldn't let me go..to my divorced mom's delight since I had to help her
 
When has anyone taken away the 2A? I am 40 + years old, and every election cycle, conservatives trot this out. At what point will you all wise up?
The assault weapons ban was an unconstitutional Pos that was passed under Clinton and was rightfully ended. Both Cali and NY have very overreaching laws. Fortunately the 9th just threw out the unconditional magazine ban in California. The challenge to the New York law likely ends up at SCOTUS. You’re a fool who doesn’t value your rights if you can’t see the relentless attack on the 2A.
I promise you if the people of Weimar Germany could do it again they would not give up their rights to self defense with a gun either
edit: California didn’t challenge to SCOTUS because they knew they’d lose. They’re hoping to wait on a leftist President to stack the court.
 
The assault weapons ban was an unconstitutional Pos that was passed under Clinton and was rightfully ended. Both Cali and NY have very overreaching laws. Fortunately the 9th just threw out the unconditional magazine ban in California. The challenge to the New York law likely ends up at SCOTUS. You’re a fool who doesn’t value your rights if you can’t see the relentless attack on the 2A.
I promise you if the people of Weimar Germany could do it again they would not give up their rights to self defense with a gun either
Really strange thinking the 9th circuit is now a moderate/conservative bench...for years they were ultra liberal...I still hate that courts are political at all 9th Circuit Court Panel Ends California Ban On High-Capacity Magazines
 
Seriously
Cameltoe Harris said she’d write an ex order to take away all guns. Beto said “hell yes we’re going to take guns away. Biden said he’s putting Beto in charge of gun control.
I can’t imagine why people who care about and want to keep their 2A rights would think the Dims wants to take them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
More evidence of Trump's veteran hatred
The losers and suckers comment might be about his base. He used our military veterans to front a scam for almost $3 million.

Judge Says Trump Must Pay $2 Million Over Misuse Of Foundation Funds

The case is tied to a televised fundraiser for veterans held by Trump in Iowa when he was running for president in January 2016. Trump had said the funds raised would be distributed to charities. But according to court documents, the Trump Foundation improperly used $2.82 million it received from that fundraiser.
 
The losers and suckers comment might be about his base. He used our military veterans to front a scam for almost $3 million.

Judge Says Trump Must Pay $2 Million Over Misuse Of Foundation Funds

The case is tied to a televised fundraiser for veterans held by Trump in Iowa when he was running for president in January 2016. Trump had said the funds raised would be distributed to charities. But according to court documents, the Trump Foundation improperly used $2.82 million it received from that fundraiser.

Yghn
 
More evidence of Trump's veteran hatred

That is Donald Trump doing what he would do for anyone in attendance at one of his rallies. Donald Trump is egocentric, and completely self-absorbed. Trump's positive feelings for anyone are not unconditional, but rather they are completely dependent on the other person expressing a positive sentiment for him first. If Donald Trump's feelings for American veterans were only based on their service and sacrifice for our country, then he would have never said the "He's a hero because he was captured. I like heroes who weren't captured," statement about John McCain. I understand you will just use that to say negative things about McCain, but that statement really does taint Donald Trump. It was an incredibly stupid thing to say about American POW's, and Donald Trump has never retracted it. Sure, Donald Trump likes veterans... as long as they demonstrate that they like him first. Otherwise, they are no different to him than anyone else who doesn't like him is. Whenever a veteran is critical of Donald Trump, he is not above calling them a "loser".

When it comes to Donald Trump admiring veterans, it's not their military service that matters, it's completely based on whether or not they demonstrate that they like Trump first. If they don't like him, they are automatically a loser like everyone else.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
@Tyler Durden
Eisenhower was the most recent Baldy

Truman looked like he might have had a bald spot in the back. I'm really not trying to start some political fight about hair, but I think Trump's 'do is covering a bald patch.

Edit: we don't know what Washington, Jefferson, et al were sporting under those wigs.
 
@Tyler Durden
Eisenhower was the most recent Baldy
The most recent bald President is Donald Trump. I don't think we should count the hair weave, which he has dyed yellow - with his eye brows... all while wearing porcelain veneers for teeth and a bronzing spray for his face and hands. As a 74 year old man, Trump goes to more lengths in the name of vanity than any First Lady we have ever had - except for getting some exercise and losing his fat belly that is.
 
We would both like to think that is true but the Republican Senators and House members will go down with Trump if the unknown sources come out and declare the accuracy of the Atlantic article

They bailed in the house on impeachment and they bailed in the Senate by preventing witnesses and failing to permit a guilty finding

And it’s clear that the two handfuls of Dotard supporters on this Forum won’t give a sh!t either just as NOT ONE OF THEM has addressed the parallel comparison to how they responded to General Mathis’ comments. Well except Onelilreb manned up by at least acknowledging But dodging the issues raised by Mathis

It’s too late all will go down with Trump

On the political front they will simply fight over who is to become the next Trump-like swamp creature in 2024. There is quite a lengthy list of candidates
Mathis, huh? Sounds legit
 
Truman looked like he might have had a bald spot in the back. I'm really not trying to start some political fight about hair, but I think Trump's 'do is covering a bald patch.

Edit: we don't know what Washington, Jefferson, et al were sporting under those wigs.
Those guys didn't have the option of a hair weave either... and I don't think spray tans were en vogue for men back then.
 
Is that supposed to be proof of something? You really don't believe that Kelly is a source for these allegations? You are the ultimate Trump apologist and boot licker. Yeah, it's totally plausible that you used to be a Democrat, with the hard on you carry around for Donald Trump.
Slice isn’t a Trump apologist
 
I'm being honest here...I don't think he said it or was misquoted. Especially don't see him saying it in front of Kelly


Please. Not only would he be willing to say it in front of him, but he'd relish the chance to remind Kelly of his superiority over him.

That's why Kelly couldn't take it anymore. Trump takes pride in being a jerk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
Slice isn’t a Trump apologist
He gives the pretense of being a former Democrat... but that is not consistent with anything he has ever posted. And he does go to considerable lengths to defend Trump, which only makes sense for a diehard supporter. Nobody who has switched parties, is going to be that tribal in nature for the other side. He is a passionate conservative and Trump supporter. That is not consistent with being a former Democrat.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: titansvolsfaninga
He gives the pretense of being a former Democrat... but that is not consistent with anything he has ever posted. And he does go to considerable lengths to defend Trump, which only makes sense for a diehard supporter. Nobody who has switched parties, is going to be that tribal in nature for the other side. He is a passionate conservative and Trump supporter. That is not consistent with being a former Democrat.
@Orangeslice13 did you know any of this?
 

VN Store



Back
Top