American war dead are "Losers and Suckers," per Trump

#1,776
#1,776
USAFgolferVol said:
Kelly was asked about it and said, "no comment", which means Trump probably said it. He would have denied it had Trump not said it. Most of the people in that entourage probably weren't standing around close enough to hear everything dumb Donald said. Again, because he has said SO MANY things like this, it's much more likely that's it's true than a lie
Click to expand...

Or it’s so stupid he wasn’t going to justify it
 
#1,778
#1,778
Orangeslice13 said:
Or it’s so stupid he wasn’t going to justify it
Click to expand...
If you don't believe that John Kelly is a source for these allegations at this point... then you need to look no further than the nearest mirror to find "stupid". Are you capable of deductive reasoning at all? At this point, you just look like a blind idiot, if you don't think it's him. Kelly is obviously a source.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#1,779
#1,779
BowlBrother85 said:
I don't believe that one facet discredits an entire story. There were aspects of Woodward and Bernstein's reporting on the Watergate break-in and cover up that were not accurate. That didn't mean that EVERYTHING else was false. "Anybody with any common sense" should be able to deduce by now that John Kelly has been at least one of the sources for these allegations. As a career military serviceman, Kelly is highly credible, and he was in a position to have heard what was said. Kelly is not a political hack. The average person would take the word of John Kelly in a minute over the word of Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Stephen Miller and Dan Bongino.

Jennifer Griffin referred to one of her sources as "umimpeachable". Who else could that include among former Trump Administration Officials, if not John Kelly? Look at Donald Trump's tweets over the weekend, he clearly believes that John Kelly is one of the sources for this story.

Having said that, Jeffrey Goldberg has promised that there would be more corroborating evidence brought forward in the coming days and weeks to confirm his reporting. If nothing surfaces, then he was just blowing smoke. We will just have to wait and see...
Click to expand...
Nice. Two lines triggers a wall of reactionary text. I’m getting more efficient.

Gone like a fart on the wind BB. Sux for you I know 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave
#1,782
#1,782
lawgator1 said:
You guys defending Trump would be right if the standard of proof here was something akin to proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but of course that is not the standard here.

The proof amounts to:

1) Trump's claims at the time as to why he did not go to the site are not very credible.
2) Trump has previously made very insensitive and disparaging comments on the record concerning the military.
3) Multiple unknown sources claim he said it. And that is coming from reporting by multiple news agencies, including the one most stalwart in their prior defense of Trump. The reporters confirming this after the Atlantic are professional and cite sources that would know.

As I have said before, if someone does come forward and is willing to be identified then Trump's campaign goose is absolutely cooked. A lot of politicians will be forced to cut and run from him as he is so toxic already and this would be the last straw for a number of them. But even if that ultimately does not happen, the biggest problem for Trump may well be that its not hard to envision him having said these things. It is consistent with his character, or lack thereof.
Click to expand...


We would both like to think that is true but the Republican Senators and House members will go down with Trump if the unknown sources come out and declare the accuracy of the Atlantic article

They bailed in the house on impeachment and they bailed in the Senate by preventing witnesses and failing to permit a guilty finding

And it’s clear that the two handfuls of Dotard supporters on this Forum won’t give a sh!t either just as NOT ONE OF THEM has addressed the parallel comparison to how they responded to General Mathis’ comments. Well except Onelilreb manned up by at least acknowledging But dodging the issues raised by Mathis

It’s too late all will go down with Trump

On the political front they will simply fight over who is to become the next Trump-like swamp creature in 2024. There is quite a lengthy list of candidates
 
#1,783
#1,783
USAFgolferVol said:
Kelly was asked about it and said, "no comment", which means Trump probably said it. He would have denied it had Trump not said it. Most of the people in that entourage probably weren't standing around close enough to hear everything dumb Donald said. Again, because he has said SO MANY things like this, it's much more likely that's it's true than a lie
Click to expand...
Of course, he would have! These people are idiots!
 
Last edited:
#1,784
#1,784
BowlBrother85 said:
If you don't believe that John Kelly is a source for these allegations at this point... then you need to look no further than the nearest mirror to find "stupid". Are you capable of deductive reasoning at all? At this point, you just look like a blind idiot, if you don't think it's him. Kelly is obviously a source.
Click to expand...
The hope spring is eternal.
Keep up the faith
I’m sure these sources aren’t made
 
#1,785
#1,785
Orangeslice13 said:
The hope spring is eternal.
Keep up the faith
I’m sure these sources aren’t made
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'm sure that Jennifer Griffin of Fox News called a fictional source "unimpeachable". That makes so much sense. If you don't think that John Kelly is a source for these allegations, then you are more stupid than any adult human being should be. Again, read Donald Trump's tweets from over the weekend. Trump obviously believes that John Kelly is a source for this reporting.
 
#1,786
#1,786
BowlBrother85 said:
Yeah, I'm sure that Jennifer Griffin of Fox News called a fictional source "unimpeachable". That makes so much sense. If you don't think that John Kelly is a source for these allegations, then you are more stupid than any adult human being should be. Again, read Donald Trump's tweets from over the weekend. Trump obviously believes that John Kelly is a source for this reporting.
Click to expand...

Keep the faith.
I personally think the source is Biden. He’s a coward that would not want to go on the record
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#1,789
#1,789
Tyler Durden said:
When are the Clintons going to be arrested?
Click to expand...

Just because they have not been does not mean they should not have been.
I think most are wasting time thinking Maxwell or anyone else has damaging video evidence on Bill or Hillary. The way they have skated thru crime they must be the one's with the damaging videos on everyone else.
 
#1,795
#1,795
evillawyer said:
It's not that hard. Trump has provided us with plenty of evidence to believe that the alleged comments would be completely consistent with the other garbage he's on camera saying.
Click to expand...
Trump even denied calling John McCain a loser. He is on video, and even sent a tweet calling McCain a loser. These idiots will believe anything he says, even though he is a proven liar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother, lawgator1 and Tyler Durden
#1,796
#1,796
BowlBrother85 said:
Is that supposed to be proof of something? You really don't believe that Kelly is a source for these allegations? You are the ultimate Trump apologist and boot licker. Yeah, it's total plausible that you used to be a Democrat, with the hard on you carry around for Donald Trump.
Click to expand...
Awww are you getting mad.
Why don’t you throw around some more kiddy porn accusation.

No. It’s made up until 2 credible sources go on the record. You can’t even find one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01, VolnJC, NorthDallas40 and 1 other person
#1,798
#1,798
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother and BowlBrother85
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top