Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court

[StarRaider]

I'd also be down for a pay-per-view of Dan Crenshaw and Jim Jordan tag team against Adam Schiff and Steve Cohen.

Chairs optional.

Jordan is a 2xNCAA National Champ so I am taking the Champ and the USN SEAL over pencil neck and chicken neck

 

[AM64]

Is there a point?
Do you guys understand what precedent means?

Far far better than your band of lunatics understands the word "progressive" or the more basic term "progress".

 

[VolStrom]

Never forget this sham.

 

[utvolpj]

Is there a point?
Do you guys understand what precedent means?

I do. I also know you ignore it when convenient (ie when your argument fails)

 

[luthervol]

I do. I also know you ignore it when convenient (ie when your argument fails)

Hopefully I'm not one to claim historical precedent when the reality shows anything but that.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Never forget this sham.

This one is better. Turn up the volume.

 

[lawgator1]

Never forget this sham.

The sham was the GOP protecting Trump from himself. A mistake that they will regret soon enough.

 

[utvolpj]

Hopefully I'm not one to claim historical precedent when the reality shows anything but that.

You ignore the precent set by near unanimous condemnation when FDR got his socialist feelings hurt and tried the same. Anyone who supports this move wants to invalidate the separation of powers and the basis of our govt. This was not meant as a political ploy

 

[85SugarVol]

That's what the repubs are bringing on us by stealing a seat.

You can certainly argue and believe that what the Republicans did was inherently unfair. You’ll get no argument from me.

But if the Democrats regain control, and pack the court, it won’t be the Republicans “doing it”. It will forever and always be the Democrats that literally packed the court.

 

[VolnJC]

Lefties wanting to cancel Feinstein

 

[37L1]

Lefties wanting to cancel Feinstein

Do you think she dyes her hair?

 

[VolStrom]

Do you think she dyes her hair?

If she doesn't I'm moving to Kalifornia.

 

[TNVOLNAVY]

Lefties wanting to cancel Feinstein

The saddest part is that she thinks she really did something good for America all those years in office.

 

[LouderVol]

You planning to be the referee?

He's Blue

 

[LouderVol]

Do you even hear yourself?
Andrew Jackson - 1866.
We're talking more than 150 years ago.....and Andrew Jackson at the conclusion of the Civil War.

And...legal precedent goes back that far. It's kinda the basis of blacks being a free people. But I guess that is irrelevant precedent because its old. I think we even go back to 1776 on some stuff....

You dont like it, so you claim there is a problem, even after acknowledging historical precedence.

 

[37L1]

Do you even hear yourself?
Andrew Jackson - 1866.
We're talking more than 150 years ago.....and Andrew Jackson at the conclusion of the Civil War.

luther, Andrew Jackson died in 1845.

 

[AM64]

luther, Andrew Jackson died in 1845.

Maybe he's a school teacher confusing Jacksons and Johnsons?

 

[37L1]

Maybe he's a school teacher confusing Jacksons and Johnsons?

I bet you luther is confused by johnsons.

 

[AM64]

I bet you luther is confused by johnsons.

Seems like most libs are confused by johnsons these days.

 

[rocytop2624]

They haven't stolen anything. Elections have consequences. Don't fool yourself. The Dems would have done the same if the situation was reversed.

everyone knows this like they know Trump has condemned racism. But the left keeps saying Trump hasn't.

 

[rocytop2624]

The sham was the GOP protecting Trump from himself. A mistake that they will regret soon enough.

When Trump wins will you finally realize that Nancy and the Dems are the definition of sham.

 

[85SugarVol]

I guess we'll never know.
When was the last time the Senate refused to vote on a supreme court nominee?

Out of curiosity- What would your position be if the Republicans had allowed the vote, and the Democrats had fallen short of the votes to confirm?

 

[luthervol]

And...legal precedent goes back that far. It's kinda the basis of blacks being a free people. But I guess that is irrelevant precedent because its old. I think we even go back to 1776 on some stuff....

You dont like it, so you claim there is a problem, even after acknowledging historical precedence.

It's that the past 150 years of precedent overrides what happened under Andrew Johnson at the end of the Civil war.
When you look at precedent, you start in the present and work your way back.

 

[luthervol]

luther, Andrew Jackson died in 1845.

Make that Johnson

 

[1972 Grad]

Seems like most libs are confused by johnsons these days.

Speaking of Johnsons, who knew there were so many crooked ones? There are ads on tv all the time for Peyronie's Disease.