ATLVolFan06
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2015
- Messages
- 255
- Likes
- 466
Please, explain.
I think Dawn has had better luck than Holly. Holly would've had her final four had it not been for injuries. The injuries go all the way back to the year with Taber Spani. Dawn is offensively challenged, she was lucky getting two very talented guards that could thrive despite a real offensive scheme, in fact that only really happened after Coates was injured (more space to create). Holly didnt have the guards Dawn had but offensively UT looked better. Dawn had a easier route to the final 4 (luck). Not having to face UCONN (luck). However, coaching wise i think theyre pretty much the same.
So Holly was unlucky because of injuries, and Dawn was lucky because her 2nd best player got injured and she had to completely change her offensive and defensive gameplan at the 11th hour to address the loss of one of her team's cornerstones. Dawn is lucky that she got two talented guards that were good enough to overcome her sh!tty coaching, but Holly was unlucky that her two MORE TALENTED guards could not get her past the 2nd round.
Got it.
Dawn didnt completely change her offense. They still didn't set screens, she had guards that could create, the absence of Coates gave the guards more space to do so. Sorry but SC's guards were better than ours.... She was definitely lucky to get Gray and Davis anyone who thinks otherwise is Nuts. Without the transfers SC wouldve struggled on the perimeter especially since T Mitchell graduated. Dawns Player recruitment, player development, offensive & defensive schemes have not been better than ours. She's been lucky to receive transfers that covered her inability to really coach
How come everyone is saying not to count on our FRESHMEN but Dawn will have success and no problem with her freshmen taking two starting positions over and winning again?
Their #24 and 47 and 54 is better than our #2---#9...#12????
There's no guarantee your freshman will see significant playing time. With Deshields, Russell, Cooper, and Nared coming back, minutes will be at a premium. SC just lost 4 players, and 3 starters off their roster. I'm not even going to touch the whole coaching thing. Lol
There's no guarantee your freshman will see significant playing time. With Deshields, Russell, Cooper, and Nared coming back, minutes will be at a premium. SC just lost 4 players, and 3 starters off their roster. I'm not even going to touch the whole coaching thing. Lol
The post was about freshmen being counted on for positive contributions. Not for just getting playing time! Are you saying that your freshmen will be good because they play more minutes?
Kaela Davis and Allisha Gray are better than Diamond and Jaime? That's bull and everyone, including you, knows that. Which ones made the All-SEC teams and which ones didn't?
SC completely changed their offensive game. They ran the high-low between Coates/Wilson all day before Alaina got hurt, and completely removed that from their arsenal because they didn't have any players good enough to do that consistently. Herbert Harrigan started a few games in Alaina's absence, but got benched in favor of Cuevas-Moore because she was bogging down the offense. Dawn was also smart enough to know when to use her bigs and when to use her wings. During the FSU and ASU games when A'ja was in foul trouble, she ran more plays to free up Kaela for open shots. Cliney is about as good of a screen setter as there is in the SEC.
I was about to say that Dawn was "lucky" to get Allisha and Kaela the same way Holly was "lucky" to get Diamond, but the difference is that Dawn capitalized on her talent and Holly didn't. And despite Holly being a failure as a coach the last two years, she was "lucky" that top recruits didn't let her failure prevent them from thinking that they could turn things around.
On the subject of player development, how many first team AAs has Dawn had and how many has Holly had? Exactly.
Funny how Dawn stacking her team with talent and taking them to a NC is "luck", but Holly stacking her team with talent and taking them to the 2nd round is the players' fault.
Coaching but AMB wont admit that.
How come everyone is saying not to count on our FRESHMEN but Dawn will have success and no problem with her freshmen taking two starting positions over and winning again?
Their #24 and 47 and 54 is better than our #2---#9...#12????
Yes, "luck" is how Dawn turned a traditional SEC bottom feeder into a national champion while Holly turned a traditional champion into unranked mediocrity.
Your argument is absolutely absurd....
Coaching but AMB wont admit that.
I think Dawn has had better luck than Holly. Holly would've had her final four had it not been for injuries. The injuries go all the way back to the year with Taber Spani. Dawn is offensively challenged, she was lucky getting two very talented guards that could thrive despite a real offensive scheme, in fact that only really happened after Coates was injured (more space to create). Holly didnt have the guards Dawn had but offensively UT looked better. Dawn had a easier route to the final 4 (luck). Not having to face UCONN (luck). However, coaching wise i think theyre pretty much the same.
If you were a parent of an athlete that is a marginal division one player at best, you would advise your child to switches Universities and hope for what...free education some where else? You are a knuckle head at best!Loyalty to a fault. If I were a parent of Nia Moore, Kortney Dunbar or Kamera Harris I would had told them to transfer from Tennessee because of Holly being a terrible coach.
So I don't see anything wrong with players transferring their 1st year. Why wait around. Leave immediately if possible.