- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 92,914
- Likes
- 63,348
Originally posted by milohimself@Apr 18, 2005 11:40 PM
Like I said, I'm not too familiar with that season. But I have also heard it on here that Woodson was the up-and-comer contender for the Heisman whereas Peyton was the shoe-in. What's more sensational than that?
My only arguement is that ESPN has no particular bias against UT, nor towards any school. Only towards what will garner ratings.
Woodson was not an up-and-comer, he was an invention of someone at ESPN to put some spice into the Heisman race and it backfired. Peyton was so much better than anyone else they thought it would be boring. I believe there were other factors but ESPN really screwed to pooch on that idea. It was going to be hard enough for another white, southern QB to win back-to-back awards anyway (see Wuerffel in '96). Peyton had one of the best seasons ever for a college QB. The loss @ UF was the only way anyone could justify not giving him the award, but lots of people have won it with a loss.
Milo, I'm not knocking your opinion because we all are entitled, but that award will never mean anything anymore to many UT fans. And since ESPN is the one who brought Woodson up, they are seen as the bad guy in the middle. I am a 3rd gen. UT alum and I bleed orange. There was no better player/person I would want to represent UT than Peyton. Him not winning was a slap in the face to all Big Orange fans. It's an old scar best not re-opened.