Arian Foster Scandal

#102
#102
Volunteer_Kirby said:
As much as I love Foster, the dude is a little crazy. But this girl might even be a different level of crazy. I wouldn't doubt one bit if she heard where the boys were staying in town and decided to do some "Hotel Lounge" shopping. . .just sayin...you can spot a gold digger a mile away.
Click to expand...

One of my good friends is a player for the Titans. I've heard him tell me many times about how several of these women get together and stake out these hotels. It's like an event with them. They are pros at it. Arian is still in the wrong, but I wouldn't doubt one bit she knew exactly who he was and went after him full throttle.
 
#103
#103
Volunteer_Kirby said:
A party. Giggidy.
Click to expand...

I understand your flippancy and use of the Family sex maniac character's favorite utterance. But some of us don't consider a spouse's life insignificant or something to play with. Don't get upset, I just happen to be a person who takes the sanctity of marriage very seriously. And truly believe when you venture outside it knowing about the very real HIV dangers, you're engaging in a premeditated effort at murder. But ignore me, it's just how I look at it and of course you know that I'm so set in my way on this nothing said will change it. So best just ignore me on this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#107
#107
YorkVol said:
Only AA athletes? No one else gets strange women preggers?
Click to expand...

forget it, man, armchair is one of those flour azzed jacks who can't see or concede that stupidity respects no race. The French Prez facing the poking scandal right now must be AFA. That South Carolina politician, Mark Sanford that went off to Brazil to do poker diplomacy must be AFA. John Ensign, David Vitter, Larry Craig, Jimmy Swaggart, Bill Clinton, Barney Frank and so on, all such dudes must be AFA, no matter how pasty they really are. That kind of dude just sits back and wait for an opportunity to throw such ignorant barbs out. Then when called out claim it was juts a joke. Stupidity respects no race, economic strata, religious affiliation, or nationality.
 
#108
#108
So people with diabetes also have AIDS?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#109
#109
butchna said:
So people with diabetes also have AIDS?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...


Following me from thread to thread, butchna? That's a bit low isn't it? Now since you have diabetes, my suggestion is see your doctor. I myself lack a medical degree so can't help you.
 
#110
#110
WoodsmanVol said:
I assume you know deadly HIV is. I assume you know when you go outside your marriage and poke without protection, you know you're risking HIV. I assume you know when you come home and poke your wife, also without protection, you're putting her life at risk. i assume you know that knowingly and willingly behaving this way isn't a "mistake" or "accident." And If she contracts AIDS, what do you call that?
Click to expand...

Where did HIV come from in the story? There never was a heterosexual HIV epidemic. Maybe worry about some crabs or the clap.
 
#112
#112
Special Ed said:
Even Arian is smart enough to know that an abortion costs much less than 18 years of child support.
Click to expand...

He is toast on both sides with the probability of losing his current family. Alimony and child support on that side too. This could end up being a very expensive taco.
 
#113
#113
#114
#114
TIL having an extramarital affair gives you Aids (and possibly diabetes). The internet is very educational
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#117
#117
WoodsmanVol said:
Not meant to be insulting, however, your ignorance shows plainly. Heterosexuals certainly can and do get HIV. And there is concern about an epidemic.

HIV Infection Among Heterosexuals at Increased Risk — United States, 2010
Heterosexuals and HIV
AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts: Heterosexuals and HIV
Click to expand...

Some AIDS math
Consider a nice guy Paul and his swinging single brother Stevie.

Paul gets married. He picks a wife from a population with probability p of being HIV-positive. They have sex three times a week (transmission probability r, about 1/1000).

Pauls probability per year of being infected: 150 p r . (For the mathematical reader: it is really 1-(1-pr)^150, which is approximately 150pr because 150r is much less than 1.)

Over to Stevie. He dates quite a bit, drawing partners from the same population as his brother's wife, so they are HIV-positive with probability p too. The typical unattached but sexually active heterosexual man has sex about once a month (Myth, p 61), but let's say Stevie is a stud, and gets lucky every weekend.

Stevie's probability per year of being infected: 50 p r (as before, the exact formula is 1-(1-pr)^50, which is approximately 50pr).

The point: if you don't know your partner's HIV status, you are at the same risk from them as if you would be if they were a different person each time you have sex. Paul does have one advantage, though. He can eliminate his future risk if his wife takes an AIDS test.
 
#119
#119
thebjd said:
Some AIDS math
Consider a nice guy Paul and his swinging single brother Stevie.

Paul gets married. He picks a wife from a population with probability p of being HIV-positive. They have sex three times a week (transmission probability r, about 1/1000).

Pauls probability per year of being infected: 150 p r . (For the mathematical reader: it is really 1-(1-pr)^150, which is approximately 150pr because 150r is much less than 1.)

Over to Stevie. He dates quite a bit, drawing partners from the same population as his brother's wife, so they are HIV-positive with probability p too. The typical unattached but sexually active heterosexual man has sex about once a month (Myth, p 61), but let's say Stevie is a stud, and gets lucky every weekend.

Stevie's probability per year of being infected: 50 p r (as before, the exact formula is 1-(1-pr)^50, which is approximately 50pr).

The point: if you don't know your partner's HIV status, you are at the same risk from them as if you would be if they were a different person each time you have sex. Paul does have one advantage, though. He can eliminate his future risk if his wife takes an AIDS test.
Click to expand...

post-24030-mark-wahlberg-confused-speechl-K41O.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#121
#121
thebjd said:
Some AIDS math
Consider a nice guy Paul and his swinging single brother Stevie.

Paul gets married. He picks a wife from a population with probability p of being HIV-positive. They have sex three times a week (transmission probability r, about 1/1000).

Pauls probability per year of being infected: 150 p r . (For the mathematical reader: it is really 1-(1-pr)^150, which is approximately 150pr because 150r is much less than 1.)

Over to Stevie. He dates quite a bit, drawing partners from the same population as his brother's wife, so they are HIV-positive with probability p too. The typical unattached but sexually active heterosexual man has sex about once a month (Myth, p 61), but let's say Stevie is a stud, and gets lucky every weekend.

Stevie's probability per year of being infected: 50 p r (as before, the exact formula is 1-(1-pr)^50, which is approximately 50pr).

The point: if you don't know your partner's HIV status, you are at the same risk from them as if you would be if they were a different person each time you have sex. Paul does have one advantage, though. He can eliminate his future risk if his wife takes an AIDS test.
Click to expand...

OK. Everybody do the hokie pokie with whoever you wan, any time you want and don't worry about it.
:hi:
 
#122
#122
I like Foster as a RB. However, anyone that cheats on a spouse is a vile piece of dog $hit. ZERO character and morals.

Selfish narcissistic behavior that comes from upbringing. Yes Fostermom, that means you too.

He wasn't thinking about his wife or kids when he was banging this chick. Classless person with zero morals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#124
#124
LittleDTO said:
I like Foster as a RB. However, anyone that cheats on a spouse is a vile piece of dog $hit. ZERO character and morals.

Selfish narcissistic behavior that comes from upbringing. Yes Fostermom, that means you too.

He wasn't thinking about his wife or kids when he was banging this chick. Classless person with zero morals.
Click to expand...

I hope not, that would be nasty
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#125
#125
I have never liked the guy he has always been about Arian.
I remember one dude posted an autographed jersey from that OT UK win with the douche putting his stats on there as well as the 2 runs he had that were called back.
Funny he never mentioned throwing the fball across the f'in field almost cost his team the game.
Guy is a narcissist.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top