Arizona Election Audit

I don't know the particulars of the arrangement. I don't think it inevitable that a lab would cause a global pandemic simply because it's in China.
Just because it's in China no. The way that government works we should have been skeptical they would do things properly. And, to your point, we were playing a dangerous game. It's pretty simple IMO. We were helping to fund this research at this lab. They obviously didn't do things properly. So I have no problem with the rest of the world blaming us and China.
 
... but Republicans only want to audit states which Trump lost. This whole thing boils down to Trump flavored sour grapes.
Again, I would bet you that there were irregularities in other states as well.

The obvious reason that the focus is on the states that he "lost" is to prove or verify that he actually did win the election. The next step would be to scour other states to see how big his margin of victory was... :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNVOLNAVY
... but Republicans only want to audit states which Trump lost. This whole thing boils down to Trump flavored sour grapes.

Democrats can easily do audits in states where Biden lost. I wonder if they did, do you think Republicans would fighting so hard for those audits to be stopped?
 
Just because it's in China no. The way that government works we should have been skeptical they would do things properly. And, to your point, we were playing a dangerous game. It's pretty simple IMO. We were helping to fund this research at this lab. They obviously didn't do things properly. So I have no problem with the rest of the world blaming us and China.
Should there be a tangible price comes goes with the "blame"?
 
Democrats can easily do audits in states where Biden lost. I wonder if they did, do you think Republicans would fighting so hard for those audits to be stopped?
The premise of your question is absurd. It's a waste of time for either party to still be engaging in "audits" of an election, over 4 months after the winning candidate has taken office. Since the Democratic Party has not yet devolved into a cult, with its members kneeling at the alter of a defeated narcissist with a fragile ego, it would be pointless.

The dumbest aspect to all of this bull $hit is still this: Even if you concede Arizona to Trump... it doesn't change the outcome of the election. Hell, give him Georgia too! He still damn lost.

The 2000 Presidential Election was much closer. It really did come down to one county in one state and just 568 votes. With the fact that his opponent's brother was governor of that one state, Al Gore had a much better case for having been cheated than Trump currently has. And yet, not even Al Gore went this far in contesting defeat. As a matter of fact, Gore presided over the certification of his loss in the Senate. What Republicans are doing right now is unprecedented... and just plain stupid looking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54
I think people aren't used to this level of professionalism and not allowing leaks. It was said very early on that they weren't going to be allowing leaks and would have one report at the end. That's That's way it should always be done.
There are some rumblings about them coming up short 200,000 ballots but don't know if that is verifiable at this point.
Lol. "People aren't used to professionalism and not having leaks"

Very next sentence "Its been leaked they're 200,000 votes short"
 
Last edited:
The premise of your question is absurd. It's a waste of time for either party to still be engaging in "audits" of an election, over 4 months after the winning candidate has taken office. Since the Democratic Party has not yet devolved into a cult, with its members kneeling at the alter of a defeated narcissist with a fragile ego, it would be pointless.

The dumbest aspect to all of this bull $hit is still this: Even if you concede Arizona to Trump... it doesn't change the outcome of the election. Hell, give him Georgia too! He still damn lost.

The 2000 Presidential Election was much closer. It really did come down to one county in one state and just 568 votes. With the fact that his opponent's brother was governor of that one state, Al Gore had a much better case for having been cheated than Trump currently has. And yet, not even Al Gore went this far in contesting defeat. As a matter of fact, Gore presided over the certification of his loss in the Senate. What Republicans are doing right now is unprecedented... and just plain stupid looking.

Let’s take a poll.
 
Lol. "People aren't used to professionalism and not having leaks"

Very next sentence "Its been leaked they're 200,000 votes short"


Yeah that was somewhat of a contradictory statement. There has very little been leaked out however. Nothing like what we usually see.
 
Last edited:
Trump is not auditing any states. It is the people in Arizona who have demanded the audit. Also, the guy thats filed the lawsuit against Fulton county to recount the absentee ballots didn't even vote for Trump
What a crock. Donald Trump applied political pressure to Republicans in the Arizona state legislature to conduct their own audit (with 'Trump friendly' firms this time), and those eager-to-please pee-ons agreed to do it.

Two Questions:

1) Do you realize that even if Donald Trump had won the states of Arizona and Georgia, the electoral college vote count totals would look like this?:

Joe Biden (D) ............ 279 *
Donald Trump (R) .... 259

With only 270 electoral college votes needed to win... Joe Biden still would have won the election.

2) Do you realize that two post-inaugural forensic audits of the election machines and software used in Maricopa County for the 2020 Presidential General Election have already taken place (in February), with neither one uncovering any issues?

Per: www.Maricopa.gov/ForensicAudit ... from February 23, 2021:

"Maricopa County's election equipment and software passed all tests performed by two independent firms hired to conduct the forensic audits, according to reports by two federally certified Voting Systems Laboratories."

Those two firms, SLI Compliance and Pro V&V, are both experienced with the forensic auditing of election equipment and software, and they are highly reputable. Neither of which can be said for Doug Logan's joke of a firm, known comically and pathetically as "Cyber Ninjas".
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
Yeah I'm sure somebody like you has absolutely no respect for General Flynn. That says a lot about who you are as a person.
In addition to the "Q" nonsense, Flynn is also on board the "Trump will be reinstated as President" banana boat. Now, how in the hell is a sane person supposed to respect that crazy $hit?
 
What a crock. Donald Trump applied political pressure to Republicans in the Arizona state legislature to conduct their own audit (with 'Trump friendly' firms this time), and those eager-to-please pee-ons agreed to do it.

Two Questions:

1) Do you realize that even if Donald Trump had won the states of Arizona and Georgia, the electoral college vote count totals would look like this?:

Joe Biden (D) ............ 279 *
Donald Trump (R) .... 259

With only 270 electoral college votes needed to win... Joe Biden still would have won the election.

2) Do you realize that two post-inaugural forensic audits of the election machines and software used in Maricopa County for the 2020 Presidential General Election have already taken place (in February), with neither one uncovering any issues?

Per: www.Maricopa.gov/ForensicAudit ... from February 23, 2021:

"Maricopa County's election equipment and software passed all tests performed by two independent firms hired to conduct the forensic audits, according to reports by two federally certified Voting Systems Laboratories."

Those two firms, SLI Compliance and Pro V&V, are both experienced with the forensic auditing of election equipment and software, and they are highly reputable. Neither of which can be said for Doug Logan's joke of a firm, known comically and pathetically as "Cyber Ninjas".
There's no helping them. It's the same people who got all excited about the releasing of the Kraken. Only to be later informed that Powell said you had to be a moron to believe her. This didn't even phase them. They have no self respect.
 
In addition to the "Q" nonsense, Flynn is also on board the "Trump will be reinstated as President" banana boat. Now, how in the hell is a sane person supposed to respect that crazy $hit?

So if there was massive fraud and Trump actually won why would he not be reinstated?
 
So if there was massive fraud and Trump actually won why would he not be reinstated?
So I am going to entertain your craziness for a moment. There is only one way to remove a sitting POTUS in our constitution. And he is sitting once he's been certified by Congress. That's impeachment. So you would impeach Biden. But then it goes to Harris. There is no legal method ends with Trump in office.
 
The premise of your question is absurd. It's a waste of time for either party to still be engaging in "audits" of an election, over 4 months after the winning candidate has taken office. Since the Democratic Party has not yet devolved into a cult, with its members kneeling at the alter of a defeated narcissist with a fragile ego, it would be pointless.

The dumbest aspect to all of this bull $hit is still this: Even if you concede Arizona to Trump... it doesn't change the outcome of the election. Hell, give him Georgia too! He still damn lost.

The 2000 Presidential Election was much closer. It really did come down to one county in one state and just 568 votes. With the fact that his opponent's brother was governor of that one state, Al Gore had a much better case for having been cheated than Trump currently has. And yet, not even Al Gore went this far in contesting defeat. As a matter of fact, Gore presided over the certification of his loss in the Senate. What Republicans are doing right now is unprecedented... and just plain stupid looking.

Your incessant need to keep harping about it is what’s stupid looking. You encouraged a multi year investigation into Trump/Russia and didn’t blink an eye. Now like a typical liberal, you have a hard time with someone investigating something that might expose you and your aide for what they are. Liars and hypocrites. You exemplify a liberal perfectly.

So keep on harping about how stupid this is. It just makes you and those who complain look even dumber.
 
The premise of your question is absurd. It's a waste of time for either party to still be engaging in "audits" of an election, over 4 months after the winning candidate has taken office. Since the Democratic Party has not yet devolved into a cult, with its members kneeling at the alter of a defeated narcissist with a fragile ego, it would be pointless.

The dumbest aspect to all of this bull $hit is still this: Even if you concede Arizona to Trump... it doesn't change the outcome of the election. Hell, give him Georgia too! He still damn lost.

The 2000 Presidential Election was much closer. It really did come down to one county in one state and just 568 votes. With the fact that his opponent's brother was governor of that one state, Al Gore had a much better case for having been cheated than Trump currently has. And yet, not even Al Gore went this far in contesting defeat. As a matter of fact, Gore presided over the certification of his loss in the Senate. What Republicans are doing right now is unprecedented... and just plain stupid looking.
Apples and Oranges, in 2000 the issue was whether a paper ballot was properly mark to determine that vote. This year it’s about whether someone actually cast a ballot for a vote that was recorded
 
So if there was massive fraud and Trump actually won why would he not be reinstated?
There isn't a mechanism in the United States Constitution for any such "reinstatement" of a President.

The time to prove such fraud occurred doesn't last indefinitely; nor should it. The 2020 Trump Campaign's legal representation had until the electoral college met on December 14th. However, not only did Trump's legal team fail to prove that massive fraud had occurred... they didn't even allege it had occurred when appearing in court. They would only allege it had occurred when appearing on cable news opinion shows. Given that fact, there was never any reason for the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari to a Trump Campaign law suit. Nothing which they had alleged in court would have changed the outcome of the election, even if proven accurate.
 
Last edited:
So I am going to entertain your craziness for a moment. There is only one way to remove a sitting POTUS in our constitution. And he is sitting once he's been certified by Congress. That's impeachment. So you would impeach Biden. But then it goes to Harris. There is no legal method ends with Trump in office.

That’s some sickening banana republic third world thinking right there to retain an illegitimate leader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
That’s some sickening banana republic third world thinking right there to retain an illegitimate leader.
Well Harris would probably get the boot too. So it would be POTUS Pelosi. I am not saying that's ideal. But that's the way it's written up. Law is law. Good thing it doesn't matter. And the only thing banana republic is trump and those of his supporters who refuse to concede. I thought vadge hats were bad. You guys are worse then the vadge hat folks from 2016.
 

VN Store



Back
Top