Arizona Election Audit

Apples and Oranges, in 2000 the issue was whether a paper ballot was properly mark to determine that vote. This year it’s about whether someone actually cast a ballot for a vote that was recorded
No, it's not apples and oranges, because Donald Trump claimed in a January 6th speech in front of The White House that his Vice President, Mike Pence, had the unilateral authority to set aside electoral votes from states in which his legal representation had been filing law suits. With that as context, it is notable that then-Vice President Al Gore presided over the Senate certification of his own defeat on January 6, 2001.

Even further, Trump has publicly chastised Pence for "not having the courage to do the right thing" on January 6th, and refuse to count electoral votes from some electors, who had been lawfully chosen, just because of some frivolous pending litigation by the likes of nutjob Sidney Powell.
 
The premise of your question is absurd. It's a waste of time for either party to still be engaging in "audits" of an election, over 4 months after the winning candidate has taken office. Since the Democratic Party has not yet devolved into a cult, with its members kneeling at the alter of a defeated narcissist with a fragile ego, it would be pointless.

The dumbest aspect to all of this bull $hit is still this: Even if you concede Arizona to Trump... it doesn't change the outcome of the election. Hell, give him Georgia too! He still damn lost.

The 2000 Presidential Election was much closer. It really did come down to one county in one state and just 568 votes. With the fact that his opponent's brother was governor of that one state, Al Gore had a much better case for having been cheated than Trump currently has. And yet, not even Al Gore went this far in contesting defeat. As a matter of fact, Gore presided over the certification of his loss in the Senate. What Republicans are doing right now is unprecedented... and just plain stupid looking.

This may be the most naïve thing you've ever said. You had to be giggling or having an aneurysm when you typed that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassmaster_Vol
That’s some sickening banana republic third world thinking right there to retain an illegitimate leader.

Reality is a tough pill to swallow for some.

Trump is not auditing any states. It is the people in Arizona who have demanded the audit. Also, the guy thats filed the lawsuit against Fulton county to recount the absentee ballots didn't even vote for Trump

Trumpers are, pardon me. The "people" of Arizona are being embarrassed by the actions of a few elected politicians that are desperate to cling to power and see an avenue within their base by lathering them up with stolen election rhetoric.

Thanks for bringing up Georgia, a State whose Secretary of State was "asked" to "find" just enough votes to put Donny over finish line in first or risk being voted out. This after the Republican SoS stated there was no evidence at all of election fraud.
 
For me this is not about having Trump reinstalled as President (although that would be great if it happened😀).... It's about getting rid of voting machines and going back to paper ballots. You are a complete moron to say voting machines are safe after all of the videos and articles from both sides have proven it is a completely false statement to say our elections are secure.
 
For me this is not about having Trump reinstalled as President (although that would be great if it happened😀).... It's about getting rid of voting machines and going back to paper ballots. You are a complete moron to say voting machines are safe after all of the videos and articles from both sides have proven it is a completely false statement to say our elections are secure.

Yeah...paper ballots are "safe"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol423
I have never met anybody that can hack a paper ballot

Yes you have. Do you know what hack means? It means you have illegal access. You can hack a computer, a phone network, and even a ballot box, mail-in ballot, and so forth.

Semantics aside, the method isn't the problem, the fraud is the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1
The method is the problem. How can you defend using a system that can be hacked from another computer. It's much easier for fraud to occur using the machines and its an idiotic statement to say otherwise.
 
There isn't a mechanism in the United States Constitution for any such "reinstatement" of a President.

The time to prove such fraud occurred doesn't last indefinitely; nor should it. The 2020 Trump Campaign's legal representation had until the electoral college met on December 14th. However, not only did Trump's legal team fail to prove that massive fraud had occurred... they didn't even allege it had occurred when appearing in court. They would only allege it had occurred when appearing on cable news opinion shows. Given that fact, there was never any reason for the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari to a Trump Campaign law suit. Nothing which they had alleged in court would have changed the outcome of the election, even if proven accurate.
Will Trump be reinstated? Not by any direct tool, but if “systemic” - a world the lefty seem to embrace - fraud is proven, the guilty can be held accountable. Joe is too demented to have any part of this, Kamala, I don’t know, but the machine behind it needs to be exposed.
 
Will Trump be reinstated? Not by any direct tool, but if “systemic” - a world the lefty seem to embrace - fraud is proven, the guilty can be held accountable. Joe is too demented to have any part of this, Kamala, I don’t know, but the machine behind it needs to be exposed.

Something as simple as no creases in the MIB's would be something difficult to refute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1
The method is the problem. How can you defend using a system that can be hacked from another computer. It's much easier for fraud to occur using the machines and its an idiotic statement to say otherwise.

IDK that to be true, and I think you are just guessing at that.
 
For me this is not about having Trump reinstalled as President (although that would be great if it happened😀).... It's about getting rid of voting machines and going back to paper ballots. You are a complete moron to say voting machines are safe after all of the videos and articles from both sides have proven it is a completely false statement to say our elections are secure.
Election 2020: Setting the Record Straight - Arizona - Dominion Voting Systems

November 3, 2020: In Maricopa County, all votes were cast on Election Day using paper ballots. Counties must also retain the paper ballots for recounts and hand count audits, in accordance with law [R.S. § 16-602].
 
We need an audit to audit the audit that audited the audit that audited the previous audit that audited the audit that audited the audit of the first audit that audited the audit of the election results in which they found absolutely nothing.
Then why does Biden have hundreds of lawyers fighting this? Why is the DOJ getting involved? Maybe to cover up the cover up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Then how do elections in a Cuba and Venezuela always seem to favor the communists? Those are almost exclusively paper ballot elections.


I don't know about Cuba but Venezuela has been using voting machines for quite a few years now. (That might be your answer)
 
IDK that to be true, and I think you are just guessing at that.


I'll help you out here. I'm providing you links to just a few of many many instances where Democrats were bringing up the vulnerabilities of using Voting Machines

Here is an article from the New Yorl Times in 2018
The Crisis of Election Security (Published 2018)


Check out this video of lots of different Democrats saying voting machines are not secure


From CBS in 2018


CNN exposes grave threat of voting fraud



Democrat Auditor: Arizona Audit is First Real Audit Since Election

Hacking Democracy - The Feature Documentary, Official Website
 

VN Store



Back
Top