Arizona Election Audit

#4,477
#4,477
whodeycin85 said:
Really. In a court of law your are guilty or innocent...he was tried which is what Impeachment is...and was not convicted...
Click to expand...
As was just pointed out to you... a House Impeachment Hearing, followed by a Senate Impeachment Trial do not involve a court of law. They are more accurately described as being "political exercises", which involve individual political calculations being made by ambitious, career-minded politicians, than described as being actual legal proceedings.
 
Last edited:
#4,478
#4,478
tvolsfan said:
We are just going to stop at the first one for now. Show me evidence that the rest of the world is laughing at Biden. Because I can certainly show you examples of the world laughing at Trump.
Click to expand...

Oh come on man, you know the rest of the world is laughing at this fool. We know he's embarrassing. You didn't have to read Georgia fan jokes to know Butch and the turnover garage can was stupid af.

Your post reminds me of the difference in book sense and common sense. You're not alone. You had a get along group of likes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#4,479
#4,479
BreatheUT said:
Oh come on man, you know the rest of the world is laughing at this fool. We know he's embarrassing. You didn't have to read Georgia fan jokes to know Butch and the turnover garage can was stupid af.

Your post reminds me of the difference in book sense and common sense. You're not alone. You had a get along group of likes.
Click to expand...
Lol okay
 
#4,482
#4,482
BowlBrother85 said:
As was just pointed out to you... a House Impeachment Hearing, followed by a Senate Impeachment Trial do not involve a court of law. They are more accurately described as being "political exercises", which involve individual political calculations being made by ambitious, career-minded politicians.
Click to expand...
Impeachment is for the legislative body to bring forth charges of misconduct...in order for those charges to stick 2/3 of the body needs to convict...did they do that??? Yes or no...its simple..
 
#4,483
#4,483
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002, AM64 and BreatheUT
#4,484
#4,484
tvolsfan said:
Believe me, I am aware of how you see it.
Click to expand...

I'm not even referring to policy issues. As we get older many of us will struggle with something so that's not funny. What is a concern is we have that many voting people for a man that appears to be senile. If we see it and have many with their head in the sand then you know others see it that don't have a dog in the hunt.
 
#4,486
#4,486
tvolsfan said:
Sky News is a far right news channel. I’m assuming you didn’t know that.
Click to expand...

Who cares? Facts are facts.

Your argument is like saying we had enough talent on the field last year to compete for the championship because our opponents thrashed us as a shell of ourselves.
 
#4,488
#4,488
whodeycin85 said:
Impeachment is for the legislative body to bring forth charges of misconduct...in order for those charges to stick 2/3 of the body needs to convict...did they do that??? Yes or no...its simple..
Click to expand...
It's not that simple, because the votes which are made either for conviction or for acquittal, involve a political calculus, rather than just an examination of witness testimony and of the evidence presented during the trial, in conjunction with the legal arguments from the opposing counsels.
 
#4,489
#4,489
whodeycin85 said:
You asked for proof I submitted Biden being made fun of.....by other countries...he is a joke and everyone knows..
Click to expand...
Yes, I asked for proof he was being laughed at around the world. Not anti-democratic propaganda from far right commentators. Surely you see the difference.

I guess the clip of the gaffe is something.
 
#4,490
#4,490
Orangeburst said:
All anyone is looking for is "transparancy". And it is justfied. There is a huge stack of ballots. Should be eazy peazy
Click to expand...

No, people are looking for a different result. Ballots have been counted by hand. Now there are nitwits looking for bamboo in the paper and other assorted nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#4,492
#4,492
BowlBrother85 said:
The United Nation's General Assembly was definitely laughing at Donald Trump in September of 2018, after Trump repeated a frequent boast of his - that his administration had accomplished more in his first two years in office, than any other presidential administration in American history. Trump didn't always know how to address an audience, whenever he was speaking to something other than an adoring crowd of supporters. Trump's propensity to boast, led to some awkward moments, during those times.

There is also a video on YouTube of Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, mocking Donald Trump during a candid moment during the NATO anniversary celebration in London from December of 2019. Prime Minister Trudeau was speaking to a small gathering of world leaders, which included French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and the Prime Minister of The Netherlands, Mark Rutte, when Trudeau said this:

"He (obviously talking about Trump) was late because he takes a 40 minute press conference at the top," ... upon hearing this, Prime Minister Rutte can be heard scoffing, "He was in a hurry. I've seen it take longer than that to put make-up on him, and brush his hair."

Prime Minister Trudeau then says, "You just watch his team's jaws drop to the floor," while the other leaders look on with bemused expressions.

Sure, the power that the office of the President of the United States commands, is well-respected and taken very seriously by other world leaders... but clearly, Donald Trump as a person, was not. Trump is an even bigger joke abroad, than he is here.
Click to expand...

Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#4,494
#4,494
BowlBrother85 said:
It's not that simple, because the votes which are made either for conviction or for acquittal, involve a political calculus, rather than just an examination of witness testimony and of the evidence presented during the trial, in conjunction with the legal arguments from the opposing counsels.
Click to expand...
He was aquitted of the charges

This isn't a hard concept
Acquittal definition

  1. a judgment that a person is NOT GUILTY of the crime with which the person has been charged.


 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,496
#4,496
whodeycin85 said:
He was aquitted of the charges

This isn't a hard concept
Acquittal definition

  1. a judgment that a person is NOT GUILTY of the crime with which the person has been charged.
Click to expand...
* From within a proceeding which involved individual political calculations made by politicians who keep what they believe to be in the best interest of their careers at the forefront of their decisions on how to vote. The actual perceived guilt or innocence of the defendant is secondary during such a proceeding.

It's not a hard concept, but a Senate Impeachment Trial is slightly more complicated than how you are trying to present it.
 
#4,497
#4,497
ClearwaterVol said:
No, people are looking for a different result. Ballots have been counted by hand. Now there are nitwits looking for bamboo in the paper and other assorted nonsense.
Click to expand...
If they could prove the wrongness of the result with the ballots, they wouldn't be tossing out screenshots of computer gobbledygook to make their case.
 
#4,498
#4,498
BowlBrother85 said:
* From within a proceeding which involved individual political calculations made by politicians who keep what they believe to be in the best interest of their careers at the forefront of their decisions on how to vote. The actual perceived guilt or innocence of the defendant is secondary during such a proceeding.

It's not a hard concept, but a Senate Impeachment Trial is slightly more complicated than how you are trying to present it.
Click to expand...
You keep repeating it doesn't make it true.. even after the Dems had full control they still acquitted his last Impeachment... your continuous repeating was just proven wrong...because by your gibberish above...for political best interest. Would be to be on the side of those in charge yet...it didnt happen...
 
#4,500
#4,500
Velo Vol said:
If they could prove the wrongness of the result with the ballots, they wouldn't be tossing out screenshots of computer gobbledygook to make their case.
Click to expand...
They have shown ballots.....they we t so far as to show several paper ballots with identical markings..but several different id numbers
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top