Arizona Election Audit

Because the binary mindset is an overused trope designed to limit thought and force a specific perspective.
BB can’t get as far as binary. One Rep senator stated his opinion is Trump was guilty so there in BB’s mind Trump was guilty. It’s hilarious that he says Reps saying Trump was not guilty are just doing so due to being a political exercise but he doesn’t even acknowledge that the accusations and process from the Dems was the same. There was never enough of anything to go through that sham of a process once, let alone twice. Had that been anyone else in the same scenario it wouldn’t have happened. Pelosi herself didn’t want to do it but did a 180 and it wasn’t because of evidence. Of course I’m sure she said it was and BB believes that with no hesitation because it fits his belief.
 
Oh come on man, you know the rest of the world is laughing at this fool. We know he's embarrassing. You didn't have to read Georgia fan jokes to know Butch and the turnover garage can was stupid af.

Your post reminds me of the difference in book sense and common sense. You're not alone. You had a get along group of likes.
We already know it. Putin mocked Biden to the world by challenging him to a live debate. It was a little more direct than some comment about holding a press conference.
 
If you don't understand how a House Impeachment hearing and vote, followed by a Senate trial and vote, are political exercises, rather than being purely legal proceedings, then you are a moron.

The reason that Trump was impeached twice is because Democrats held a majority in the House of Representatives both times. The reason that Trump was acquitted twice is because it takes a two-thirds majority (67 votes) in the Senate to convict, which Democrats obviously didn't have.
And the impeachments had zilch to do with the actions of Trump and both were all about the fact that it was Trump that did them.
 
Why is the only source for this essentially YouTube videos?

Never mind. Reputable sources have debunked this garbage. Fact check: Dominion Voting Systems foreign investment claim is false

(Edit) So apparently Epoch Times Times did this segment 7 months ago. This is probably where all of this started from.. Not a lot of information can be found on Luo Qiang, Ye Xiang and Mu Lina. I have seen a few things alleging that their names have been scrubbed from the internet. Who knows what is true at this point.



There clearly appears to be a connection.
UBS Securities LLC invested $400 million into Staple Street Capital on Oct. 8, 2020. There are two UBS Securities; one in New York (LLC) & one in Beijing (Co. Ltd.). The three board members of UBS NY are; Luo Qiang, Ye Xiang, & Mu Lina.

Luo Qiang was also on the board at UBS Beijing. Ye Xiang was the Board Chairman at UBS Beijing, a former Executive Director at Bank of China International, & a Secretary at the People's Bank of China. Mu Lina was a Director at UBS Beijing.

Mu Lina was a board member of Chongqing Three Gorges & SureKAM Corporation. SureKAM is a "Mini-Huawei" led by a former Huawei employee. UBS Beijing was established under personal supervision of the Vice President of China, Wang Qishan.
 
Last edited:
And the impeachments had zilch to do with the actions of Trump and both were all about the fact that it was Trump that did them.
That is blatantly wrong. Both impeachments concerned misconduct on the part of then-President Donald Trump.

(1) President Donald Trump should not have withheld Congressionally-authorized military aid to the Ukraine, in order to leverage the aid against their president's willingness to perform a campaign favor for him. That justified the first impeachment.

(2) President Donald Trump should not have lied to a crowd of his supporters on January 6th, by telling them that his Vice President, Mike Pence, had the power to cast aside votes from electors, who were from states which President Trump claimed to have held rigged elections. Mike Pence's role on January 6th, was nothing more than a procedural formality. That reality was brought to Trump's attention multiple times, and yet, he continued to repeat this lie. His lie was a factor in the ensuing riot, if not a direct incitement of it. That justified the 2nd impeachment.

I will also put this out there:

It has recently come to light, that on December 28th, then-President Donald Trump attempted to enlist the assistance of the acting Attorney General, Jeffrey Rosen, in his efforts to overturn the outcome of his own Presidential Election in the state of Georgia. Out of all the abuses of power, which Donald Trump engaged in as the President of the United States, this was the most egregious and potentially harmful to the country.

This flagrant abuse of the power of his office can not be allowed to stand as an established precedent for acceptable Presidential behavior, after losing a re-election bid, or it will imperil the democratic system of elections in the United States. There is no way in hell that Republicans would approve of Joe Biden asking Merrick Garland to do the same thing in December of 2024, if Biden loses his re-election.
 
Last edited:
There clearly appears to be a connection.
UBS Securities LLC invested $400 million into Staple Street Capital on Oct. 8, 2020. There are two UBS Securities; one in New York (LLC) & one in Beijing (Co. Ltd.). The three board members of UBS NY are; Luo Qiang, Ye Xiang, & Mu Lina.

Luo Qiang was also on the board at UBS Beijing. Ye Xiang was the Board Chairman at UBS Beijing, a former Executive Director at Bank of China International, & a Secretary at the People's Bank of China. Mu Lina was a Director at UBS Beijing.

Mu Lina was a board member of Chongqing Three Gorges & SureKAM Corporation. SureKAM is a "Mini-Huawei" led by a former Huawei employee. UBS Beijing was established under personal supervision of the Vice President of China, Wang Qishan.

More lies...

Board of Directors

Do you never get tired of believing the bullsh!t? You're sure there was election fraud when everything you believe in is demonstrably false?

BTW, it is UBS NY that owns 51% of UBS Bejing not the other way around.
 
There clearly appears to be a connection.
UBS Securities LLC invested $400 million into Staple Street Capital on Oct. 8, 2020. There are two UBS Securities; one in New York (LLC) & one in Beijing (Co. Ltd.). The three board members of UBS NY are; Luo Qiang, Ye Xiang, & Mu Lina.

Luo Qiang was also on the board at UBS Beijing. Ye Xiang was the Board Chairman at UBS Beijing, a former Executive Director at Bank of China International, & a Secretary at the People's Bank of China. Mu Lina was a Director at UBS Beijing.

Mu Lina was a board member of Chongqing Three Gorges & SureKAM Corporation. SureKAM is a "Mini-Huawei" led by a former Huawei employee. UBS Beijing was established under personal supervision of the Vice President of China, Wang Qishan.
Everything you posted after, "There clearly appears to be a connection," is a lie.

You post lie after lie from the lunatic fringe of the extreme right-wing. There is never any shame when you are called out for it, or any adjustments ever made when deciding what sources to link. You just keep on posting junk from the same discredited sites.
 
That is blatantly wrong. Both impeachments concerned misconduct on the part of then-President Donald Trump.

(1) President Donald Trump should not have withheld Congressionally-authorized military aid to the Ukraine, in order to leverage the aid against their president's willingness to perform a campaign favor for him. That justified the first impeachment.

(2) President Donald Trump should not have lied to a crowd of his supporters on January 6th, by telling them that his Vice President, Mike Pence, had the power to cast aside votes from electors, who were from states which President Trump claimed to have held rigged elections. Mike Pence's role on January 6th, was nothing more than a procedural formality. That reality was brought to Trump's attention multiple times, and yet, he continued to repeat this lie. His lie was a factor in the ensuing riot, if not a direct incitement of it. That justified the 2nd impeachment.

I will also put this out there:

It has recently come to light, that on December 28th, then-President Donald Trump attempted to enlist the assistance of the acting Attorney General, Jeffrey Rosen, in his efforts to overturn the outcome of his own Presidential Election in the state of Georgia. Out of all the abuses of power, which Donald Trump engaged in as the President of the United States, this was the most egregious and potentially harmful to the country.

This flagrant abuse of the power of his office can not be allowed to stand as an established precedent for acceptable Presidential behavior, after losing a re-election bid, or it will imperil the democratic system of elections in the United States. There is no way in hell that Republicans would approve of Joe Biden asking Merrick Garland to do the same thing in December of 2024, if Biden loses his re-election.
Of course Reps wouldn’t approve. People on each side just screech at the things the others do while doing the same things or something similar themselves. I’m not getting into the details on each as you see those things your way and I see them mine. If any other Rep POTUS in history did those exact same things they wouldn’t have been impeached. You said yourself it is a political exercise and that’s all it was, a chance to drag Trump through the mud. Dems knew there was zero chance of conviction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Everything you posted after, "There clearly appears to be a connection," is a lie.

You post lie after lie from the lunatic fringe of the extreme right-wing. There is never any shame when you are called out for it, or any adjustments ever made when deciding what sources to link. You just keep on posting junk from the same discredited sites.

And now that this has been pointed out for the umpteenth time, he'll do exactly what he's done each and every time before - find a way to duck any modicum of intellectual honesty and reconcile that he's right and ultimately ignore reality. Rinse and repeat.

Nothing will change his mind that there wasn't fraud, no way he could be wrong at this point - too much has been invested. As evidenced by watching his assertions get toppled, he simply falls back to some nonsensical bastion of "Y r U SCar3d of An aUdit?" or other non sequitur to whatever twitter lie he's glommed on to that day. These Q2.0 boys can't be reasoned with because their beliefs are irrational.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54
More lies...

Board of Directors

Do you never get tired of believing the bullsh!t? You're sure there was election fraud when everything you believe in is demonstrably false?

BTW, it is UBS NY that owns 51% of UBS Bejing not the other way around.

I am in meetings all morning. When I get some free time I will do a little more research on where this information came from. If what I posted was a lie I will gladly apologize and I will never use him as a news source again. I never intend to mislead with any of my posts and I realize that there is a lot of misinformation out there on both sides.
 
And now that this has been pointed out for the umpteenth time, he'll do exactly what he's done each and every time before - find a way to duck any modicum of intellectual honesty and reconcile that he's right and ultimately ignore reality. Rinse and repeat.

Nothing will change his mind that there wasn't fraud, no way he could be wrong at this point - too much has been invested. As evidenced by watching his assertions get toppled, he simply falls back to some nonsensical bastion of "Y r U SCar3d of An aUdit?" or other non sequitur to whatever twitter lie he's glommed on to that day. These Q2.0 boys can't be reasoned with because their beliefs are irrational.


I don't duck anything. I also don't have time to invest in back and forth arguing with people who I know I will never change their viewpoints. If what I posted is false I will gladly acknowledge it. On the flips side of this how many times over the past 4 years has mainstream media published lie after lie without getting called out. If they would actually do their job and just report the news without bias maybe we wouldn't have to rely on citizen reporting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
I don't duck anything. I also don't have time to invest in back and forth arguing with people who I know I will never change their viewpoints. If what I posted is false I will gladly acknowledge it. On the flips side of this how many times over the past 4 years has mainstream media published lie after lie without getting called out. If they would actually do their job and just report the news without bias maybe we wouldn't have to rely on citizen reporting.



Rando twitter users with clear agendas is now "citizen reporting?"

LOL, you can pour sugar on a turd - but no ones going to take a bite.

Time and time again the prognostications fall flat, because there's no there, there.



And the dominoes keep falling...

MyPillow Guy’s ‘Cyber Expert’ Admits They Have No Proof of Election Hack

My Pillow guy is falling on his face, it's a good thing he's not being sued for defaming Dominion, oh wait.

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell fled the stage at his cyber symposium at the same time news broke that Dominion's billion-dollar defamation lawsuit against him would proceed
 
If any other Rep POTUS in history did those exact same things they wouldn’t have been impeached.
I don't believe that's true, because there was a Republican president, Richard Nixon, who similarly abused the power of his office. Richard Nixon tried to enlist the aid of an apolitical law enforcement agency (the FBI), that falls under the purview of the federal government, in his efforts to cover up the break-in at the Democratic Party headquarters inside of the Watergate Hotel, and to also quell the ensuing investigation. Richard Nixon was not only assured of being impeached, he would have also been removed from office. Nixon chose to resign first.

People on each side just screech at the things the others do while doing the same things or something similar themselves.
You can't point to a Democratic Party President who tried to use the Attorney General (an apolitical position) to help him overturn his own Presidential Election defeat.

In late December, an official with the Department of Justice, named Jeffrey Clark, sent a letter to the acting Attorney General, Jeffrey Rosen, at the behest of President Donald Trump which outlined Trump's strategy for retaining the presidency. This purported strategy involved Attorney General Rosen publicly announcing (without presenting any evidence) that the 2020 Presidential Election "was corrupt". Per Jeffrey Rosen, Trump's exact words were, "Just say the election was corrupt [and] leave the rest to me."

The only reason this strategy wasn't successful, can be attributed to the sound ethics of then-Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen. He refused to take part in it, while other Senior DOJ officials (such as Richard Donoghue) threatened to resign if Trump replaced Rosen with Clark. So, Trump decided to ditch this strategy.

This episode was an unprecedented abuse of power by former President Donald Trump.
 
Last edited:
I don't believe that's true, because there was a Republican president, Richard Nixon, who similarly abused the power of his office. Richard Nixon tried to enlist the aid of an apolitical law enforcement agency (the FBI), that falls under the purview of the federal government, in his efforts to cover up the break-in at the Democratic Party headquarters inside of the Watergate Hotel, and to also quell the ensuing investigation. Richard Nixon was not only assured of being impeached, he would have also been removed from office.


You can't point to a Democratic Party President who tried to use the Attorney General (an apolitical position) to help him overturn his own Presidential Election defeat.

In late December, an official with the Department of Justice, named Jeffrey Clark, sent a letter to the acting Attorney General, Jeffrey Rosen, at the behest of President Donald Trump which outlined Trump's strategy for retaining the presidency. This purported strategy involved Attorney General Rosen publicly announcing (without presenting any evidence) that the 2020 Presidential Election "was corrupt". Per Jeffrey Rosen, Trump's exact words were, "Just say the election was corrupt [and] leave the rest to me."

The only reason this strategy wasn't successful, can be attributed to the sound ethics of then-Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen. He refused to take part in it.

This episode was an unprecedented abuse of power by former President Donald Trump.

Nixon was impeached and a R Senate was going to convict and remove.


That letter should be easily found and presented as evidence since it is public record.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
Charges lead to impeachment. He was found guilty of the charges, therefore he was impeached.

The impeachment lead to conviction. He was not convicted, therefore he did not vacate his office.

He was charged, impeached, but not convicted.
Uh, no. Impeachment is the charging process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
I don't believe that's true, because there was a Republican president, Richard Nixon, who similarly abused the power of his office. Richard Nixon tried to enlist the aid of an apolitical law enforcement agency (the FBI), that falls under the purview of the federal government, in his efforts to cover up the break-in at the Democratic Party headquarters inside of the Watergate Hotel, and to also quell the ensuing investigation. Richard Nixon was not only assured of being impeached, he would have also been removed from office. Nixon chose to resign first.


You can't point to a Democratic Party President who tried to use the Attorney General (an apolitical position) to help him overturn his own Presidential Election defeat.

In late December, an official with the Department of Justice, named Jeffrey Clark, sent a letter to the acting Attorney General, Jeffrey Rosen, at the behest of President Donald Trump which outlined Trump's strategy for retaining the presidency. This purported strategy involved Attorney General Rosen publicly announcing (without presenting any evidence) that the 2020 Presidential Election "was corrupt". Per Jeffrey Rosen, Trump's exact words were, "Just say the election was corrupt [and] leave the rest to me."

The only reason this strategy wasn't successful, can be attributed to the sound ethics of then-Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen. He refused to take part in it, while other Senior DOJ officials (such as Richard Donoghue) threatened to resign if Trump replaced Rosen with Clark. So, Trump decided to ditch this strategy.

This episode was an unprecedented abuse of power by former President Donald Trump.
Here’s the deal man. Now you’re just hanging on the last nugget you’ve gotten from MSM. As hogg said, where’s the letter? You were screeching this same nonsense before you ever knew about this latest thing too so it’s funny that you just keep pivoting to whatever crap you’re fed. Produce the letter so it can be read as we already know you and others like to insert your own assumptions of what someone was thinking rather than going by what they said and did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
Here’s the deal man. Now you’re just hanging on the last nugget you’ve gotten from MSM. As hogg said, where’s the letter? You were screeching this same nonsense before you ever knew about this latest thing too so it’s funny that you just keep pivoting to whatever crap you’re fed. Produce the letter so it can be read as we already know you and others like to insert your own assumptions of what someone was thinking rather than going by what they said and did.

His last thread of glory to try to explain away voting for the worst candidate in history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002

VN Store



Back
Top