whodeycin85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 9,445
- Likes
- 10,300
If you don't understand how a House Impeachment hearing and vote, followed by a Senate trial and vote, are political exercises, rather than being purely legal proceedings, then you are a moron.You keep repeating it doesn't make it true.. even after the Dems had full control they still acquitted his last Impeachment... your continuous repeating was just proven wrong...because by your gibberish above...for political best interest. Would be to be on the side of those in charge yet...it didnt happen...
Oh i get it....its a show 1st...and the ones trying Impeachment tend to throw unvalidated **** hoping it sticks...if the preceedings held facts...for example had trump said storm the capital and take the white house..guarantee no matter what side they lineup on. He would have been convicted. But he wasn'tIf you don't understand how a House Impeachment hearing and vote, followed by a Senate trial are political exercises, rather than being purely legal proceedings, then you are a moron.
The reason that Trump was impeached twice is because Democrats held a majority in the House of Representatives both times. The reason that Trump was acquitted twice is because it takes a two-thirds majority (67 votes) in the Senate to convict, which Democrats obviously didn't have.
I have been charged which is what Impeachment is, but never found guilty.....which means there wasn't enough evidence to convict..which makes the charges mean nothing...
You need to read the definition of ImpeachmentCharges lead to impeachment. He was found guilty of the charges, therefore he was impeached.
The impeachment lead to conviction. He was not convicted, therefore he did not vacate his office.
He was charged, impeached, but not convicted.
Charges lead to impeachment. He was found guilty of the charges, therefore he was impeached.
The impeachment lead to conviction. He was not convicted, therefore he did not vacate his office.
He was charged, impeached, but not convicted.
Yes... but an impeachment vote in the House of Representatives involves political considerations which a grand jury (hopefully!) wouldn't be making prior to an indictment. You don't seem to understand that an impeachment is not a legal proceeding. Not only for why votes are cast the way they are, but also concerning the consequences of conviction.You need to read the definition of Impeachment
Impeachment is the act of charging the person..
Definition of IMPEACH
Might wanna contact them and say they are wrong..
It is because criminal charges and removal of office if convicted...if you whole premise is that it hold no value other then a political show..I agree...hell even Clinton was aquittedYes... but an impeachment vote in the House of Representatives involves political considerations which a grand jury (hopefully!) wouldn't be making prior to an indictment. You don't seem to understand that an impeachment is not a legal proceeding. Not only for why votes are cast the way they are, but also concerning the consequences of conviction.
Charges lead to impeachment. He was found guilty of the charges, therefore he was impeached.
The impeachment lead to conviction. He was not convicted, therefore he did not vacate his office.
He was charged, impeached, but not convicted.
Far Left Wisconsin Governor Tells Counties to Ignore Subpoenas for House Audits
What do they have to hide?
https://home.frankspeech.com/tv/video/help-save-our-country-share-everywhere
Can anyone explain to me why Chinese companies invested $400 million into Staple Street Capital (the owner of Dominion voting)?