There is no reason for anyone here to believe a word of this. You are not an expert on anything but delusions of grandeur. This ridiculous post of yours doesn't make you anything but a liar.
Ah, the mighty keyboard warrior, slinging barbs of stupidity while safely ensconced in an impregnable tower of ignorance. You are clearly not the sort who can discern the difference between posting of truth carefully parsed and the aggrandized rantings of trolls so I will not waste effort in trying to disabuse you of your errant prejudicial opinions. No value in wrestling with the pig and its bacon not worth taking.
As to your other comment regarding fraud, I place this here to inform those who may yet desire a free and educated discussion of ideas:
1. AG Barr's statement was perhaps true as of 3 weeks after the election. I have my strong suspicions, however, as to how much investigating he (or his staff, the same staff largely that tried to help engineer a virtual coup on President Trump with the FBI and intelligence agencies) actually did. That said, like most criminal investigations, especially of fraud or cybercrime, it takes many months to put together a solid case, even when you know something happened (because you have to prove it in court)
2. In my experience, cheating happens every election across multiple levels but what made this one different is the scale. One could say they were better prepared than when they were surprised in 2016 but I think it was simply the pandemic which enabled them to change the laws toward (no ID) mail in ballots, sending them out unrequested, then "bundling" them, which allowed operatives to show up at election HQ with stacks of completed ballots. That completes the process circle - a. how to get a live ballot, b. fill it out as you like (or copy if you are in a rush) and c. how to get it back into the system undetected or with a knowing wink. This process allowed the big city Dem machines in swing states to put in enough fraudulent votes to cover the statewide races.
3. I have not seen "proof" because various evidence has really not gone to court. There was a rush to throw things in closer to the election but most of those did not have the time to pull everything together. As it stands currently, in analogous CSI parlance, we "know" their was substantial fraud because we can see the outline of the body as we examine the crime scene. We see the blood spatter and can ascertain from the amount of blood and its directionality that wounds to the victim (democratic elections) likely proved fatal. All these can be determined from the aggregate data which is published by the Feds. What we do not yet have is the body so as to examine the method of murder - and it is likely that there were many attacks so was it the stab to the liver, the pipe bashing the head, etc that caused the fatal damage (but they all contributed to the outcome). To get this, we need audit results to examine the ballots and the machines (including internal software). So far, except for AZ, I am unaware of any efforts in this direction.
4. So far I have not seen anything definitive that the software is intentionally corrupted but there are a number of concerning questions that need to be investigated with full access to the machines. The pattern in results however (barely losing statewide races in red/swing states but massive GOP gains to congressional seats), leans toward cheating by "stuffin the ballots" rather than wholesale programming of the machines or presumably they would have cut back on the congressional wins. Besides, there are several ways that election insiders can use features in the software to their benefit to cheat without the machine maker being in on it in any way. Two main concepts here tho - 1. there should not be any HARDWARE capability of the machines to network. It violates election law in most states for there to be ANY wireless connection, WAN, internet or otherwise. 2. Once the software and bios have been installed, tested and certified, there is absolutely NO reason for an "update". The only thing would be to load the ballot config but that does not in any way change the operating software or the OS.
5. None of this has anything to do with Trump really - not anymore. That stopped, as intended, when Biden was sworn in. Why the forensic investigation of this MUST be done, however, is so that people can trust that the elections are held fairly, even if they do not like the final result and even if sometimes the people are incompetent's. If, as the GOPers allege, the elections were held unfairly, it not only stole the presidency from them but probably 4 senate seats (GA 2, AZ, MI). More damaging even than that single cycle loss, however, is the simple fact that if they do not fix the holes the rats made, Republicans will not win another presidential or statewide tossup race for the foreseeable future. It is also why I think all this talk of the Newsom recall is premature - "it matters not who does the voting, as long as I do the counting", says the party hack.
6. This was not engineered by some vast conspiracy of your local dem voting machine clerk, who is making minimum wage but happy for the gov benefits. The team who would have done this are likely no more than 20-30 serious operatives like I used to be who really knew what was happening. Most everyone else would be simply unquestioning soldiers who value their county machine appointed job and would probably just be following orders from the chief clerk or deputy without knowing really what it was all about. That chief is getting the orders to follow from a consultant whom the local machine has been told to listen to. That is how it works.
All I can say is that it was considerably harder to cheat when we had the lever machines. Still possible of course, bussing people to pollsites, etc. But I remember when we had made the transition to the new ballot readers but still had all the old machines from all counties in a single, absolutely enormous warehouse (in case we needed for backup), the one we used to sequester them after Hillary's primary. It was an amazing site really. Hot too, dang warehouses in the summer. When the new machines came, they had to spend more on air conditioning because the imaging drums were melting (plus I was having union troubles threatening works stoppage)
