Arizona Election Audit

#1,477
#1,477
BowlBrother85 said:
That isn't what I said at all. Someone like Doug Logan, who has made a conclusive determination of the outcome, before the audit even began should not be a part of the audit. Nor should someone who has a clear conflict of interest with an attorney for one of the campaigns (and Logan has posted provably false claims about Dominion on Sidney Powell's website, which she is now being sued for) be a part of the audit. Finally, someone with zero experience in auditing elections, should not be a part of an audit which involves the Presidential Election.

I can't believe how many of you are defending and justifying the hiring of Cyber Ninjas. It is embarrassing to read. This is so stupid. They should not have been hired. Period.
Click to expand...
Why are you reading your own posts? They’re bad but I probably wouldn’t called them embarrassing but you do you BB. You do realize I didn’t say anything about Cyber Ninjas right? Never mind, I get calling it embarrassing now. Carry on.
 
#1,478
#1,478
Tastylicks said:
do you have a point? this is boring
Click to expand...
The fact you don’t see where this is going is hilarious and not boring at all. This is quite entertaining. It’s like watching a mother bird try to nudge a fledgling out of the nest to take that first flight. Of course we know how this will end for you baby bird but I’ll still watch it happen.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#1,480
#1,480
luthervol said:
The repubs could have done the same in 2016, they just didn't seem overly concerned. Now had Hillary won, you can bet your ass we would have seen the same thing then we are seeing now.
Click to expand...
And what would be happening had Trump won 2020?
 
#1,487
#1,487
VolinWayne said:
How is this Q level nonsense? You don't even make sense sometimes with your rants. Grow up already
Click to expand...

Rant?

LOL

Twitter pictures with random objects circled with captions of far fetched claims are how you and the Qanon freakshows convinced yourselves of absolute BS for four years.

My posts aren't that high brow, if you're not following them - ask someone over the age of eight to explain it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#1,489
#1,489
hUTch2002 said:
And what would be happening had Trump won 2020?
Click to expand...

Going out on a limb here but... there probably wouldn't be this push by State legislators to reform election laws or a need to audit the audit that was audited.

But whatever, they can keep looking - keeping the narrative alive with the simpletons who don't have the intellectual capacity to reconcile that a dummy like Trump was rejected.
 
#1,490
#1,490
Septic said:
Rant?

LOL

Twitter pictures with random objects circled with captions of far fetched claims are how you and the Qanon freakshows convinced yourselves of absolute BS for four years.

My posts aren't that high brow, if you're not following them - ask someone over the age of eight to explain it.
Click to expand...


IMG_20210508_095553_156.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#1,493
#1,493

If I understand the hardware correctly, a router would include only a log of connections between machine addresses and not the communication transmitted during the connection. So unless a sheriff's department is doing something nefarious, why exactly would their interconnections be a security matter unless they were to confidential sources? If they are legitimate security issues, then why are they not on a separate router to begin with? On the other hand, connections made to "isolated" election equipment during the election season would be very pertinent - who, when, why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
#1,494
#1,494
Septic said:
Deflection.
Click to expand...
Yep but still a valid question given the stench of hypocrisy for anyone that are saying this is a waste of resources while ignoring that massive waste with the Mueller investigation. I really don’t care what audits they do. Biden is the POTUS and there’s no way the government will allow the system to be entirely torn apart. Small fraud here and there is fine but everyone on both sides looks even more inept if the fraud is widespread and neither side will let that happen.
 
#1,495
#1,495
BowlBrother85 said:
Election auditing is routine... and the results in Arizona have already been through two of them. The Big Four accounting firms (Ernst & Young, PwC, Deloitte, KPMG) have all performed audits of elections. I can't believe that anyone would defend Cyber Ninjas being hired for this.

I frequently see the Republican argument that "People who are confident that the results are valid, should not care if those results are audited".

Why didn't this logic apply to the 2000 Presidential Election? Republicans fought like hell from having the results from the state of Florida audited, and that was a much closer election than the results currently being audited in Arizona... and the outcome of the entire 2000 Presidential Election hung in the balance on that one state - which was decided by only 568 votes. An audit in Florida in December of 2000 really could have changed the outcome of the whole election. It was possible.
Click to expand...
Nice 20-year-old whataboutism!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain and AM64
#1,496
#1,496
BowlBrother85 said:
The problem is that legitimate questions are rarely even asked. The 2020 Trump Campaign has made blanket allegations of fraud and cheating, which are never specific in detail. Listen to Trump's phone call with Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger. Trump is incredibly vague with his accusations. He says things like "Something happened with Stacey Abrams" but never provides specifics of what the hell he is talking about. Trump follows that up with "I just need you to find the votes" (paraphrasing). What the hell was Raffensperger supposed to do with that?
Click to expand...
LOL. You went to the Adam Schiff school of interpreting I see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top