Arizona Election Audit

#2,158
#2,158
More and more things are coming out exposing all of the lies that have been said about Dominion being safe and secure. We will never have another fair election as long as we continue to use these corrupt machines.


 
#2,159
#2,159
BowlBrother85 said:
I don't think they will take back the Senate, but we will see.

This audit is a laughingstock. A big deal was made the other day by Trump and his supporters over the alleged deletion of election databases in Arizona. The VolNation poster who goes by the moniker @VolinWayne, made a big deal of it in this thread. However, Arizona auditors confirmed Tuesday during a Senate meeting that no Maricopa County election databases were deleted despite a previous allegation from the auditor's official Twitter account that election officials eliminated the evidence.

Ben Cotton, founder of a computer forensics firm working on the audit, told Senate President Karen Fann and fellow Republican Sen. Warren Petersen, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, that he recovered files that were supposedly deleted.

Ben Cotton tried to cover his butt with this lie: "I discovered an MFT that clearly indicated that the database was deleted from that server," but Cotton further added that, "All of this may be a moot point because subsequently, I've been able to recover all of those files and I have access to that data."

However, Maricopa County officials sent a 14 page letter with supporting documentation to Karen Fann on Monday which rebutted this claim of Cotton's, and showed that no database was ever deleted. The auditors couldn't find the data because of their own incompetence. Simply put, they didn't know where to look.

Of course, there will be no retractions from Trump and his supporters for jumping the gun on a provably false claim. They will just pretend it never happened, and move on to the next lie.
Click to expand...

Wherever the facts lead. That's all objective citizens should want. Sounds like there are some discrepancies and they are trying to get to the bottom of it. Maybe it's nothing but we're choosing sides in advance. Arizona has the right to audit their processes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, Vol737 and AM64
#2,160
#2,160
NEO said:
Honky cop?

You arent about 5 foot tall and moving up to the east side in a deluxe apartment in the sky, are you?
Click to expand...

Floyd is the progressives hero. It's like the 'I want to be like Mike commercials'.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#2,161
#2,161
hUTch2002 said:
You sure do love latching onto a tree only to miss the forest. No, the Steele dossier wasn’t the only thing but it was at the center of it. The whole Papadopolous set up was part as well and I’m sure there were some other factors. The point is that it was a political hit job. I know, I know, the left would never do such a thing, except they did and continued with other efforts to oust Trump no one would believe if they didn’t happen.
Click to expand...

Well, those were your exact words so if you knew there was more of a basis then maybe you shouldn’t have tried to overstate your case from the beginning.

I can get the rest of this from tourist trips to gateway pundit.
 
#2,164
#2,164
RockyTop85 said:
Well, those were your exact words so if you knew there was more of a basis then maybe you shouldn’t have tried to overstate your case from the beginning.

I can get the rest of this from tourist trips to gateway pundit.
Click to expand...
You’re funny. The point is that the whole thing was a sham yet there you are hanging onto one little word. Ok, you got me. I shouldn’t have said that was the only thing relied upon. It was still a sham investigation. I’m glad you agree since all you can do is attack that I said only when I shouldn’t have. Oh, and I’ve never read anything from gateway pundit as far as I know. If I did I certainly don’t recall it. Nice deflection attempt though. You do that well.
 
#2,166
#2,166
volinbham said:
oh I thought you were talking about the 1/6 Commission

nevermind
Click to expand...

I have no issue with a bipartisan commission to investigate what went down.

I feel the same about the election. But what the GOP did was hire partisan hacks who subscribe to a bunch of conspiracy theories with no experience conducting an audit and no clear process on performing the audit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: K-town Vol Fan
#2,167
#2,167
ClearwaterVol said:
I have no issue with a bipartisan commission to investigate what when down.

I feel the same about the election. But what the GOP did was hire partisan hacks who subscribe to a bunch of conspiracy theories with no experience conducting an audit and no clear process on performing the audit.
Click to expand...

both are politically motivated and the results are predictable
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol and AM64
#2,170
#2,170
hUTch2002 said:
You’re funny. The point is that the whole thing was a sham yet there you are hanging onto one little word. Ok, you got me. I shouldn’t have said that was the only thing relied upon. It was still a sham investigation. I’m glad you agree since all you can do is attack that I said only when I shouldn’t have. Oh, and I’ve never read anything from gateway pundit as far as I know. If I did I certainly don’t recall it. Nice deflection attempt though. You do that well.
Click to expand...

😂 “all you can do is get me to admit that the only point I’ve actually made is false, without trying.”

Keep going and maybe you’ll backtrack all the way to reality.
 
#2,171
#2,171
ClearwaterVol said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/05/19/gop-arizona-election-audit/
Click to expand...


This is nothing more then a hit piece attempting to shape public opinion. Notice how they are already know that the report will show fraud. I just skimmed through this article and the first thing that jumped out at me was the paragraph about checking for folds.

"The fourth reason was folding. The auditors reasoned that only absentee voters would fold their ballots; an in-person, Election Day voter would take a flat ballot, mark it in the booth and submit it, perfectly pristine. I almost had to laugh: In my experience, voters will fold ballots every which way, no matter where they vote or what the ballot instructs them to do. Chalk it up to privacy concerns or individual quirks — but no experienced elections official would call that suspicious".

Whoever wrote this article is pretty clueless. They are simply checking to make sure all mail-in-ballots have a fold in them. In other words, mail-in-ballots should all have a fold of some type in them. That's not rocket science.


This is the first true audit done
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldVolMan and AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top