Arizona Election Audit

#2,303
#2,303
AshG said:
Dominated would be a 15%+ loss in the popular vote. Is that how much she lost the popular vote by?
Click to expand...
Idk the numbers. I do remember the polls showing she was dominating, people laughing at the idea of him beating her, and then she lost. The entire 4 years following, it was nothing but Russia, Russia, Russia. People needed puppies, coloring books, and play dough at their jobs to deal with the loss, adults. Colleges had to cancel class, because teachers and students were crushed. I'd call that a dominating win, and I didn't even vote for the guy.
 
#2,304
#2,304
BowlBrother85 said:
This is a farcical exercise. No reasonably intelligent and objective person would think that this was a legitimate, fact-finding process of discovery. Arizona's Republican-controlled state Senate has already reached their desired conclusion that Donald Trump won the state of Arizona. Those Republican legislators in Arizona just need a third party to reach that same conclusion, and publicly announce it, when they present their set of "findings". Arizona Republicans can't do it themselves. That is where "Cyber Ninjas" comes into play, and it is the one and only reason as to why they were hired to begin with.
Click to expand...

It's theater, that's all it is. Playing to a mentally weak and easily compromised base that has no qualms about shutting down the logic centers of their brains in exchange for the satisfaction of being told they're in the right.

That paragraph can go to either side. The level of critical thinking in this country is pathetic.

The sad part is that it's going to work in this case. Come midterms, there's going to be a Red Rush at the polls, fueled by an unprovable narrative that they're not inclined to test. This is combined with a floundering DNC that is being pulled apart by its right wing and its kinda progressive wing. The Kinda Progressives aren't going to turn out this time, want it's going to result in a bloodbath.
 
#2,305
#2,305
joevol33 said:
Idk the numbers. I do remember the polls showing she was dominating, people laughing at the idea of him beating her, and then she lost. The entire 4 years following, it was nothing but Russia, Russia, Russia. People needed puppies, coloring books, and play dough at their jobs to deal with the loss, adults. Colleges had to cancel class, because teachers and students were crushed. I'd call that a dominating win, and I didn't even vote for the guy.
Click to expand...

Hilary Clinton handled a late lead about as well as Fulmer.

We really need a "they both suck, start over" option for elections. Our current process keeps giving us the worst of the worst to choose from instead of the best of the best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54 and joevol33
#2,306
#2,306
NCFisher said:
Yes, shabby, but she should have been removed from election duties by the legislature some time ago. Ironically, when the Senate took a hands-off approach to the audit, she complained the Senate was “abdicating any responsibility or engagement in the audit process,” and “dangerous and irresponsible.”

Wish granted, Ms. Hobbs.
Click to expand...
For years we heard about how Trump shouldnt be investigated by clearly biased sources. And that made sense, and was true. But now the Trump team is depending on clearly biased investigating of their own.

Two sides of the same coin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
#2,307
#2,307
AshG said:
It's theater, that's all it is. Playing to a mentally weak and easily compromised base that has no qualms about shutting down the logic centers of their brains in exchange for the satisfaction of being told they're in the right.

That paragraph can go to either side. The level of critical thinking in this country is pathetic.

The sad part is that it's going to work in this case. Come midterms, there's going to be a Red Rush at the polls, fueled by an unprovable narrative that they're not inclined to test. This is combined with a floundering DNC that is being pulled apart by its right wing and its kinda progressive wing. The Kinda Progressives aren't going to turn out this time, want it's going to result in a bloodbath.
Click to expand...
And y’all elected Joe Biden. Get back to me when you have some credible ground to stand on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#2,309
#2,309
AshG said:
It's theater, that's all it is. Playing to a mentally weak and easily compromised base that has no qualms about shutting down the logic centers of their brains in exchange for the satisfaction of being told they're in the right.

That paragraph can go to either side. The level of critical thinking in this country is pathetic.

The sad part is that it's going to work in this case. Come midterms, there's going to be a Red Rush at the polls, fueled by an unprovable narrative that they're not inclined to test. This is combined with a floundering DNC that is being pulled apart by its right wing and its kinda progressive wing. The Kinda Progressives aren't going to turn out this time, want it's going to result in a bloodbath.
Click to expand...
I hope you are right that it will be a bloodbath.

So which of the Biden policies have you all atwitter? And what was the critical thinking that led to open borders, crime thru the roof, and high unemployment as opposed to the opposite of all those things?
 
#2,311
#2,311
SpaceCoastVol said:
I hope you are right that it will be a bloodbath.

So which of the Biden policies have you all atwitter? And what was the critical thinking that led to open borders, crime thru the roof, and high unemployment as opposed to the opposite of all those things?
Click to expand...

I thought I'd worded it down the middle and expressed my disdain for both sides of this fallacious binary political system. Is the problem that I didn't outright insult everyone and everything not hyper conservative?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankenVol54 and zeppelin128
#2,317
#2,317
This is why we absolutely have got to get rid of voting machines and we have got to go back to paper ballots. Politicians from both sides have been saying this for years but then they never do anything about it. I think both sides are deeply involved and they don't want it to be fixed.


 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#2,318
#2,318
This is a video from 2008 showing the "security" measures for the ballots taken by New Hampshire SOS. The special security tape provided was a complete joke and could be removed very easily


 
#2,320
#2,320
joevol33 said:
Coming from the party that spent 4 years of spewing excuses and conspiracy theories about why Hillary got dominated 🤣
Click to expand...

Yeah. Maybe you guys shouldn't be pointing at others about Qonspiracy theories. Especially given the fact there's been zero evidence presented in court to support the claims of widespread voter fraud. All thd right has are theories and they're desperate to find supporting evidence to keep the narrative alive and the cash flowing.
 
#2,321
#2,321
Septic said:
Yeah. Maybe you guys shouldn't be pointing at others about Qonspiracy theories. Especially given the fact there's been zero evidence presented in court to support the claims of widespread voter fraud. All thd right has are theories and they're desperate to find supporting evidence to keep the narrative alive and the cash flowing.
Click to expand...

We have been over this a thousand times. How can you present evidence when the courts won't see the evidence. There are over a 1000 sworn affidavits and statements from Individuals alleging fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and TNVOLNAVY
#2,322
#2,322
VolinWayne said:
This is just typical of what happens in Fulton County. The corruption is so obvious and real.


Click to expand...
Sure, it is.

You will always have the same 4 core problems, but you never try to explain them:

1) Why did the Republican-controlled state legislature in Arizona hire the firm known as "Cyber Ninjas" to conduct this audit, if it wasn't completely about seeking bias confirmation?

2) Why are Republican members of the Arizona state legislature only contesting one election? Why not contest Mark Kelly's victory over Martha McSalley? That senate election was on the same ballot as the presidential election in Arizona.

3) Why would a Republican Governor and close Trump ally named Doug Ducey, have certified an election with fraudulent results against Donald Trump? Gov. Doug Ducey campaigned hard for Trump last year. Gov. Ducey is not a RINO. Ducey has been on the same page with Trump on immigration policy since the beginning of Trump's campaign in June of 2015.

4) What was wrong with the previous recount in Arizona? Can you point to any verifiable proof of fraud, which wasn't caught during that prior recount?
 
#2,323
#2,323
VolinWayne said:
We have been over this a thousand times. How can you present evidence when the courts won't see the evidence. There are over a 1000 sworn affidavits and statements from Individuals alleging fraud.
Click to expand...
Yes, we have... and you know damn well that this lame excuse doesn't hold true in every case.

In the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Pennsylvania, a Trump-appointed Judge named Stephanos Bibas, dismissed a case brought forward by the 2020 Trump Campaign legal team, because in the well-worded opinion of Judge Bibas, it had failed on its lack of merits. It wasn't dismissed because of a technicality or on a lack of standing. It was dismissed because the allegations which were made were not supported with proof. The 2020 Trump Campaign legal team had not even alleged that fraud had occurred, even though Judge Bibas had signaled his intention to allow new evidence to be presented, and for new witnesses to be called - that is if Attorneys representing the 2020 Trump Campaign wanted to make a case for fraud having occurred.... but they declined to do so.

That is presumably because, Attorneys representing the 2020 Trump Campaign were only willing to allege fraud while appearing on cable news shows. They would never allege fraud in court, where there could be consequences for their law licenses, if they were caught lying or making false allegations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyler Durden, zeppelin128 and Septic
#2,324
#2,324
VolinWayne said:
This is a video from 2008 showing the "security" measures for the ballots taken by New Hampshire SOS. The special security tape provided was a complete joke and could be removed very easily


Click to expand...
All of your posts come from the same 2 or 3 discredited sources. It's just more conspiratorial tripe, being advanced through an outright lie. You never address these allegations critically, or take the time to scrutinize them. You are eager to believe anything which suggests voter fraud, because you want to believe that Trump was cheated.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top