Arizona Election Audit

It doesn't ****ing matter who they hired, why is this so hard for you to understand? This isn't a search for the truth, this "audit" is to keep the pot stirred, the base fired up and the donations rolling in.

Everyone is aware it's all theater, we're just confused as to why people are buying the tickets to this sh*t show. I mean how stoopid are the people who are "fired up" and donating to this farse? I'd wager a disproportionate number of them live in Matt Gaetz's district.
 
Tools huh?
Ballot being examined by said tool

Carnac.jpg
 
Everyone is aware it's all theater, we're just confused as to why people are buying the tickets to this sh*t show. I mean how stoopid are the people who are "fired up" and donating to this farse? I'd wager a disproportionate number of them live in Matt Gaetz's district.

They’re as stupid as the people relentlessly complaining about it.
 
They’re as stupid as the people relentlessly complaining about it.

You keep going out of your way to make sure people know how little you care about the threads you actively participate in.

If you don't like discussing the topics, I'm sure there are circle jerks on Parler you'd find riveting.
 
I keep waiting for breaking news that the smoking gun has been presented in court that shows definitively that there was massive, widespread fraud and collusion to cover it up.

I'm starting to think I should have packed a lunch.
Yeah, you could’ve packed meals through the next election and you’d still be waiting. At least by then we will have another one to argue about.
 
You keep going out of your way to make sure people know how little you care about the threads you actively participate in.

If you don't like discussing the topics, I'm sure there are circle jerks on Parler you'd find riveting.

You are probably the most self unaware poster here.
 
You and BB are both blind to the purpose of this audit.
Oh no, I realize the Rs are only doing this to keep themselves relevant.

Just because the reason is bs is no reason to accept bs auditors. If anything its yet another thing everyone should be saying no to.
 
I have been saying the same things. I would also add that it will be used to justify further voting restriction legislation. Your buddy, @VolinWayne sees it differently though.


I'm still waiting on your thoughts on mail-in-ballots and folds. If mail-in-ballots are found without a fold in them would you consider that a fraudulent vote or no??
 
You're probably drawing another equivalency from the probe into possible collusion between the 2016 Trump Campaign and Russian agents, with the Q'Anon based conspiracy theories. They don't have the first thing in common. For one thing, it's a provable fact that Russia was responsible for hacking the DNC in 2016, and it is also a fact that members of the 2016 Trump Campaign (Trump Jr., Kushner and Manafort) did meet with Natalia Veselnitskaya and other Russian operatives in Trump Tower on June 9, 2016 to discuss dirt on Hillary Clinton. Both Trump and Trump Jr. told lies about what was discussed in this meeting, as well as who was in attendance. Also, per the United States Treasury Department, we now have a direct link between the 2016 Trump Campaign and Russian agents. Rick Gates, a top aide to Paul Manafort, gave Konstantin Kolimnik sensitive polling data and campaign information. In turn, Kolimnik gave this information to Russian agents, who used it to smear Hillary Clinton on social media. Finally, we also now know that Manafort lied about this to federal investigators. Manafort had previously said that NOTHING was given to Kolimnik by the 2016 Trump Campaign. So.. we have still more lies.

If you see any comparison to that with the fantasy land of Q'Anon.... then you can imagine me laughing my ass off at you as well.

I was just pointing out that you believe unreliable sources and then mock someone else that does the same. You do give a good example in your deflection though. What credible source ever stated what you said About Trump and Jr.?
 
Feel free to share you opinion. Let's go ahead and establish some things that would be factual evidence of fraud and not some biased opinion.
You never said if state law requires an specific envelope and folding. They may provide one size envelope but that doesnt mean people have to use it, or would be fraudulent to send it otherwise.

Just because there arent visual indicators doesnt mean fraud happened.
 
Feel free to share you opinion. Let's go ahead and establish some things that would be factual evidence of fraud and not some biased opinion.


Given that no "factual evidence" has been presented for scrutiny in any courtroom, your statement here is literally dripping with "biased opinion" irony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
Were there ballots counted that weren't folded? I admit I dont read a lot of the stuff you post.

There were witnesses and sworn affidavits of pristine ballots that had never been folded. That's one of the things they are using Jovan Pulitzer's scanner for. A lot of you guys are trying to discredit this audit and talk about how biased it is. I'm just trying to establish what are some things they could find that would absolutley be factual and you can't argue against it that it is indeed fraud.


You never said if state law requires an specific envelope and folding. They may provide one size envelope but that doesnt mean people have to use it, or would be fraudulent to send it otherwise.

Just because there arent visual indicators doesnt mean fraud happened.


All mail-in-ballots come in a specific envelope. You must return the ballot inside the security envelope.
 

VN Store



Back
Top