It's amazing what Derek Lowe's disastrous 2nd half and injuries have done to the starting pitching the last 2 months vs. the first half. It's literally Hudson followed by a cast of 5th starters.Biggest game of the year, and we have a 21 year old who isn't even suppose to be starting this year and spend next year in Triple A.
Just awesome.
It's amazing what Derek Lowe's disastrous 2nd half and injuries have done to the starting pitching the last 2 months vs. the first half. It's literally Hudson followed by a cast of 5th starters.
There aren't many teams that can absorb the loss of two of their top three starters in September. Wren gets a huge demerit for counting on Lowe, because it's been obvious for two years that he wasn't going to be somebody you could depend on, but there's really nothing that a GM can do to hedge against simultaneously losing two guys like Jurrjens and Hanson late in the year. It's just a bad.
One thing which I'd love to read about is how different the atmosphere in that clubhouse is this year. For 20 years we've heard about how the best thing about Bobby was his steadying influence on the team, not letting them get too up or down. Interesting that the first year Bobby's gone, boom, there's a huge collapse.
There aren't many teams that can absorb the loss of two of their top three starters in September. Wren gets a huge demerit for counting on Lowe, because it's been obvious for two years that he wasn't going to be somebody you could depend on, but there's really nothing that a GM can do to hedge against simultaneously losing two guys like Jurrjens and Hanson late in the year. It's just a bad break.
One thing which I'd love to read about is how different the atmosphere in that clubhouse is this year. For 20 years we've heard about how the best thing about Bobby was his steadying influence on the team, not letting them get too up or down. Interesting that the first year Bobby's gone, boom, there's a huge collapse.
Hardly the first time it's happened. Did the same collapse two years ago, though they weren't the wild card leaders. Had a decent shot at the playoffs in '09, but fell apart down the stretch.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
What's unfolding this year would be a choke job two orders of magnitude worse than what happened in 2009. That was a mediocre team that didn't expect to contend and never got closer than two games to the WC; this is a team which had designs on going deep in the playoffs and which had an 8 game lead in the WC for most of the year. Two weeks ago, Baseball Prospectus had Atlanta with a 98 percent chance of making the playoffs. Today it's 80.
I agree that this is much worse than '09. But I think the gist of your initial comment was to try and pin this on Fredi Gonzalez, which would be unfair, IMO. The Red Sox are in the midst of a bigger collapse than the Braves. Nobody us questioning Terry Francona's managerial skills.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
While I do in general think that Fredi Gonzalez is an idiot and a terrible manager, I'm not directly blaming the collapse on him. Because managers don't matter that much. (Terry Francona: idiot with the Phillies, great with the Red Sox. Torre: idiot with the Braves and Mets, great with the Yankees, then idiot again with the Dodgers once the team's finances started collapsing. Funny how payroll walks hand in hand with managerial "skill," isn't it?)
I'm mostly interested in what this potentially means retroactively about Bobby Cox, another indifferent tactical manager who owes his reputation to having a rotation full of Hall of Famers for most of his tenure. We always heard that Bobby's greatest skill was managing the clubhouse, keeping the team harmonious and on an even keel. Not too high, not too low. As someone who's always believed that, generally speaking, the difference between a good Strat-O-Matic player and a HOF manager would be, say, two or three wins a year at most, I always regarded that claim with a great deal of skepticism. I'm wondering whether what we're seeing this year indicates that maybe what they said about Bobby's clubhouse was true after all.
While I do in general think that Fredi Gonzalez is an idiot and a terrible manager, I'm not directly blaming the collapse on him. Because managers don't matter that much. (Terry Francona: idiot with the Phillies, great with the Red Sox. Torre: idiot with the Braves and Mets, great with the Yankees, then idiot again with the Dodgers once the team's finances started collapsing. Funny how payroll walks hand in hand with managerial "skill," isn't it?)
I'm mostly interested in what this potentially means retroactively about Bobby Cox, another indifferent tactical manager who owes his reputation to having a rotation full of Hall of Famers for most of his tenure. We always heard that Bobby's greatest skill was managing the clubhouse, keeping the team harmonious and on an even keel. Not too high, not too low. As someone who's always believed that, generally speaking, the difference between a good Strat-O-Matic player and a HOF manager would be, say, two or three wins a year at most, I always regarded that claim with a great deal of skepticism. I'm wondering whether what we're seeing this year indicates that maybe what they said about Bobby's clubhouse was true after all.