YankeeVol
Raised a Yank, Born a Vol
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Messages
- 139,341
- Likes
- 67,333
I heard a cop on TV use a term to describe the Atlanta situation that I found appropriate, "lawful but awful". I don't think the cops acted in an illegal way, but that doesn't mean they responded in the "right" way either. There were other alternatives, other decisions they could have made that wouldn't have resulted in the death of a man. That doesn't excuse the choices the man made himself, but cops are supposed to uphold a higher standard. No one had to die, and the onus is on the police to do everything possible to prevent that from happening.Running away while firing a stolen weapon is a little different
Well then by all means, let's root for Atlanta to burn like it's the return of Sherman.
I heard a cop on TV use a term to describe the Atlanta situation that I found appropriate, "lawful but awful". I don't think the cops acted in an illegal way, but that doesn't mean they responded in the "right" way either. There were other alternatives, other decisions they could have made that wouldn't have resulted in the death of a man. That doesn't excuse the choices the man made himself, but cops are supposed to uphold a higher standard. No one had to die, and the onus is on the police to do everything possible to prevent that from happening.
You forgot assaulting 2 officers and stealing a weaponThe minute he turned and began to fire he made his choice. When youre in that situation whoever gets the first shot on target wins. The officer doesn't have time to wait and see if he gets hit or not if he does its too late. How about instead we condem
1. Driving drunk
2. Resisting arrest
3. Running from cops
4. Pointing a weapon at officers
At 4 points Brooks couldve stopped and he would be alive right now
That sums it up perfectly.I heard a cop on TV use a term to describe the Atlanta situation that I found appropriate, "lawful but awful". I don't think the cops acted in an illegal way, but that doesn't mean they responded in the "right" way either. There were other alternatives, other decisions they could have made that wouldn't have resulted in the death of a man. That doesn't excuse the choices the man made himself, but cops are supposed to uphold a higher standard. No one had to die, and the onus is on the police to do everything possible to prevent that from happening.
The ball has been in the police's court for a long time. Now that they are getting some pushback, they want to take their ball and go home.Crying? Or rightfully leaving because their admin is using political statements instead of actual law and due process?