SEC commish slammed MSU yesterday. Sounds like information from MSU was leaked to the news before given to the officials. Why does MSU want this played out in the media before it was investigated? What other school benifits from this?
"During an interview today about the Newton case, Slive also called on the public to reserve judgment before "established facts" are determined and suggested disappointment in Mississippi State for not following procedures in reporting accusations to the league office."
"Slive said the original phone calls from Mississippi State in January generated enough information for the conference to seek more about what was said and to whom.
"We got some limited information," he said. "We said we need more information, go back and interview people."
"Without getting into any minute detail, for people to assume there was no follow-up for information (by the SEC office) would be wrong," Slive said. "There was timely follow-up from our office between January and July. As Mississippi State indicated, these requests were not fulfilled. We followed up in a timely way. Given the need for people to have a month or more to do that, we asked again. In six years, we've never had a problem with that."
An ESPN.com story earlier this week said Mississippi State made the SEC aware of the alleged conversations Cam and Cecil Newton had with Mississippi State "recruiters" regarding a pay-for-play plan. But the SEC has said Mississippi State did not report that information in January or July.
Asked why Mississippi State did not share that information with the SEC, Slive replied, "I never put myself in somebody else's head. That's really a question to ask somebody else other than me."