Carl Pickens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 45,153
- Likes
- 61,599
CNN Anchor Brooke Baldwin Blames Military Veterans for Baltimore Riots - Breitbart
Nice "Don't Hire Veterans, they are crazy" message CNN is pushing
I guarantee you the injury settlements that were paid out weren't the result of sliding around in he back of a van though....
Department policy governing "persons in police custody" now requires officers to use seat belts to "prevent the detainee from maneuvering out of the restraint and possibly causing injury to himself/herself or others." It also says officers are required to take detainees to the nearest medical facility upon request.
Find me 1 instance to back your claim? Name an instance were people rioted without a lengthy history of abuse of power?
I guarantee you the injury settlements that were paid out weren't the result of sliding around in he back of a van though....
They also have a history of killing police officers. Over 50 killed in the line of duty..
https://www.odmp.org/agency/214-baltimore-city-police-department-maryland
Weird. It's almost as if the Alston case in 1997 and then the Johnson case in 1998 where one was paralyzed and the other died due to head injuries sustained while cuffed in the back of a van that they weren't strapped into told them "we have a problem".
BCP have admitted they didn't strap Gray in.
I've been in an open compartment vehicle and not strapped in and it's pretty difficult to keep yourself lodged on the seat. If it was empty and I had my hands cuffed behind my back, yeah, I can easily see flying off and faceplanting on the other side of the van.
The stories that have come out of, most notably, Baltimore and Philly on this point to a trend of police driving recklessly while they have persons in their custody.
And Alston/Johnson were awarded $45mil but settled for ~$7mil together.
Weird. It's almost as if the Alston case in 1997 and then the Johnson case in 1998 where one was paralyzed and the other died due to head injuries sustained while cuffed in the back of a van that they weren't strapped into told them "we have a problem".
BCP have admitted they didn't strap Gray in.
I've been in an open compartment vehicle and not strapped in and it's pretty difficult to keep yourself lodged on the seat. If it was empty and I had my hands cuffed behind my back, yeah, I can easily see flying off and faceplanting on the other side of the van.
The stories that have come out of, most notably, Baltimore and Philly on this point to a trend of police driving recklessly while they have persons in their custody.
And Alston/Johnson were awarded $45mil but settled for ~$7mil together.
They already are. It was that way in Ferguson too. Someday it will most likely be shown that George Soros has a hand in provoking these riots. He's bragged about doing this sort of stuff in Latin America, and in some protests a while back in New York it was shown that the protestors had signs that were made by a company with ties to Soros. There are major outside players involved in stoking the fires.
The reality is that the NG would be doing the rioters a favor to go ahead and shoot to kill. 99% of the people in the news footage will never escape the ghetto. They're doomed to a life of dependence and depravity. For people like this life pretty much ends within a couple of years after they no longer qualify for the government welfare programs targeted at children. It'd be a mercy to go ahead and take them out at their peak before they succumb to drug dependence, gang violence, communicable disease, etc.
Yes, truly a merciful extermination of more minorities will help things.
You must be a Christian.
They also have a history of killing police officers. Over 50 killed in the line of duty..
https://www.odmp.org/agency/214-baltimore-city-police-department-maryland
SO how do you fix this "police brutality" problem?
Lax laws? Nope. More laws? Nope. No cops? Maybe..
Maybe more black cops because chances are high relate to the locals? Well according to my black friends those are the worst ones to be in the neighborhood. But then even if it answer was to add more black cops does that mean lowering entrance requirements like many cities have done to add minority cops? That isn't fair to the civilians or the police departments. But ignoring that as well what does adding more black cops do? Does that mean the black cops are going to patrol the black areas? Would this become some sort of law enforcement segregation?
Ill be honest as a white guy looking in a LOT of times it appears as black folks only want black folks in their areas (I wont argue with them about it). Reminds me of something I studied in history class. What was that called?...Oh yeah! segregation. But we all know it wont be the same because this time it wont be enforced by whites so it will be ok. Right?:crazy:
Step 1 - End the war on drugs
Step 2 - Follow the playbook that worked in racially divided 1970s Washington DC