You have a poor understanding of the basics of logic and argument. I did indeed provide detailed support for my points; the fact that your level of reading comprehension does not rise above Marvel comics is not my responsibility.You might want to look in the mirror.
You’ve provided no basis for any of your drivel. Just opinionated one-liners.
Ucla 11Except that 3 SEC teams have national championships and 8 of 14 have been in Final Fours.
Ucla 11
Kentucky 8
North Carolina 6
Duke 5
Indiana 5
Kansas 4
UConn 4
Villanova 3
Like I said we have Kentucky that’s it , these blue bloods I’ve mentioned will always rule College Basketball .
Why ? Because they invest a lot into it and they make it a priority . Especially when it comes to recruiting , UConn will have number 5 at the end of this tournament .
You omitted the fact that Smart is now at a basketball power and made it one round less than we did this year.
UConn isn’t thought of as a “blue blood” in most circles but they probably should be at this point.
You have a very poor understanding of the word, “support.” I’ll go out on a limb and venture that you’re not a lawyer.Because that doesn't have anything to do with the point...which is that coaches who go to "bigger" schools don't always do better than they did at smaller schools. In fact, Smart won big at VCU and now Marquette, but not Texas. If anything, that supports my point.