The questions is hypothetical. In scenario A, you make the final four this year. Nobody would be on the hotseat after that.
People saying B are nuts. You take the final four. Missing on Looney would stink, but making a final 4 will have other "Looney's" signing on the dotted line to play here.
Side topic...
What makes people confident Stokes stays? Let's say he finally develops a jumper (doubtful lmao) and has a great year. Does he leave?
Looney/Stokes would be nice.
I'd go with this, getting to the final four would put us on the recent-recruting trail and would give Cuonzo tournament success. We don't know if Stokes or Looney would get injured and also don't know how Looney will play out.You never turn down a final 4. Especially when you've never been to one before. I'm going with A.
Okay, Hypo-police.No still wrong.
It was hypothetical that we get looney.
On a serious, non-hypothetical note, why are you so nega-Looney? All reports seem to agree we have momentum, but you seem to think we've got no shot, curios why?
Neither A or B is going to happen...we are going to win it all this year, then Stokes goes pro and my OKC thunder pick him up, then we make another run with Looney next year![]()
PS I forgot to mention we beat Tiger high in the sweet 16 (Barton goes 4-6 from the 3 point line) then we beat UK in the final 4.
Then we fight off the zombie of Adolph Rupp and his legion of Calipari minions. BTO jumps off the roof of TBA with the flaming orange sword of truth and comes down on Bill Self, impaling him from head to groin. I'm in the background shredding on guitar, and it's so metal, it makes Jim Calhoun's head explode.
Late to the party. Hands down you go with A, and I question the intellect of anyone who says B. Seems to be most of the posters in this case. :crazy:
There's a reason for the saying a bird in the hand is better than 2 in the bush. I take the hardware up front instead of the potential hardware next year.
1st final 4 in UT history
CCM does something that Pearl could not accomplish
CCM has Stokes in the NBA as a junior.
If we make the final 4, then I'm assuming that McRae had a good enough year to make the NBA
CCM can now recruit saying that he can help get you to the NBA
CCM can now recruit with a tourney trip under his belt
CCM can now recruit with a final 4 under his belt.
I'm giving CCM enough credit that he can recruit top talent at the national level with a final 4 and players in the NBA under his belt. If not, then he may never be able to.
CCM is no way on the hot seat the year after a final 4.
I'm ready for something special this year. I'm not wanting to wait until next.
Anyone saying it's absolutely A no questions asked is equally as unintelligent. As I've said multiple times in this thread, there's plenty of teams who have made one final four and it didn't catapult them into a top 20 program with top recruits lining up at their doorstep.
I wonder who would have said in the beginning of 2009 what would you rather have?
A. UT's gets it's first Elite 8 and barely loses
B. UT gets Tobias Harris and all bets off on how far UT goes in 2011
What happened within that year with Tobias that became a huge distraction? If I remember correctly we started 7-0 and was up to 7th in the rankings before all the stuff with Bruce happened.