KingNick865
THE #1 COLLEGE DIFFENCE
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 14,070
- Likes
- 0
I don't know, Wyoming can get a two for one deal with Texas. Yeah, that's right. Texas, during the '09 season, played Wyoming in Laramie.
Didn't watch the game. Was watching USC-Cal and Aubie-Arky. Just going off of what I heard.
Still, my point stands. Texas isn't exactly a creampuff.
Good, that's the way it ought to be sometimes, the whole argument here is about the BCS dictating to everyone else where to go and what to do and how good or terrible you are because you don't belong to an AQ conference.
Boise has virtually no chance of losing and Oregon and Oklahoma still have fairly decent chances. Putting Boise #1 right now would be insane.
As it stands, they are ranked ahead of 4 unbeaten teams, 2 of which come from the conference that's won the last 4 National Championships.
Never said they were but my point is you can hold Va. Tech's loss to James Madison agaisnt BSU if you aren't going to hold Texas' loss to UCLA against OU. It's one or the other, not both.
I didn't say I thought Boise was no good. They just haven't put together a resume that would be strong enough to warrant consideration for a MNCG.
And there is a way to help your schedule. Take the damn 2 for 1's that've been offered to you. Lots of teams are willing to play Boise. It's just that none of them want to do it on BSU's terms.
They can do that for a game or two. If Boise State had Tennessee's schedule, they'd go 8-4.
Just out of curiosity, who do you think the 4 losses would be to? Maybe Oregon (they have already beaten basically that same team), Maybe LSU, and definitely Bama.
Who else in the SEC right now would give them a game? I don't think it is unreasonable to assume they would be a 10-2 team, at worst, with UT's schedule this year. Right now I think they would easily handle UGA and UF, and squeak past SC.
I don't know, I feel like BSU is probably tired of taking flak for being in a mid-major and doesn't want to play ball with the big boys like other members of their conference do. I say that knowing nothing of these deals, just that I would imagine they feel like they've earned the right to play a team like USC in a home and home series. If it were me that's how I would feel.
Just out of curiosity, who do you think the 4 losses would be to? Maybe Oregon (they have already beaten basically that same team), Maybe LSU, and definitely Bama.
Who else in the SEC right now would give them a game? I don't think it is unreasonable to assume they would be a 10-2 team, at worst, with UT's schedule this year. Right now I think they would easily handle UGA and UF, and squeak past SC.
Not the point, the point is that they are beating up on these teams like any elite program would. They have consistently shown over the years and this year that they do not play down to competition and when they play the big boys they handle business, go ask Bob Stoops and Chip Kelly what I'm talking about.
If Boise wants more home and home's, they need to drop the payout they require for an away game. They also need to learn that they won't get much more that they're getting now if they continue to try and negotiate games on their terms.
The only mid-major who can truly get home and home series without much bargaining is Hawai'i. Heck, USC plays in Honolulu all the time, it seems(even though it's just been '05 and '10).
Let's take a look at Boise State's BCS record over the last 10 years.
2000 - Arkansas (6-6, L 38-31); Washington State (4-7; L 42-35) - non-BCS record 10-0
2001 - South Carolina (9-3; L 32-13); Washington State (10-2; L 41-20) - non-BCS record 8-2
2002 - Arkansas (9-5; L 41-14); Iowa State (7-7; W 34-16) - non-BCS record 11-0
2003 - Oregon State (8-5; L 26-24) - non-BCS record 13-0
2004 - Oregon State (7-5; W 53-34) - non-BCS record 11-0
2005 - Georgia (10-3; L 48-13); Oregon State (5-6; L 30-27); Boston College (9-3; L 27-21) - non-BCS record 9-1
2006 - Oregon State (10-4; W 42-14); Oklahoma (11-3; W 43-42) - non-BCS record 11-0
2007 - Washington (4-9; L 24-10) - non-BCS record 10-2
2008 - Oregon (10-3; W 37-32) - non-BCS record 11-1
2009 - Oregon (10-3; W 19-8) - non-BCS record 13-0
Total record - 113-16
Total record against non-BCS opponents - 107-6
Total record against BCS opponents - 6-10
What a bunch of world-beaters. Boise State had more wins against 1-AA opponents (8-0) than against BCS opponents, who they played twice as often.
I'm still not above saying that MOV needs to be taken into account.