You're making it too complicated....let me help...they're saying that PEARL took the Vols EVERY year to the NCAA TOURNEY...as opposed to Coach MARTIN, who has taken the Vols to the NIT (First round loss) EVERY year so far...yeah Bruce topped out at Great Eight with some wrenching last second losses...you're right...we'rebetteroff...sooo let's just make the tourney and go for that Sweet Sixteen...it'd be ALMOST like the first time...I'm sure Bruce would stink at Chapel Hill...we're way off
Posted via VolNation Mobile
if CM was really smart he'd bring in Byrd and steal his offense from him. Don't have any idea why you'd stick with a 20 yr old stagnant offense when you can watch a team move and cut enough that would give your skilled players opportunities to shine and open up room for your average players to look good offensively.
Belmonts offense is largely predicated on having players 1-5 be able to make the 3, they took 37 threes yesterday, if this Tennessee team jacked up 37 threes we'd lose every time.
Belmonts offense is largely predicated on having players 1-5 be able to make the 3, they took 37 threes yesterday, if this Tennessee team jacked up 37 threes we'd lose every time.
I agree...facts are on my side...Bruce didn't lead us to the tourney every season he coached? And Cuonzo has? In what universe are YOU right? :blink:
Again, you can't laud Pearl's accomplishments without acknowledging the mess he left for Martin in the wake of the NCAA investigation. He is not without blame for our plight the last two years. Conversely, neither is Martin. They share the blame.
You're making it too complicated....let me help...they're saying that PEARL took the Vols EVERY year to the NCAA TOURNEY...as opposed to Coach MARTIN, who has taken the Vols to the NIT (First round loss) EVERY year so far...yeah Bruce topped out at Great Eight with some wrenching last second losses...you're right...we'rebetteroff...sooo let's just make the tourney and go for that Sweet Sixteen...it'd be ALMOST like the first time...I'm sure Bruce would stink at Chapel Hill...we're way off
Posted via VolNation Mobile
The "lost in the first round of the NIT" is the worst argument that is consistently brought up on this board.
Winning a game in the NIT is the definition of "kissing your sister."
It sucks we didn't make the NCAA tourney the last two years. Can we not just leave it at that? I'm not sure what is worse - going to the NIT or fans making a huge deal about losing in the NIT? I mean how do you motivate a team to play well in that thing?
The "lost in the first round of the NIT" is the worst argument that is consistently brought up on this board.
Winning a game in the NIT is the definition of "kissing your sister."
It sucks we didn't make the NCAA tourney the last two years. Can we not just leave it at that? I'm not sure what is worse - going to the NIT or fans making a huge deal about losing in the NIT? I mean how do you motivate a team to play well in that thing?
Exactly. If Half Season can't motivate his players until February, what's the use in getting up for the NIT? I mean, it's not like a part of his job description, right?