It's not hard to take your team to a bowl game when half of your games are against the dregs of div-1a. The only decent victory of the season was against a down georgia team.
Again, it never felt like UK was going to lose, barring a miracle. If you'll recall Clemson put on a late comeback to make the score (and yardage) closer. By that point, UK was just running clock and hanging on.
On VolInArizona's blog he says the following:
Tedford is generally heralded as God in Berkeley (which, in itself, is a freaking "does not compute" moment for me). Cal-Berkeley fans (1 dollar to Les Miles) continually assert that Tedford is one of the 10 best coaches in college football. One.of.the.10.best. Yeah, it pisses me off, too. He's done a good job with a dead program. Great, a lot of coaches have done that. However, it doesn't automatically put you in the upper echelon.
Show me another coach that has done this (posted on the cal board a couple of days ago):
From 2002-2007 Cal's winning % is 20th ranked for all D-1A teams
From 2004-2006 Cal's winning % is tied for 13th for all D-1A teams
Contrast the above numbers with where we were pre-JT.
From 1997-2001 Cal's winning % was 105th for all D-1A teams.
From 1999-2001 Cal's winning % was 109th for all D-1A teams.
I have ZERO respect for VIA (and KPT). He has been nothing but combative and condescending with me, seemingly for no reasons other than I will not coalesce to his hollowly false assertions of absurdity. I applaud your thread and support it 110%! VIA knows nothing about our football program, just like KPT! :machgun:
I have ZERO respect for VIA (and KPT). He has been nothing but combative and condescending with me, seemingly for no reasons other than I will not coalesce to his hollowly false assertions of absurdity. I applaud your thread and support it 110%! VIA knows nothing about our football program, just like KPT! :machgun:
I either agree with your assertion that most of those coaches are better than or think that some are at least on par with Tedford. The three in bold, however, stump me. It is way too early in the game to start singing Schiano's praises, Weis will run Notre Dame into the ground before he is done, and Ferentz is just Terrible.
Droski,
Tedford may be a good head coach, but if a comparision is going to made between two Pac-10 coaches ability, the location should be factored in.
Tedford is in California, a place that produces 20 times that amount of which Oregon produces. Cal is obviously goin' to have the edge when it comes to homegrown talent. Over the last 3 years, 75% of Cal's commits have come from their own backyard. That's got to say something there. Cal was a sleeping giant before Tedford arrived and he's scraped the surface of what that football program is capable of.
So while I agree that Tedford is a good Football coach at Cal, I do not believe he would be anywhere near as good at a place like Oregon or Kentucky.eace2:
Even though Droski and I disagree on Tedford's place in the current coaching landscape, I can say with 100% certainty that he respects my opinion far more than yours, Seth.
Jeff Tedford should drop to his knees every night and thank God for Kirk Ferentz. The Head Hawkeye is the only man standing between Tedford and the title of Most Overrated College Football Coach Of The Last Decade.