And everyone here would have still been wrong. Just like Big 10 fans were very wrong in 2006.Good grief at the lack of nonsense in here. If this scenario was UT and Florida from 1995 or so and the third team was some nobody from the big 12, no one in here would be arguing for the nobody from the big 12.
Also hard to argue 5 wins vs ranked BCS vs 3..ok St got screwed. They won their conference and Ala couldn't even win their division
I bet Michigan fans were using the same logic as Bama fans in 2006.
Good grief at the lack of nonsense in here. If this scenario was UT and Florida from 1995 or so and the third team was some nobody from the big 12, no one in here would be arguing for the nobody from the big 12.
That's the point. It's easy to make claims after the bowls. What if the Big 12 looks way better than the SEC during bowl season? It seems crazy to us now, but we can't really be sure.Both of those teams got destroyed in their bowl games. That argument is overplayed and pointless after seeing their bowl results.
Disagree. All teams should have the opportunity to play.
I would be happy UT got another chance, but I would at least understand there would be a * in the record books if UT won.
Bammers will go on saying they won their 27th national title, regardless.