LSU-SIU
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 12,691
- Likes
- 7,411
and again, if it was, and FL said no, regardless of the reason, why is that not out in front?
Generally speaking, I think LSU has done what they could in all aspects, at least till this point. Now I am not saying they will cooperate like parties might desire in the future but up till this point nothing further really could be done by them.
I think Alleva and King have addressed most of the main points, obviously they had to address some false stories ran by ESPN. Also, just remember probably not all the information has been made available, maybe LSU is telling a story which is not completely true. I doubt it, but lets wait to hear the SEC, which is funny how quiet they are.
It could be that LSU is at fault, but not based on the information we have available at the moment. imo It should have never been either LSU/UF's fault as the SEC should have mitigated the potential issues. So, its an SEC problem whether or not it was a plan.
The last problem with the SEC is they might have burned the bridge down to LSU by Stinkey misrepresenting facts Saturday on the air. Which is why LSU probably put in stipulations if October 29th was to be used. Trust in the SEC is gone as far as LSU is concerned at this moment, if I were to guess and maybe justifiable so.