cotton
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2005
- Messages
- 11,216
- Likes
- 9
He absolutely would have been more successful. If a dumbass like Jerry Green could win big with his players, you can bet KO would have as well. He's obviously a good basketball guy; you just don't get NBA jobs if you're an idiot. But, he has propensity to get involved in controversy that has led to him being a coaching nomad. My opinion is that schematically, he is head and shoulders above Pearl; however, Pearl is probably better at motivating players.
Is today not the future? Where is he?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Take it up with about three quarters of the UTAD, including the beloved play by play announcer. I don't care what you believe.
I'm not sure how to argue with someone who simply denies indisputable proof of their wrongness. You said he was not offered the Arizona job. I've linked an ESPN article and a quote from the Arizona AD positively dispelling that, yet you persist.
I guess you are winning?
He was offered the job as a recruiting tool. That's a fact that is indisputable. Their was no search, Lute could have returned, it kept stability, therefore it was out of default.
Your "proof" also mentioned the "future", so once again, oh wise one of history, where is he in this "future" your proof speaks of?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
The difference is O'Neill manages to find employment and never got fired from Tennessee.They fall back on his 90s record. In the end, all you O'neill supporters are sounding like gibbs defending Fulmer.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
The difference is O'Neill manages to find employment and never got fired from Tennessee.
And anyways, that still doesn't make your analogy less ridiculous. Fulmer defenders like Gibbs keep bringing up his record. That's not the same defense of O'Neill at all, so I'm not sure what makes you think the two are comparable.
That's still a completely different argument. O'Neill supporters are arguing there is more to O'Neill than just his record. Fulmer supporters like Gibbs try to cite games against Mike Dubose as evidence that Tennessee was destined for Atlanta in 2010, while supporters like vegasvol simply make up information.O'neill supporters can't bring up his record because he's a career loser. It mirrors Fulmer's record when he no longer had the Duboses of the world to out talent.
Why? The guy doesn't seem to have any problem finding a job.Maybe after bipolar O'Neill goes apeshat on Pat Hayden and his wife claws his eyes out,hatevol can give him a cushy paralegal job so he can live out his man crush in person.It must be tough to have that much love in a long distance relationship......:cray:
Maybe after bipolar O'Neill goes apeshat on Pat Hayden and his wife claws his eyes out,hatevol can give him a cushy paralegal job so he can live out his man crush in person.It must be tough to have that much love in a long distance relationship......:cray:
Why? The guy doesn't seem to have any problem finding a job.
That's still a completely different argument. O'Neill supporters are arguing there is more to O'Neill than just his record. Fulmer supporters like Gibbs try to cite games against Mike Dubose as evidence that Tennessee was destined for Atlanta in 2010, while supporters like vegasvol simply make up information.
That's your argument?Its keeping them he has a problem with and a .497 win record as a head coach and anyone defending that is not as knowlegeable as they claim to be.He also has been divorced as hatevol loves to point out about Pearl and O'Neill is not a model of character by any standard except the hypocrite hatevol....:yes: