Bryce Thompson out - potentially

Just got sent a pic of B Thompson booked by Knox PD - look for this to be surfaced by AM. Don’t kill messenger

This won’t have major implications. Needs to go to anger management class and have a better mentor.

I can honestly say that some of the worst mistakes of my life had to do with the worst women I have dated in my life. If you are not able to take care of the good ones, let ‘em go and grow up and then get back in the game.

So many athletes/people throw their lives away over young love.
 
Last edited:
If you are going to "play" you have to be smart and keep your cool "when" you get caught!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volanta
You misread what I typed.

The girl did not have bodily harm. Thompson never touched her.

The police responded and to make an arrest like that they have to fear for bodily harm to the girl. Hence the officers made a determination based on Thompson’s temperament at the time. They he could pose a threat of bodily harm to the girlfriend. Hence why he was arrested.

I gotcha now........sounds to me like an assault charge will likely either be reduced or dropped in this case...(banging my gavel)
 
No I just choose to believe impartial witnesses.

Again you’re assuming they are impartial, I only believe two things, facts and evidence, so far there is no fact that he said it, the only “evidence” is two contradicting articles.

Not enough for anyone to be kicking any student out of school
 
Again you’re assuming they are impartial, I only believe two things, facts and evidence, so far there is no fact that he said it, the only “evidence” is two contradicting articles.

Not enough for anyone to be kicking any student out of school
Regardless of contradicting articles, there is a witness account of him saying that. Why do you choose to believe the witness isn’t credible at this point without given any reason to believe so?

No ones saying kick him out. Just that these witness statement could leave to door open for UT to take action if they felt necessary.

Edit: there are people saying to kick him out - but that’s not what I am saying.
 
Regardless of contradicting articles, there is a witness account of him saying that. Why do you choose to believe the witness isn’t credible at this point without given any reason to believe so?

No ones saying kick him out. Just that these witness statement could leave to door open for UT to take action if they felt necessary.

Edit: there are people saying to kick him out - but that’s not what I am saying.
School isn't going to kick him out if he was never charged for it
 
Regardless of contradicting articles, there is a witness account of him saying that. Why do you choose to believe the witness isn’t credible at this point without given any reason to believe so?

No ones saying kick him out. Just that these witness statement could leave to door open for UT to take action if they felt necessary.

Because we don’t know what that person might hold against him. You can claim the witness is impartial all you want but with what has gone down in the past few years the school would be stupid to kick him out without hard proof, especially after a few years back when Von Pearson I believe was kicked out on unproven charges and then was allowed back in after lawyers got involved.

Do you really think they would take that chance again? Especially when Bryce hasn’t been charged with any form of domestic terror charges?

Their best bet would be to wait and see, then if he’s charged boot him, until then it’ll never happen, “impartial witnesses” or not.
 
If you google it, there are plenty of cases where kids get expelled despite being found not guilty in a court of law for a crime.

This is one thing you’ve said that I think is unequivocally true. There are cases going through the court system now where students are suing universities because they were tried and convicted of conduct violations and expelled on standards of proof that are questionable if they exist at all. These university conduct reviews are basically kangaroo courts that exist completely apart from criminal and civil law.

It’s a problem.
 
As mentioned a couple of times previously, TN Code § 39-13-101(a) (2)

Yeah, but you have to be able to 1) read, 2) comprehend, 3) understand how “imminent threat” is a legal term that doesn’t mean everything you may want it to mean.
 
tenor.gif
 

VN Store



Back
Top