hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,564
- Likes
- 162,734
I know you are trolling, but honestly...Tell me how I'm wrong? Cops finding any way to murder black people has been going on since this country's foundation. Now they were just given another way of doing it.
I think they were at the right house, but here are my issues:Cops can go into the wrong house, looking for a suspect already in custody, and murder someone with few repercussions. The sad thing is a lot of y'all want this.
I think they were at the right house, but here are my issues:
1. This was all over some drugs... fighting this drug war is a waste of time
2. They had apparently tracked down the package through the mail. So instead of safely engaging the suspect or package at some point along the route of tracking the package, they chose to serve a warrant at night on their home turf. Sounds like super genius police work... or this gave the cops the opportunity to play with their toys and justify their existence. They get to go pew pew pew and dress up in their special forces/SWAT gear.
They dont have to wait, that is the point of the no-knock.Since the warrant wasn't a no-knock how long are the cops obligated to wait for someone to open the door?
I think they were at the right house, but here are my issues:
1. This was all over some drugs... fighting this drug war is a waste of time (this is a discussion we have discussed previously, I'm not arguing for or against it)
2. They had apparently tracked down the package through the mail. So instead of safely engaging the suspect or package at some point along the route of tracking the package, they chose to serve a warrant at night on their home turf. Sounds like super genius police work... or this gave the cops the opportunity to play with their toys and justify their existence. They get to go pew pew pew and dress up in their special forces/SWAT gear. (They served the warrant to try to find things inside the home, they likely did it at night because that's usually a more likely time for drug dealing to occur and for people to be home, and you have a different definition of "toys" that I would. Glocks and simple rifles are not that big a deal, unless you are talking about the battering ram)
My understanding that the police did not have a no knock warrant, are you saying they did?They dont have to wait, that is the point of the no-knock.
I am not a fan of no-knock warrants except for serious threats to human life (they came about originally because of cases where police knocked on the doors and people were raped/killed by their captors)
But they did knock and announced. They had every legal right to do what they did to enter the house. They also had every right to return fire. Is anyone in a lather over the fact that had he not shot first she would still ,in all likelihood, be alive? Are her parents filing a wrongful death suit against him?I think that's his point. If someone busts your front door down I'm thinking it's kill or be killed. What possible crime could local police be investigating that they need a "no knock" warrant and apparently they didn't have one. Now if they didn't allow someone to answer the door and then broke the door down the cops are screwed.
They dont have to wait, that is the point of the no-knock.
I am not a fan of no-knock warrants except for serious threats to human life (they came about originally because of cases where police knocked on the doors and people were raped/killed by their captors)