InVOLuntary
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 59,868
- Likes
- 139,135
Didn't watch the clip so I'm not sure.I'm pointing out that you apparently called him and Cuomo non-representative idiots.
Cuomo was the Democrat mayor of New York. Non-representative to the extreme.Didn't watch the clip so I'm not sure.
But if they refuse to condemn violent and destructive rioting, then yes, they are non-representative idiots.
Kind of like I hope Rush, Sean, and Tucker are non-representative idiots of the right.
Technically, you are correct. Technically, not all of the people on the streets were intending on rioting and looting.You guys hate the truth. The vast majority of the people protesting were doing just that.
A few idiots used it as cover to be idiots.
I know you guys are desperately trying to convince the mindless that the left is rioting and burning down cities and shooting cops.
That's total BS. The left is appropriately exercising their right to peacefully protest. Some idiots being out of control does not change that fact.
We don't know if she was really innocent. Unfortunately, she was killed. I think there is enough evidence that she was knee deep in the drug trade in one way or another. I'm not sure where you're getting your 1 out of 4 stuff. I've never posted anything about 1 out of 4.
As someone who was turning 14, and interested in politics when Kennedy was killed, I don't remember hearing about number 3 at all, or thinking that number 1 was a detriment to his election. The Kennedy clan hadn't made that much of an impact in politics by 1960. 2 was a small problem, and 4 was kept under the wraps from the public at that time.