You’re going to have to.
These are anecdotal, and in most cases unverified, fringe, second hand news sources.
One is from someone who didn’t even get elected to office. This is bad even for you. This is clear confirmation bias, taking what you believe and then finding the most obscure references to racism and conflating that to “white nationalism.”
Here was the first example of racism. This picture.
![3152E0C1-0DCE-4DED-A9FD-E471163B6047.png 3152E0C1-0DCE-4DED-A9FD-E471163B6047.png](https://www.volnation.com/forum/data/attachments/303/303789-83195525474250de433df5b367140bfe.jpg)
Here is another quote from that article.
Sue Piner, chair of the Comal County GOP, shared a post on her Facebook page with a picture of liberal billionaire George Soros, who is often the target of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, with a fabricated quotation attributed to him that read, “I pay white cops to murder black people. And then I pay black people to riot because race wars keep the sheep in line.
That’s white nationalism? Umkay. This is a typical tactic of leftists. You redefine terms according to your own bias so you can say “look racism.” It’s BS and you should know better.
Lastly let’s look at the opening paragraph and see how this is 100% presumptive.
.After GOP leaders in 12 counties posted racist responses to the George Floyd protests, top Republicans declared war on bigotry in their party. It’s not going to be easy.
It assumes what it is going to attempt prove. It stitches together a few random, unconnected, incidents that may lack taste but certainly aren’t evidence of white nationalism. That is called begging the question.
The article wraps up by doubling down on the same.
What does this all add up to? Well, for one, a demonstration that if Mark Zuckerberg had instituted a maximum age limit on his demonic website early on, the country would be a different place. In truth, these kinds of sentiments are not uncommon among conservative activists in Texas. Far from it: they’re a dime a dozen, and they have been for years.
This is no different than the Right wing conspiracy nuts that post articles from fringe journals. The difference is you source poisoned without doing what I just did. Actually reading dissecting the article to expose its error and fallacy. You should take notes and learn.
The white nationalist narrative was paramount to promoting the racist you just elected. A guy who actually called black children roaches, made being poor and dumb synonymous with being black, and said if you don’t vote for him you aren’t really black. Only a person being propped up by the media at large could say those things and be virtually untouched or challenged.
Lastly, and most importantly, the article claims the top GOP leader are intolerant of anything that even smells of racism and that they are the ones taking action. It actually undermines the point you’re trying g to make.