BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 44,136
- Likes
- 38,523
Shouldn't the burden of proof rest with the party who is making the claim of malfeasance? The absence of material evidence does necessarily serve as proof that it hasn't happened... at least not to the degree that you suggest it has.And you don't either hence stop trying to find loopholes.
Think about the logic of what you are doing. You are making a claim that mail-in voting results in mass voter fraud, but you acknowledge that you have no evidence in support of that claim. You then try to shift the burden of proof to me, to prove a negative occurrence, by basically saying that "you can't prove that it doesn't happen," but I'm not the one who should be proving anything. You are the one making the accusation of wrongdoing.