Cancel Dr. Seuss

#53
#53
hUTch2002 said:
Good question for your Dem buddies from the 2016 election.
Click to expand...

You're lying. The 2016 Democratic candidate conceded the election after it was called by the news media. She did not declare that the election was stolen or sponsor a mass rally to incite sedition. There was no insurrection by a Democratic mob storming the Capitol when the Electoral College votes were being counted. Iirc, there was one vote against recognizing the Electoral votes, and the Democrats in both the House and Senate refused to give that lone voice any support whatsoever. Do you have no integrity at all, none? Have you shame?
 
Last edited:
#54
#54
Vol Main said:
You're lying. The 2016 Democratic candidate conceded the election after it was called by the news media. She did not declare that the election was stolen or sponsor mass rally to incite sedition. There was no insurrection by a Democratic mob storming the Capitol when the Electoral College votes were being counted. Iirc, there was one vote against recognizing the Electoral votes, and the Democrats in both the House and Senate refused to give that lone voice any support whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Russia Russia Russia!
🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, Rickyvol77, NEO and 3 others
#55
#55
Vol Main said:
You're lying. The 2016 Democratic candidate conceded the election after it was called by the news media. She did not declare that the election was stolen or sponsor mass rally to incite sedition. There was no insurrection by a Democratic mob storming the Capitol when the Electoral College votes were being counted. Iirc, there was one vote against recognizing the Electoral votes, and the Democrats in both the House and Senate refused to give that lone voice any support whatsoever.
Click to expand...

More Dem Congressional members made official objections to EC certifications in 2017 than GOP members did in 2021 so he (or she) is not lying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77, NEO, Vol737 and 1 other person
#56
#56
Vol Main said:
You're lying. The 2016 Democratic candidate conceded the election after it was called by the news media. She did not declare that the election was stolen or sponsor mass rally to incite sedition. There was no insurrection by a Democratic mob storming the Capitol when the Electoral College votes were being counted. Iirc, there was one vote against recognizing the Electoral votes, and the Democrats in both the House and Senate refused to give that lone voice any support whatsoever.
Click to expand...
There's always a Tweet and yes Dems told members of the Electoral college to ignore the election and vote "their conscience" 20210302_204315.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: TrumpedUpVol, Rickyvol77, NEO and 2 others
#57
#57
Vol Main said:
You're lying. The 2016 Democratic candidate conceded the election after it was called by the news media. She did not declare that the election was stolen or sponsor a mass rally to incite sedition. There was no insurrection by a Democratic mob storming the Capitol when the Electoral College votes were being counted. Iirc, there was one vote against recognizing the Electoral votes, and the Democrats in both the House and Senate refused to give that lone voice any support whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Dems tried their best to get electors to not vote for Trump...You have a poor memory or bad news sources Democratic presidential electors revolt against Trump
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
#60
#60
Vol Main said:
You're lying. The 2016 Democratic candidate conceded the election after it was called by the news media. She did not declare that the election was stolen or sponsor a mass rally to incite sedition. There was no insurrection by a Democratic mob storming the Capitol when the Electoral College votes were being counted. Iirc, there was one vote against recognizing the Electoral votes, and the Democrats in both the House and Senate refused to give that lone voice any support whatsoever. Do you have no integrity at all, none? Have you shame?
Click to expand...

Where did the evil conservatives hurt you precious? LMAO, you are so weak and pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, mr.checkerboards, VolnJC and 1 other person
#61
#61
Vol Main said:
Why are you suggesting that I try to ban books? That is not what I said in my post.
Click to expand...

You just want to try and flip everything back on Rs. You and TNRibs are pathetic. Then you have to bring the capitol crap into bolster your argument. The party you align yourself with is the lowest form or pathetic weakness we have ever seen. And you will bring up anything to justify it.

Speaking of the capital stuff, why do you assume that all Rs or Trump supporters for that matter, supported what a bunch of fringe Q supporters did?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#65
#65
VolnJC said:
Dems tried their best to get electors to not vote for Trump...You have a poor memory or bad news sources Democratic presidential electors revolt against Trump
Click to expand...

Oh my memory is not so bad. Yes, there were objections from House members, but no Senators supported any of them, and every one of them was overruled by Vice President Biden. There was no Clinton rally in DC, no mob attack on the Congress. Here is the text of Clinton's concession speech, given the morning after election day.
Read Hillary Clinton's Concession Speech for the 2016 Election
 
#66
#66
Vol Main said:
Oh my memory is not so bad. Yes, there were objections from House members, but no Senators supported any of them, and every one of them was overruled by Vice President Biden. There was no Clinton rally in DC, no mob attack on the Congress. Here is the text of Clinton's concession speech, given the morning after election day.
Click to expand...

doesn't change the fact that there were more objections in 2017 than in 2021.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737 and VolnJC
#67
#67
Vol Main said:
Oh my memory is not so bad. Yes, there were objections from House members, but no Senators supported any of them, and every one of them was overruled by Vice President Biden. There was no Clinton rally in DC, no mob attack on the Congress. Here is the text of Clinton's concession speech, given the morning after election day.
Read Hillary Clinton's Concession Speech for the 2016 Election
Click to expand...
Yep after Obama pretty much threatened her...you really are pretty bad at remembering facts Insiders account reveals Obama twice phoned hesitant Clinton, pushing her to concede election defeat | National Post
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#69
#69
VolnJC said:
Yep after Obama pretty much threatened her...you really are pretty bad at remembering facts Insiders account reveals Obama twice phoned hesitant Clinton, pushing her to concede election defeat | National Post
Click to expand...

The facts are that Clinton conceded the morning after election day and Trump never did. I realize that you become easily confused by right wing media, but those facts are simple enough for anyone to understand. Morning after the election versus never. Morning after the election versus never. No rally versus a Trump Campaign financed "stop the steal" rally. Does that difference register with you? When Clinton lost, there was a peaceful transfer of power. When Trump lost, he refused to concede and incited a mob to violently attack the Capitol. I don't think you are too stupid to understand those differences. You do seem to lack the little integrity needed to admit them.
 
#70
#70
Vol Main said:
The facts are that Clinton conceded the morning after election day and Trump never did. I realize that you become easily confused by right wing media, but those facts are simple enough for anyone to understand. Morning after the election versus never. Morning after the election versus never. No rally versus a Trump Campaign financed "stop the steal" rally. Does that difference register with you? When Clinton lost, there was a peaceful transfer of power. When Trump lost, he refused to concede and incited a mob to violently attack the Capitol. I don't think you are too stupid to understand those differences. You do seem to lack the little integrity needed to admit them.
Click to expand...

How did he incite a mob to attack? Please provide the proof that Trump told ADULTS to act violently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#71
#71
Vol Main said:
The facts are that Clinton conceded the morning after election day and Trump never did. I realize that you become easily confused by right wing media, but those facts are simple enough for anyone to understand. Morning after the election versus never. Morning after the election versus never. No rally versus a Trump Campaign financed "stop the steal" rally. Does that difference register with you? When Clinton lost, there was a peaceful transfer of power. When Trump lost, he refused to concede and incited a mob to violently attack the Capitol. I don't think you are too stupid to understand those differences. You do seem to lack the little integrity needed to admit them.
Click to expand...

and you seem to gloss over the "Resistance" effort in all its forms and facets

neither party comes out looking good on the last 2 elections
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, Wireless1 and VolnJC
#73
#73
volinbham said:
I hate this type of journalism/writing

"But Dr. Seuss had a long history of publishing racist and anti-Semitic work, spanning back to the 1920s when he was a student at Dartmouth College. There, Dr. Seuss once drew Black boxers as gorillas and perpetuated Jewish stereotypes by portraying Jewish characters as financially stingy, according to a study published in the journal "Research on Diversity in Youth Literature.""

This short paragraph begins with what appears to be a general statement of fact. It goes on to cite an example that comes from the study but it's not clear if the "statement of fact" is indeed an independent fact or a conclusion from this particular study. Also were there many, many more of these examples as the statement "long history of" implies? Who knows?

If the latter (which I'm guessing it is) why not begin by saying this study claims (insert statement of fact).
Click to expand...
This type of “experts say” journalism to push a narrative is a major reason why the profession is dead and not respected by anyone
 
#75
#75
Vol Main said:
The facts are that Clinton conceded the morning after election day and Trump never did. I realize that you become easily confused by right wing media, but those facts are simple enough for anyone to understand. Morning after the election versus never. Morning after the election versus never. No rally versus a Trump Campaign financed "stop the steal" rally. Does that difference register with you? When Clinton lost, there was a peaceful transfer of power. When Trump lost, he refused to concede and incited a mob to violently attack the Capitol. I don't think you are too stupid to understand those differences. You do seem to lack the little integrity needed to admit them.
Click to expand...
Wow just take the loss..you keep digging it deeper..the fact is that Trump is the one who told the National Guard to be in DC on the 6th...he never told anyone to act violently
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and Wireless1
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top