Carroll v. Trump ($88 million judgment for Carroll)

Trump was found not guilty of rape therefore Carroll defamed Trump lying that he raped her..Trump should sue her for defamation. Trump has a right to defend himself against this liar and defending himself against a liar is not defamation.

Agreed. Carroll was publicly reporting Trump raped her. Trump then publicly reported she lied. Apparently according to the left, the former is ok but the later isn't.
 
I did not follow the trial closely until the verdict was announced, but I'm reading from court observers that Habba Dabba Doo didn't make make basic evidentiary objections at trial that would have provided her with a basis to appeal.


An appeal will be made

Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
·
15h

BREAKING: In a heated press gaggle, Alina Habba confirms that President Trump will immediately appeal a New York court's order to pay $83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll for defamation.
 
you admit it was witch hunt. Other liberals here won't admit that and claim it was all a "fair" trial when anyone with half a mind could see it was not fair. Biden got something done...highest inflation in decades prices up 17%, food up 20%, Afghanistan, started wars, invasion of the southern border, weaponized DOJ against rival, military in worse shape in many decades, lies all the time about things and has made a general mess of everything as Dem presidents as Obama, Clinton, Carter have done. Lowest approval rating shows the public sees he's incompetent. Others are running the show Biden is just a puppet who does not know where to stand or go to in press events. Stolen elections have consequences.


"Biden has attained virtually no successes as president. But as the above list attests, he has produced a lifetime's worth of major failures in less than a year."

1. DJT is like a dead carcass on the side of the road and 1 vulture shows up and within 30 minutes you have 20 vultures. Does not take much to call it a Witch Hunt. So what, he did what he did.
2. Biden and inflation pretty high. You didn't live through the Carter years did you.
3. Your ignorance shows regarding Afghanistan, military operations and I don't have time to educate you.
4. Approval Rating...I have seen worse.
5. Stolen Elections. Seriously. 3 years plus Failed to prove. Denial is a strange thing.

You can't even correctly link websites to your argument and even using blue font. Waste of my time.
 
1. DJT is like a dead carcass on the side of the road and 1 vulture shows up and within 30 minutes you have 20 vultures. Does not take much to call it a Witch Hunt. So what, he did what he did.
2. Biden and inflation pretty high. You didn't live through the Carter years did you.
3. Your ignorance shows regarding Afghanistan, military operations and I don't have time to educate you.
4. Approval Rating...I have seen worse.
5. Stolen Elections. Seriously. 3 years plus Failed to prove. Denial is a strange thing.

You can't even correctly link websites to your argument and even using blue font. Waste of my time.
this is just weak
 
  • Like
Reactions: FortSanders
This case is why dudes should never tell 1 night stands/temporary girlfriends their real name, what they do, or where they live.
 
Agreed. Carroll was publicly reporting Trump raped her. Trump then publicly reported she lied. Apparently according to the left, the former is ok but the later isn't.


The judge in the first trial affirmed that he sexually assaulted her. Two juries agreed that he defamed her. EVERYBODY'S always wrong
but the gangster, eh? Judges all over the country, juries, grand juries, prosecutors, FBI, Justice Department, GOP state election head, women assaulted by trump,consumers defrauded by trump, all the people who worked in his administration and the White House who hate him and find him totally unfit for public office....and MANY more. Eh? Stop being clods. You embarrass yourselves, every day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
For those that claim to be members of the party of "Rule of Law", they know nothing about it.

Trump's side had the opportunity to present a defense in May: They chose not to

Trump's side had the opportunity to provide physical evidence (DNA) during discovery for May Trial: They chose not to by the discovery timeline.

Trump's side had opportunity to present qualified expert witnesses in May Trial: They couldn't get them qualified

Trump's side had extra discovery opportunity with the Hoffman stuff in May Trial: They couldn't take advantage of it

Trump's side could have got her prior tweets and allegations into evidence in May Trial: Once again, they missed the deadlines

Trump could have testified in May: He chose not to

No matter how flimsy the other side's case is, when you choose not to present a competent defense, you run the risk of losing a civil trial. That's what happened here.
 
Trump was the innocent party here, Carroll falsely accused Trump of rape and Trump was found not guilty of rape...Carroll defamed Trump, she should be paying Trump millions.

Tell me, and be honest. Are any of the things Donny's been accused of or found guilty of true in your opinion?

When you claim he's a victim and he keeps getting convicted or found liable - will your tune ever change? Or is the DOJ, IRS, FBI, CIA, the totality of the government and its establishment including multiple federal judges in multiple States, district judges in multiple States, District Attorneys and the jury's all in cahoots? Or, it it possible your idol is simply an a**hole who's getting his comeuppances? I'm sure all of the rando twitter sources you trot out are privy to the "real" truth - your echo chamber seems to have the market cornered on that.

You trumpers are defending a guy that sexually assaulted a woman and then went out of his way to trash her publicly. It's astonishing to watch you willingly die on that hill of defending a guy that everyone on the planet heard admitting to sexually assaulting women for sport. I'm starting to think that the people who keep defending him are simply projecting their own low moral and ethical character in an attempt to feel better about themselves.
 
On a side note when the state of NY made the special allowance that allowed Carrol to file this suit had anyone else taken advantage of it? And if so did they win as well.?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FortSanders
On a side note when the state of NY made the special allowance that allowed Carrol to file this suit had anyone else taken advantage of it? And if so did they win as well.?

There have been other allegations brought agianst other people. Most are either settled or tossed out...
 
On a side note when the state of NY made the special allowance that allowed Carrol to file this suit had anyone else taken advantage of it? And if so did they win as well.?

The law is no longer in effect, it allowed a 1 year window then sunsetted. It was specifically passed so that she could file her initial lawsuit.
 
The law is no longer in effect, it allowed a 1 year window then sunsetted. It was specifically passed so that she could file her initial lawsuit.

That's somewhat debatable since it has been a trend nationwide to lengthen SOL for sex crime civil cases. Her case didnt hurt getting it passed but NY isn't a complete outlier here...
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
An appeal will be made

Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
·
15h

BREAKING: In a heated press gaggle, Alina Habba confirms that President Trump will immediately appeal a New York court's order to pay $83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll for defamation.
Awesome. We have it from the mouth of the person who didn't know that she should be objecting at trial in order to preserve matters for appeal that she will appeal.
 
Come on, why only open the window for 12 months then?

Before any of these allegations became public, NY went to from 3 to 20 year SOL for any new civil cases (2019 and later) involving sexual assault.

The 2022 bill enacting the 12 month window was to give a 1 time "civil case bite at the apple" for cases 2018 and earlier. Remember, Weinstein and Epstein cases largely drove this...

Once again, Trump could have presented a defense but chose not to.
 
Before any of these allegations became public, NY went to from 3 to 20 year SOL for any new civil cases (2019 and later) involving sexual assault.

The 2022 bill enacting the 12 month window was to give a 1 time "civil case bite at the apple" for cases 2018 and earlier. Remember, Weinstein and Epstein cases largely drove this...

Once again, Trump could have asked his parking garage attorney to present a defense but chose not to.
Fixed last line if your post.
 
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, to hear the regular "they're all out to get Trump" whiners whining about this.
Weird how the ones who claim not to regularly make passionate use of a Donald J. Trump blow up doll still just assume that all the bad things that happen to him are somebody else’s fault or part of a witch hunt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Jeff Clark
@JeffClarkUS

Let me make a mathematical point about the new E. Jean Carroll verdict — actually a mathematical point combined with a point about the law of preclusion.

The original verdict was about $5 million, which should be res judicata between Trump and Carroll for damage to her reputation.

But the new verdict is over $83 million.

This makes no mathematical sense and cannot be squared with the law of preclusion. The only way that the damages for renewed defamation could exceed the original $5 million is by virtue of a new punitive damages component which itself cannot be unmoored to baseline compensatory damages. A reputation once injured and compensated cannot be recompensed a second time at more than an order of magnitude higher than the original recompense.

But the damages here do not meet those basic conditions. Ergo, it is illogical. Ergo, it is illegal. Ergo, it is a travesty of justice.

Q.E.D.
Pure word salad lol, trying to avoid confronting the core concept of punitive damages by just saying "ergo" a bunch of times
 
The $83MM will either be knocked down or settled at a fraction of the amount. This happens most of the time with excessive jury awards.

Having outrage at this amount (which will be lowered) or the bipartisan law change that allowed this case to happen completely ignores the fact that DJT had the opportunity to hire qualified experts, provide evidence, testify, present a defense and HIS TEAM CHOSE NOT TO in the May 2023 Civil trial.
 
The two juries (combined) was 13M 5F. That's about as favorable of a gender split as DJT could have reasonably expected (Males more conservative politically and less likely to be swayed emotionally in sexual assault case)....
 
So when Biden was accused of sexual misconduct before the '20 election, it was quickly dismissed and never spoken of again. But when when Trump is accused 25 years after the fact then it's back to believe all women & Pound (#) me too!
 

VN Store



Back
Top