i think so too. even though if you prove one you likely prove the other the jury still is going to have a higher burden of proof for a first degree charge. human nature.
i think so too. even though if you prove one you likely prove the other the jury still is going to have a higher burden of proof for a first degree charge. human nature.
In the state of FL, the jury is allowed to consider lesser included charges even if the state is seeking the maximum charge. So manslaughter or non-felony murder were options. The jury didn't have to be convinced that the crime was 1st degree felony murder. Turns out they weren't convinced that Anthony murdered her daughter.
That's a new one. So, is that misdemeanor murder?
what the hell is non-felony murder again? You mean murder? Why not call it non-chickensoup murder? How about non-goat murder? I like non-SEC murder. Give it a try."Felony muder" is when murder is committed in the act of committing another crime. In this case the qualifying crime was child abuse.
Non-felony muder is murder committed without another crime having been committed.
The fact that you don't understand that suggests that your opinions on this case are worthless.
"Felony muder" is when murder is committed in the act of committing another crime. In this case the qualifying crime was child abuse.
Non-felony muder is murder committed without another crime having been committed.
The fact that you don't understand that suggests that your opinions on this case are worthless.
I understand perfectly what felony murder is. You said "non-felony murder" was an option. So, in your brilliantly made up definition, that would be any murder charge. Of course, no one refers to any murder charge as "non-felony" murder except you apparently. Most people that have a clue just call that plain old murder. But, nice job trying to make yourself look smart.