luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,915
- Likes
- 20,008
Maybe you are, but that makes it a ridiculous conversation for our purposes.
I understand why you wish to limit the scope, otherwise you would be forced to admit that our poverty isn't a function of dem. policies.
Why not just talk about inner city poor?
Norplants? Tube tying? IUDs? Morning after pills?
It's worked, just not well enough. There is no way to even conceive what this nation would be like today had the birth control we did.
This is very myopic.Lol. Not even close.
People already break the gun laws in what they are doing. Or what you believe is happening.
Adding more gun laws will not fix that. Its naive in the extreme.
It's like believing the limiting the number of cars a person buys determines how many people will speed. I mean cars are registered. Surely limitting the number a person can own will make them safer drivers right?
As others have pointed out, if it was the people collecting guns that were the issue, the issue would be a LOT worse.
No. They don’t.This is very myopic.
Having licensed drivers and registered vehicles absolutely makes the roads safer.
This idea that guns don’t need to be registered is crazy.
I'm all for the traditional family. I also know it's not for everyone and there are those who would love a traditional family but it just doesn't work out.Well lets talk about the norplants, tube tying and all of that. Women have over two dozen forms of birth control, and yet we still have women that have unplanned pregnancies. Women are the gatekeepers. If they allow themselves to get pregnant either by their own negligence or by allowing an immature/irresponsible male to enter her and get her pregnant, then the problem isn't going to be fixed with more birth control options.
With regards to your "Why not just talk about inner city poor" comment... You can call it whatever, because the 40-50 year experiment on the black community is successfully being implemented on the larger society. The answer to fix the problem involves restoration of the traditional family (man as the head, woman as the caretaker/homemaker) and going away from the liberal philosophy of govt dependence for daily needs.
I disagree. Licensed drivers can pass a standard exam and a brief road test. It is safer than simply handing the keys with a pat on the back but the licensing process doesn't make it safer. Registration of vehicles has nothing to do with making either the vehicles or the roads safer.This is very myopic.
Having licensed drivers and registered vehicles absolutely makes the roads safer.
This idea that guns don’t need to be registered is crazy.
How do you suggest that we go about making people be more responsible? Because the way the system is set up right now thanks to liberals, women are incentived to have children without concern about who the father is or if that guy is even going to be in the child's life. Women get free food, housing and other benefits from the state. Meanwhile, the children grow up with no father and the one parent that is in their life is encouraged to be dependent on the state to bail them out whenever they make poor life decisions.I'm all for the traditional family. I also know it's not for everyone and there are those who would love a traditional family but it just doesn't work out.
There are all sorts of ways to increase the use of birth control. Just make it more financially and personally advantageous to use birth control than to not.